Editor's Corner: On Relevance

Date01 March 2014
AuthorMarisa Anne Pagnattaro
Published date01 March 2014
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12023
Editor’s Corner: On Relevance
This is my first issue as editor in chief, and I am pleased to present this
scholarship, which offers careful critical thinking about a range of legal
concerns. Looking ahead and thinking about the next fifty years of the
American Business Law Journal (ABLJ), I realize that it is impossible for me
to envision the range of legal issues that will inevitably arise in this rapidly
changing world. What I do know right now, though, is that the scholarship
in the ABLJ is meant to be read. We seek to publish content that is both
timely and important for our discipline. We carefully select our articles
using a blind screening and blind peer review process. The articles then
undergo multiple stages of review and editing by dedicated articles editors,
all of whom are tenured professors. We believe that this editorial process
is a valuable model and one that yields the highest levels of legal scholar-
ship. Ultimately, we strive for relevance. To this end, these authors offer
insights, reforms, and recommendations to address a variety of issues
affecting business and consumers.
The first two articles address the ambiguity arising in patent cases
involving more than one infringing party. In “Simplifying Multiactor
Patent Infringement Cases Through Proper Application of Common Law
Doctrine,” Lynda J. Oswald analyzes the complicated landscape of
multiactor patent infringement. A key case in her inquiry is Akamai Tech-
nologies v. Limelight Networks, Inc., a Federal Circuit case that articulated a
new standard for liability, creating a great deal of consternation and con-
fusion in the world of patent law.1Because of the complexity of both the
legal rules and the creative environment, Oswald advocates for “more
deliberate application of common law doctrines,” suggesting ways in which
the courts should address the nuances critical to articulate clear standards
1Just as this issue was going to press, the United States Supreme Court granted the petition
for certiorari in this case.
bs_bs_banner
v

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT