The Law of Armed Conflict and Detention Operations in Afghanistan

AuthorMatthew C. Waxman
PositionAssociate Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Adjunct Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations; Member, Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law
Pages343-356
XII
The Law ofArmed Conflict and Detention
Operations in Afghanistan
Matthew C. Waxman*
Inreflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan,
three key issues related to the law of armed conflict stand out: one substantive,
one procedural and one policy. The substantive matterwhat are the minimum
baseline treatment standards required as amatter of international law?has clari-
fied significantly during the course of operations there, largely as aresult of the US
Supreme Court's holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld} The procedural matterwhat
adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who maybe
detained?eludes consensus and has become more controversial the longer the
Afghan conflict has continued. And the policy matterin waging counterinsur-
gency warfare, how do foreign military forces transition military detention opera-
tions to effective civilian institutions?has emerged as acritical strategic priority
for which the law of armed conflict provides little instructive guidance.
President Barack Obama's determination to close Guantanamo while expand-
ing US military commitments in Afghanistan will draw new public attention to
these questions. After briefly explaining the basis ofUS and coalition detention op-
erations, this article addresses each of these issues in turn. Viewing them together,
*Associate Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Adjunct Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign
Relations; Member, Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT