Dividend smoothing and ownership concentration: Evidence from Latin America
Published date | 01 October 2023 |
Author | Tamara Tigero,Rodrigo Saens,Augusto Castillo |
Date | 01 October 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22639 |
Received: January Revised: April Accepted: April
DOI: ./jcaf.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Dividend smoothing and ownership concentration:
Evidence from Latin America
Tamara Tigero1Rodrigo Saens1Augusto Castillo2
Universidad de Talca, Chile
Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile
Correspondence
Rodrigo Saens, Universidad de Talca,
Chile.
Email: rsaens@utalca.cl
Abstract
We evaluate the impact of ownership concentration on dividend smoothing for
six Latin American economies characterized by both a low level of investor pro-
tection and high ownership concentration. Using a panel data set, we find that
firms with higher ownership concentration tend to engage more in dividend
smoothing, which is more evident for firms with high growth opportunities
and greater financial constraints. Our results also show that companies with
a mandatory minimum dividend rule (Brazil and Chile) do not engage in div-
idend smoothing as much as companies without this regulation (Argentina,
Colombia, Mexico, and Peru). These results are consistent with the idea that
in countries where the legal system does not protect minority shareholders,
firms would smooth dividends to build a reputation for moderation in expro-
priating shareholders. According to our results, this need for reputation would
be more important for firms with high ownership concentration, more growth
opportunities, and greater financial constraints.
KEYWORDS
agency costs, dividend smoothing, information asymmetry, ownership structure
JEL CLASSIFICATION
G, G, G
1 INTRODUCTION
This paper investigates the relationship between corpo-
rate ownership structure and dividend smoothing. Given
that information asymmetries and agency costs—between
shareholders and managers—differ according to the cor-
porate ownership structure, the relationship between
ownership concentration and dividend smoothing has
generated considerable research interest (Allen et al.,
;Brockmanetal.,; Fudenberg & Tirole, ;
Javakhadze et al., ; Koussis & Makrominas, ;
Rahman, ; among others).
Since Lintner (), we know that if firms adjust
dividends towards a long-term target, they do so only
gradually; that is, they smooth dividends (Brav et al., ;
Fama & Ba biak , ; Leary & Michaely, ). Based
on the information asymmetries that exist between the
internal members of the corporation and the external
shareholders, there are two main alternative theories that
explain dividend smoothing: signaling theory and agency
cost theory (Francis et al., ). Easterbrook ()and
Jensen () suggest, for example, that managers pay high
and stable dividends to signal to outside investors that
they will not invest in projects with negative present value,
as well as to mitigate agency conflicts between corporate
insiders and outside shareholders.
The signaling theory states that dividends serve as a sig-
nal of a firm’s future cash flows (Bhattacharya, ; John
108 © Wiley Periodicals LLC. J Corp Account Finance. ;:–.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jcaf
To continue reading
Request your trial