Editorial
| Author | Kay Pasley |
| Date | 01 October 2003 |
| Published date | 01 October 2003 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00313.x |
2003, Vol. 52, No. 4 313
Editorial
As a consumer of the scholarship and a researcher whose
primary interest is marital transitions, I have eagerly
awaited this Special Collection. When it was first pro-
posed by Drs. Braver and Cookston, I saw this as an opportunity
to bring together the work of some of the most outstanding
scholars nationally and internationally. In fact, if I were to iden-
tify those whose work has been well cited and influential over
time, many are included here.
My hope was to sponsor an effort that would highlight the
work of those respected and well-established researchers who
have studied the effects of divorce over time so as to examine
the nature of ‘‘the legacy of divorce,’’ a term coined by Dr.
Judith Wallerstein. The goal was to explore potentially opposing
viewpoints among divorce researchers, views that range along
the continuum from pessimistic to optimistic. My other hope was
to glean from this collection those areas of common ground
among ‘‘the best of the best’’ and have them raise key issues for
future research and practice.
I believe that both hopes are realized here. However, the
goal of exploring potentially opposing viewpoints was less suc-
cessful. Of four early researchers whose longitudinal studies of
families of divorce span decades, three chose to participate in
this project: Drs. E. Mavis Hetherington, Constance Ahrons, and
Joan B. Kelly (her early collaboration was with Wallerstein; see
Wallerstein & Kelly, 1980). Missing is the influential voice of
Wallerstein. She graciously accepted the invitation to prepare
both an introductory paper derived from her 2000 presentation
at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Rela-
tions. She also agreed to prepare a final paper which originally
was proposed as a summation and commentary, given her stature
in the field, on the points raised by the other authors, but which
evolved into a paper that would compare and contrast the value
of clinical interviews with more traditionally quantitative meth-
ods. However, after reviewing earlier drafts of the other manu-
scripts included here, she withdrew from the project.
As you read the contents of the Special Collection, remem-
ber that many of the scholars began their original studies of
families of divorce in the 1970s, using somewhat different meth-
ods and samples, and arriving at some unique but also many
common conclusions about the long-term effects of divorce on
children and families. What I see as an important common theme
reflected in both the early and the later work of these scholars,
as well as the work of the other scholars participating in this
project, is recognition that the majority of children of divorce
grow up to be contributing and healthy adults. Reflected in their
work is the recognition of a risk and resilience approach to
studying these families. In fact, Hetherington heralded this
change, advocating leaving behind the deficit perspective and
noting that children of divorce were ‘‘winners, losers, and sur-
vivors’’ (the title of her 1987 presidential address at the annual
meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development in
Baltimore). Like many others, she recognized that most children,
perhaps in spite of their divorce experiences, were not inevitably
damaged by the divorce experience, and she went on to discuss
the characteristics associated with greater or lesser risk for neg-
ative outcomes in children.
Although the topic of resilience gained attention, a message
of resilience is not universal among divorce researchers. Most
noticeably absent from the resilience message was the work of
Wallerstein (Wallerstein & Blakeslee, 1988; Wallerstein, Lewis,
& Blakeslee, 2000). However, writing from the perspective of
an experienced therapist working with families of divorce, Wall-
erstein’s recent publication with Blakeslee (What about the kids?
Raising your children before, during and after divorce [2003])
offers a more balanced portrayal of children’s experience with
divorce, emphasizing greater recognition of the diversity of ex-
periences than is evident in her earlier writing. In fact, I was
pleased to see Wallerstein mention resilience and offer encour-
aging words to divorcing parents, helpful suggestions for com-
municating effectively with children, and support for alternative
methods of problem resolution (e.g., mediation, collaborative
law approach). A richness derived from her clinical experiences
is communicated in the pages of her new book and resonates
with many of the suggestions made earlier by others—some as
early as 1975 (e.g., Ahrons’ The good divorce [1994]; Ahrons
& Rodgers’ Divorced families [1987]; Emery’s Renegotiating
family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation
[1994]; Hetherington & Kelly’s For better or worse [2002]; and
Weiss’ Marital separation [1975] and Going it alone [1979]).
I am delighted with the commitment to excellence on the part
of the outstanding scholars whose writing appears in the pages
that follow. Their willingness to look critically at their own efforts,
those of others, and the broader context in which this work occurs
can only increase the chances that research findings are effectively
communicated rather than misinterpreted.
K
AY
P
ASLEY
,E
D
.D., E
DITOR
References
Ahrons, C. S. (1994). The good divorce: Keeping your family together when
your marriage comes apart. New York: HarperCollins.
Ahrons, C. S., & Rodgers, R. H. (1987). Divorced families: A multidisciplinary
developmental view. New York: Norton.
Emery, R. E. (1994). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, custody, and
mediation. New York: Guilford Press.
Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or worse: Divorce reconsid-
ered. New York: Norton.
Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances: Men, women and
children a decade after divorce. New York: Ticknor & Fields.
Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (2003). What about the kids? Raising your
children before, during and after divorce. New York: Hyperion.
Wallerstein, J. S., & Kelly, J. B. (1980). Surviving the breakup: How children
and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books.
Wallerstein, J. S., Lewis, J. M., & Blakeslee, S. (2000). The unexpected legacy
of divorce: A 25 year landmark study. New York: Hyperion.
Weiss, R. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.
Weiss, R. (1979). Going it alone. New York: Basic Books.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting