A Developmental Approach to Understanding Gender Differences Among Youth Offenders Regarding Perceptions of Police Legitimacy
Published date | 01 March 2024 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/10575677231154861 |
Author | Selye Lee,Hyunin Baek,Jonathon Cooper |
Date | 01 March 2024 |
A Developmental Approach
to Understanding Gender
Differences Among Youth
Offenders Regarding
Perceptions of Police
Legitimacy
Selye Lee
1
, Hyunin Baek
2
,
and Jonathon Cooper
3
Abstract
While there is a rich body of literature regarding attitudes toward the police,longitudinal empirical
research on perceptions of police legitimacy among youth offenders is scant. Using data from
Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of 1,354 serious juvenile offenders, the current
study builds upon the literature by identifying developmental trajectories of perceptions of police
legitimacy among serious young offenders by gender. The study used group-based trajectory mod-
eling, which yielded five trajectory groups for males and four trajectory groups for females. Female
youth offenders exhibited slight increases in perceptions of police legitimacy, whereas males showed
variations in perceptions of police legitimacy across the seven waves. To examine the probability
that predictors belong to certain trajectory groups, the average marginal effects from a multinomial
logit regression model were calculated. The findings showed that direct and indirect procedural jus-
tice and Black were statistically significant predictors of the probability of police legitimacy trajec-
tories for both males and females. Compared with the male youth offenders, among their female
counterparts, legal cynicism, self-reported offense, Hispanic, and age were not associated with
the probability of each trajectory group. Given our findings and the strong association between
the likelihood of offending and perceptions of the police, we suggest that existing early intervention
programs may add a curriculum on prosocial attitudes toward the police. The findings also shed light
on the significance of gender in the developmental perspective of police legitimacy perceptions
among youth offenders.
1
Department of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA
2
Department of Criminal Justice, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA
3
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA
Corresponding Author:
Selye Lee, Department of Criminology, Sociology, andGeography, Arkansas State University, HSS 3131, P.O. Box 2410,
Jonesboro, AR 72467, USA.
Email: selee@astate.edu
Original Article
International Criminal Justice Review
2024, Vol. 34(1) 20-42
© 2023 Georgia State University
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/10575677231154861
journals.sagepub.com/home/icj
Keywords
police legitimacy, youth offenders, group-based modeling, marginal effects, gender differences
Introduction
The 1960s, early 1990s, and the second decade of the 21st century are low watermarks for police
legitimacy. Tensions between law enforcement officers and civilians continue to occur, prompting
efforts to better understand public views and attitudes about the police (Albrecht & Green, 1977).
Recent events such as the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Michael Brown, and Eric
Garner at the hands of law enforcement have harmed police legitimacy around the country.
Understanding the underlying etiology of public attitudes toward the police—especially of youth,
a vulnerable population that is frequently in contact with the police—is therefore vital for any depart-
ment seeking to restore its legitimacy in the eyes of the body politic. A crucial first step in restoring
police legitimacy is to strengthen procedurally fair policing practices by understanding the public’s
perception of law enforcement officers.
Previous studies have fruitfully identified various factors as predictors of attitudes toward the
police and their services. However, the empirical research on perceptions of police legitimacy is
largely limited to studies of adult populations in the United States, even though the age of respon-
dents tends to be inversely associated with public views regarding police legitimacy, with
younger populations exhibiting less favorable attitudes than those shown by their older counterparts
(Hinds, 2009; Hurst & Frank, 2000). Examining adolescent views of police legitimacy has become
even more critical as young people grow up in an era of mistrust of law enforcement (Fine et al.,
2020; Trinkner & Tyler, 2016).
Despite this reality, very little is known about how juveniles regard the police from a developmental
perspective (Esbensen et al., 2001; Fine et al., 2020; Mclean et al., 2019; Piquero et al., 2005; Stewart
et al., 2014). Most works devoted to this issue also have not exclusively focused on perceptionsof police
legitimacy. In addition, while some research has examined gender differences in impressions regarding
the police, their results in both juvenile and adult populations are inconclusive and often contradictory.
To illustrate, while some research has suggested that adolescent males hold more critical views of the
police than females (Winfree & Griffiths, 1977), more recent research on youth populations implied
the reverse (Hurst & Frank, 2000). Lastly, understanding views on police legitimacy among serious
juvenile offenders is perhaps more important than doing so among the general youth population
because the former have more frequent encounters with the criminal justice system, especially with
the police (Leiber et al., 1998), which may influence their opinions and perceptions of law enforcement.
To this end, we employed a developmental perspective in identifying attitudes toward the police
among seriousadolescent offenders. More specifically, we identified several developmentaltrajectories
that help explainyouth offenders’views on police legitimacy. The current study used the seven waves
of Pathways to Desistance data over a period of 36 months. In addition, we examined differences in
attitudes about police legitimacy trajectories and determined the factors that might be associated
with each trajectory on the basis of gender. What follows is a brief overview of the existing literature
on juvenile perceptions of police legitimacy and developmental perspectives on impressions regarding
police legitimacyamong adolescent offenders, a discussionof our methodology, and a detailed review
of our results and their implication for the corpus of research on police legitimacy.
Literature Reviews
Youth Perceptions of Police Legitimacy
People’s willingness to cooperate with the police as law abiders, problem solvers, and crime
reporters seems to depend on the public’s favorable perceptions and attitudes toward policing
Lee et al.21
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
