Description of Relational Processes: Recent Changes in DSM‐5 and Proposals for ICD‐11

AuthorDavid Reiss,Nadine Kaslow,Marianne Wamboldt
Date01 March 2015
Published date01 March 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12120
Description of Relational Processes: Recent
Changes in DSM-5 and Proposals for ICD-11
MARIANNE WAMBOLDT*
NADINE KASLOW
DAVID REISS
Epidemiologic, prospective, and retrospective research confirms that family relational
variables are significant risk factors for the development of mental and physical health
problems in children as well as adults. In addition, relationships also play a moderating
role in the maintenance, exacerbation, or amelioration of chronic health problems.
Although acknowledgment of the importance of these variables in the pathophysiology of a
number of health conditions is reaching more prominence, the integration of assessments
of family factors as part of standard health care has made little progress. With the arrival
of the Affordable Care Act in the United States, there is a desire for earlier identification of
these risk factors, and the ability to implement prevention programs that reduce risk, and
enhance protective factors. On a global level, there is increased awareness of the health
impact of relational problems, for example, many countries have attempted to implement
programs to decrease domestic violence. More reliable and standardized assessments of key
relational processes will enhance both of these missions, and allow comparison of a variety
of prevention and intervention programs. This article discusses progress over the last dec-
ade in constructing more reliable definitions of relationship processes, how these have been
integrated into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th edition (DSM-5), and progress
toward implementation into the World Health Organization’s International Classification
of Diseases (ICD-11).
Keywords: Relational Diagnoses; DSM-5; ICD-11
Fam Proc 54:6–16, 2015
WHY A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO RELATIONAL DIAGNOSIS?
Basic and translational research explicating the role of key interpersonal relation-
ships in the development, mediation, and moderation of many of our mental disor-
ders has increased substantially over the past two decades (Beach et al., 2006). A few
categories of this research include retrospective risk assessments, such as the Adverse
Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study (Felitti et al., 1998); prospective environmental
studies which yield patterns of psychosocial risk variables associated with psychiatric
disorders (e.g., Copeland, Shanahan, Costello, & Angold, 2009a), and genetically
informed prospective studies (e.g., Caspi, Hariri, Holmes, Uher, & Moffitt, 2010;
Tienari et al., 2004; Uher et al ., 2011) that document both direct effect of family vari-
*Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marianne Wamboldt, Psychiatry, Chil-
dren’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th Ave., B130, Aurora, CO 80045. E-mail: marianne.wamboldt@
childrenscolorado.org.
6
Family Process, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2015 ©2015 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12120

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT