Diasporan students social entrepreneurship intention: The moderating role of institutional support

Published date01 February 2021
AuthorSadia Lukman,Peng Xiao Bao,Benjamin Kweku‐Lugu,Vincent Ekow Arkorful,Amadu Latif,Annabelle Gadabu,Priscilla Charmaine‐Kwade,Ibrahim Basiru,Mohammed Abubakar Sadiq
Date01 February 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2108
ACADEMIC PAPER
Diasporan students social entrepreneurship intention: The
moderating role of institutional support
Sadia Lukman
1
| Peng Xiao Bao
1
| Benjamin Kweku-Lugu
2
|
Vincent Ekow Arkorful
1
| Amadu Latif
1
| Annabelle Gadabu
1
|
Priscilla Charmaine-Kwade
1
| Ibrahim Basiru
1
| Mohammed Abubakar Sadiq
2
1
School of Public Affairs, University of Science
and Technology of China, Hefei, China
2
School of Management, University of Science
and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Correspondence
Sadia Lukman, School of Public Affairs,
University of Science and Technology of
China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Email: sadialukman@yahoo.com
The daunting global challenges saddling polities and governments alike have resul-
tantly created a situation whereby governments and corporate civil society have
inadvertently reneged on delivering public good and services to citizens. In ensuring
and strengthening a publicprivate actor synergy, with particular emphasis on
leveraging acquired knowledge and skills of diaspora-based students, social entrepre-
neurship activities could be harnessed to provide sustainable remedies to social chal-
lenges such as unemployment, famine amongst others by utilizing social
entrepreneurship as a tool. Using the theory of planned behaviour as a theoretical
framework, the study elicited data from 322 respondents to empirically investigate
determinants of social entrepreneurship intentions of Ghanaian students, with the
moderating role of institutional support. Study results revealed that sense of social
responsibility and service learning have significant relationship with social entrepreneur-
ship intention. However, social volunteering experience had no significant relationship.
Moreover, whereas attitude to social entrepreneurship intention demonstrated a positive
relationship, institutional support as a moderator was also revealed to influence the
relationship betw een attitude and soc ial entrepreneurs hip intention. From the
study findings, we discourse on the implications for social entrepreneurship in
Ghana to policy makers and stakeholders.
1|INTRODUCTION
Recent decades have witnessed an increased global commitment to
creating opportunities, whiles fostering the sustainable development
efforts. These commitments demonstrated by state and non-state
actors disparately, and sometimes jointly by both actors are designed
to enhance social livelihood and human well-being. Social entrepre-
neurship as an emerging global concept has been touted as an effica-
cious conduit for addressing diverse social challenges. Essentially, the
concept is acknowledged to have tremendous potency in helping to
alleviate poverty, unemployment, and environmental challenges
amongst others (Huda et al., 2019; Polbitsyn, 2018). Therefore, it is
not surprising that, social enterprise-based institutions are deploying
the concept to drive corporate goals. Significantly, social enterprises
have been variously conceptualized. In the views of Sun, Lee, and
Sohn (2019), social enterprises are referred to as organizations which
marshal and deploy business principles to tackle social problems.
Social enterprises undertake this activity through well-tailored innova-
tive strategies.
Social enterprises focus mostly vacillate between commercial and
social objectives. Within the context, social enterprises contribute
massively to job creation, workforce development and provides sup-
plementary income (Ip, Liang, Wu, Law, & Liu, 2018). Recent times
have witnessed a growth in social entrepreneurship research studies.
The ground-breaking initiative to advance a research model to explain
social entrepreneurship intention (SEI) creation was developed and
pioneered by Mair and Noboa (2006) through the application of the
theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Against this background,
Received: 31 August 2019 Revised: 14 December 2019 Accepted: 3 March 2020
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2108
J Public Affairs. 2021;21:e2108. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1of12
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2108

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT