Does foreign investment liberalisation enhance women's economic status? Micro‐evidence from urban China

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12873
AuthorLinhui Yu,Junsen Zhang,Yanbing Wen
Published date01 December 2019
Date01 December 2019
3404
|
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/twec World Econ. 2019;42:3404–3429.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12873
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Does foreign investment liberalisation enhance
women's economic status? Micro‐evidence from
urban China
LinhuiYu1
|
JunsenZhang2
|
YanbingWen3
1School of Economics,Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
2Department of Economics,Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3School of Economics,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China
Funding information
Zhejiang Provincial Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: LY18G030004; National Natural Science
Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71873120, 71672177 and 71703146
KEYWORDS
FDI liberalisation, gender earnings, women's economic status
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Globalisation is widely considered as one of the most important driving forces of economic growth and
social change. Foreign direct investment (FDI), which is one of the most important benefits of economic
globalisation, plays a crucial role in the technology transfer, industrial restructuring and employment
in the host country (Amiti & Konings, 2007; Barry, Görg, & Strobl, 2005). Most FDIs are designed to
create new businesses in the host, which usually translates to job creation and higher wages (Amiti &
Davis, 2012). How FDI affects gender inequality in the labour market is of great interest to economic re-
searchers in modern society where women's rights and economic independence are widely emphasised.
The answers to this question are of particular interest to policymakers who regard elimination of gender
wage discrimination as a long‐term commitment of the government during economic globalisation.
Prior studies have examined various issues of whether and how globalisation (e.g. exposure to
international trade and inward FDI) affect labour market inequality. These issues include the follow-
ing: wage and employment inequality across regions, industries and firms with different ownership
(e.g. Anwar & Sun, 2012; Chen, Ge, & Lai, 2011; Feng, 2016; Figini & Görg, 2011; Han, Liu, &
Zhang, 2012) and gender wage inequality among different firms (e.g. Braunstein & Brenner, 2007;
Chen, Ge, Lai, & Wan, 2013; Juhn, Ujhelyi, & Villegas‐Sanchez, 2014; Zhang, Han, Liu, & Zhao,
2008).1 Despite enormous efforts made by previous scholars on the exploration of this particular
1 Most of these studies use data from China, the world's second largest recipient of FDI. Chen et al. (2013) provides a
comprehensive review of the literature on globalisation and female wages and gender gap in the context of China.
|
3405
YU et al.
research topic, our understanding of the above issues remains limited and less clear cut because ex-
isting empirical findings are far from conclusive and are even conflicting, probably due to the differ-
ent data and econometric methods employed. In contrast to most existing research that looks into the
effects of FDI liberalisation on gender inequality using macro or firm‐level micro‐data and from the
perspective of wage inequality within regions or industries, our research aims to examine this partic-
ular issue using household‐level micro‐data and from the perspective of wage inequality within
families.
Foreign investment affects female wages and economic status through several important channels.
The first is the extra job opportunities provided for women by foreign‐invested enterprises (FIEs) as
the result of large influxes of foreign capital into the host country (Ozler, 2000; Oostendorp, 2009). In
particular, export‐oriented FDI in developing countries may increase demand for low‐skilled female
workers, thereby driving up average female wages (Standing, 1999). Large inflows of FDI also make
it possible for skilled female workers to work in multinational companies, which usually pay higher
wages than local domestic firms (Busse & Spielmann, 2006). However, the presence of FDI may also
affect women's labour market participation decisions and induce a large number of women to switch
from unpaid household work to paid jobs, thereby resulting in a surplus of female workers and reduc-
tion in equilibrium price (Seguino & Grown, 2006).
The second channel is competitive pressure brought by FDI to domestic firms in the host.
Massive entry of FIEs intensifies the market competition for qualified (skilled or unskilled) workers
in the labour market, which may result in an increase in demand for female labour and reduction in
gender discrimination in employment and wages (Li, Wang, & Jiang, 2015; Standing, 1999).2 The
presence of FDI also helps reduce occupational gender segregation in developing countries, which
enables female workers to enter some manufacturing industries dominated traditionally by male
workers (Adler & Izraeli, 1996). As a result, gender inequality in wages and employment narrows,
thereby leading to improved social status and economic condition of women (Zhou, Zhang, & Song,
2013).
The third channel is technology spillovers in the host, especially the advanced technologies or
skills particularly beneficial to females rather than males, for example those related to management
communication and psychological cognition that women have natural advantages (Braunstein &
Brenner, 2007). However, multinational companies can also bring skill‐intensive technological ad-
vances to the host and lead to increased demand for skilled workers, which may widen the gender
wage gap if average skills of women are lower than of men (Zhu, Liu, & Li, 2012). The literature
has also mentioned several other channels through which FDI may affect female wages in the host
country, for example human capital investment and labour force participation (e.g. Chi & Li, 2008,
2014; a comprehensive review of literature on the causes of gender wage gaps is provided by Blau &
Kahn, 2017).
The main purpose of this study is to examine whether and how FDI liberalisation affect women's
economic status in the household in the context of China. China provides us with an ideal setting to
look into this for several reasons. First, China's globalisation process has accelerated considerably
since its accession to the WTO in 2001, including a substantial relaxation of regulation on FDI in
2002. Second, labour market participation of Chinese women is high compared with other countries,
especially developing ones. Third, gender discrimination was to some extent severe in some regions,
2 Based on the economics of discrimination (Becker, 1957), a cost of gender discrimination exists and a fully competitive
environment will reduce firms' gender discrimination and preference behaviours.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT