Editor's Comments

Published date01 July 1982
Date01 July 1982
AuthorVincent O'Leary
DOI10.1177/002242788201900201
Subject MatterArticles
169
EDITOR’S
COMMENTS As
it
is
with each
of
us,
cer-
tain
periods
in
life
are
marked
by
great
changes,
and
so
it
is
in
the
life
of
this
Journal.
First,
it
is
my
sad
duty
to
report
the
passing
of
a
friend
and
colleague,
Michael
Hindelang.
A
full
professor
at
the
age
of
30,
Mike
had
a
brilliant
career,
a
part
of
which
included
an
associate
editorship
of
the
Journal
of Research
in
Crime
and
Delinquency.
A
statement
about
Mike
follows.
Suffice
to
say
here
he
will
be
missed
greatly.
Second,
Michael
Gottfredson
has
resigned
as
Associate
Editor
of
the
Journal,
with
his
appointment
to
the
Department
of
Sociology
at
the
University
of
Illinois,
where
he
will
specialize
in
criminology.
Michael
has
made
great
contributions
to
the
Journal
during
his
stay
at
Albany,
and
we
extend
our
appreciation
to
him
for
those
efforts.
He
will
continue
his
association
with
the
Journal
as
a
Consulting
Editor.
We
are
pleased
to
announce
that
David
Duffee
will
assume
the
position
of
Associate
Editor
in
Michael’s
place.
David
is
a
distinguished
scholar
and
an
old
friend
who
will
continue
the
fine
traditions
of
the
Journal.
Finally,
this
edition
of
the
Journal
marks
the
last
that
will
be
edited
by
Sarah
Dike
of
NCCD,
who
is
leaving
for
a
post
in
England.
We
wish
her
well
in
her
new
venture,
and
we
want
to
mark
her
departure
publicly
with
the
statement
that
she
has
been
a
key
person
in
producing
what
I
believe
is
a
first-rate
Journal.
She
will
be
very
difficult
to
replace.
Despite
all
these
changes,
the
Journal
goes
on,
and
this
is
a
particularly
interesting
edition.
Not
only
is
the
quality
of
the
articles
uniformly
high,
but,
moreover,
they
represent
much
of
the
spectrum
of
crime
and
delinquency
research.
The
first
two
articles
address
deter-
rence
research,
a
subject
of
increasing
activity
and
interest
in
recent
years.
Linda
Saltzman
and
her
colleagues
report
on
an
innovative
attempt
to
measure
deterrent
effects
through
the
use
of
a
self-report,
longitudinal
study.
A
near
replication
of
that
study
is
described
in
our
second
article,
by
William
Minor
and
Joseph
Harry.
These
two
studies
raise
serious
questions
about
the
conclusions
that
rely
on
techniques
which
try
to
assess
the
effect
of
deterrence
by
relating
present
attitudes
and
prior
behaviors.
It
is
rare
indeed
when
sequential
studies
such
as
these
are
published
together,
and
they
are
worth
close
reading.
The
next
set
of’
articles
presents
research
aimed
directly
at
the
criminal
justice
system.
The
first
of
these,
by
Eli
Noam,
uses
an
operations
research
approach
to
court
congestion
and
suggests
a
means
of
optimizing
scant
court
resources
in
order
to
gain
the
greatest
social
good.
Next
is
a
study
of
prison
discipline
by
Timothy
Flanagan,
which
examines
discretion
in
the
disciplinary
systems
of
prisons
from
a
general
model
of
&dquo;judicial&dquo;
fairness.
Flanagan
concludes
that
the
sanctions

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT