Does the one‐child generation want more than one child at their fertility age?

Published date01 April 2022
AuthorPenggang Wang,Heying Jenny Zhan,Jing Liu,Patricia M. Barrett
Date01 April 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12620
RESEARCH
Does the one-child generation want more than one
child at their fertility age?
Penggang Wang
1
|Heying Jenny Zhan
2
|Jing Liu
3
|
Patricia M. Barrett
2
1
Institute of Population, School of Economics,
Hebei University, Hebei, China
2
Department of Sociology, Georgia State
University, Atlanta, GA, USA
3
Department of Labor and Social Security,
School of Public Administration, Zhejiang
University of Finance and Economics,
Zhejiang, China
Correspondence
Heying Jenny Zhan, Department of Sociology,
Georgia State University, 38 Peach Tree
Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30302-5020,
USA; or Penggang Wang, Institute of
Population, School of Economics, Hebei
University, 2666 Qiyi East Road, Baoding,
Hebei, China 071002.
Emails: hzhan@gsu.edu or wpg2008@126.com
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to understand intentions to
have more children among reproductive-age Chinese
women who currently have had one child with the goal of
understanding the factors influencing Chinese womens
fertility intention 2 years after implementation of the uni-
versal two-child policy.
Background: On January 1, 2016, the national one-child
policy formally ended in China. Do Chinese women desire
to have more than one child? This study brings feminist
insight into the Chinese contexts of economic development
and patrilocal cultural tradition.
Method: This study used nationally representative data
(n=65,355) from the 2017 China Fertility Survey. Logis-
tic regression was used to explore the determinants of the
intention of having more children.
Results: Findings reveal that women from one-child fami-
lies are least likely to want additional children. Womens
higher income is negatively related to the desire to have
more children. Rural residence and having a female first-
born child are correlated with a greater likelihood of desir-
ing additional children.
Implications: Authoritative social policies may have chan-
ged fertility behaviors for a generation of Chinese families,
but removing restrictive fertility policies may not bring
about higher fertility rates. New family size norms and
family-friendly social policies may be needed to facilitate
higher fertility rates in China.
KEYWORDS
China, one-child policy, two-child intention
Received: 5 October 2020Revised: 13 July 2021Accepted: 9 August 2021
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12620
© 2021 National Council on Family Relations.
494 Family Relations. 2022;71:494512.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fare
On December 31, 2015, the Chinese government announced the new universal two-child policy,
effective immediately.
i
This announcement officially ended the 36-year one-child policy, which
started in 1979. One of the unintended consequences of the one-child policy is the increasing
proportions of the elderly population in China. To sustain a stable workforce and the tradi-
tional Chinese cultural practice of filial responsibility implementing a two-child policy is a
national agenda that concerns not just newlywed couples but also policymakers in China. One
would imagine, after decades of the fertility control forcing couples to have only one child,
todays young couples, especially those who were only children themselves as a consequence of
the one-child policy, would be eager to have a second child. In this article, we ask: What factors
influence young Chinese couplesdecisions or intentions to have a second child?
BACKGROUND
Feminist and family studies researchers have long argued that womens liberation is negatively
associated with the number of children women choose to have (Ahn, 1994; Brewster &
Rindfuss, 2000; Jain, 1981; R
obert & Bukodi, 2005). Specifically, womens higher education
levels and labor force participation raise their status at home and reduce the likelihood of hav-
ing multiple children (Ahn, 1994; Brewster & Rindfuss, 2000; Cavalli, 2010; Mills et al., 2008;
Testa, 2014; Willekens, 1991; Xu et al., 2016). In developed societies, women tend to receive
similar levels of education as men, and large numbers of women are employed in the public
labor force. As a result, total fertility rates, defined as the number of children per woman, are
very low in 2019 in societies such as Japan (1.4), Sweden (1.9), Germany (1.5), the
United Kingdom (1.9), and the United States (1.9; U.S. Bureau of Census, 2019). In societies
where women are less represented in the public labor force but family-owned businesses or
farms or who care for home and children, fertility rates tend to be high, such as in Nigeria (4.8),
Angola (6.0), Ethiopia (4.8), and Somalia (5.6) in Africa (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2019).
In 2019, Chinas total fertility rate was 1.6, lower than rates in the United States,
United Kingdom, and Sweden, and is below replacement level. Chinas fertility rate has
remained consistently low since 2000; this has been partially attributed to the nations rapid
economic development, but more important, to the longstanding one-child policy. The one-
child policy influenced billions of people from its inception in 1979, significantly changing fertil-
ity behaviors (Cai, 2010; Johnson, 1994; Li, 1995a; McElroy & Yang, 2000; Short &
Fengying, 1998). Under this policy, women were allowed to have only one child; having more
than one child resulted in severe penalties (Li, 1995; Short & Fengying, 1998). Such restrictions
were more powerful and rigid in urban settings, and the consequences could be as severe as per-
manent ineligibility for promotions among employees in state-owned sectors. In addition, the
illegitimate child might never be able to go to school due to a lack of legitimate birth registra-
tion. This policy was less forcefully reinforced in rural and remote areas where ethnic minorities
live (Guo & Zhang, 2003).
Consequently, the policy may have gradually changed the nations fertility norm, with hav-
ing more than one child becoming a deviant behavior among the general public and a privilege
for the ethnic minority population (Yang, 2017). Now that the two-child universal policy is in
effect, what factors might influence young Chinese couplesdecisions or intensions for having
an additional child? Using a national survey data, this article considers three theoretical argu-
ments; thus, we raise three fundamental research questions: (a) Is it the policy effect? That is, is
the two-child policy effectively influencing the intentions of one-child generation adults to have
more children? (b) Does womens liberation influence young womens intention to have no
more children? (c) Is it the patriarchal family tradition that pressures women to have more chil-
dren? To understand these questions, a review of relevant literature provides important context
and background on Chinese experiences that will inform our analyses.
TWO-CHILD INTENTION495

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex