Demand Effects in Likelihood of Confusion Surveys: the Importance of Marketplace Conditions

AuthorItamar Simonson and Ran Kivetz
Pages243-259
243
11
Demand Effects
in Likelihood of
Confusion Surveys:
the Importance of
Marketplace Conditions
By Itamar Simonson and Ran Kivetz
Asthe useofsurveys in litigation in general, and in connection with
trademarkmatters in particular,hasincreased, courts havecome to
recognizepotential problemsthataffectthe reliability of the surveys’
methodologyand findings.One potential problem thathasreceived a
greatdeal of attention and hasbeen cited asakeyreason forexcluding
orgiving little weighttolikelihood of confusion and othersurveys1is
called demand effects.Demand effects2(alsoreferred toasdemand
artifacts)areproduced when respondents usecuesprovided bythe
surveyproceduresand questionstofigureout the purposeofthe survey
and toidentifythe correct” answers tothe questionstheyareasked.
The respondents maythen provide whattheyperceiveasthe corrector
expected answers,tomake surethatthe results “come out right.
1. Simon Property GroupL.P. v.mySimon, Inc., 104F.Supp. 2d1033 (S.D. Ind.
2000);Kargo Global, Inc. v.Advance Magazine Publishers,Inc., Opinion &Order,06
Civ.550(S.D.N.Y. 2007);GovernmentEmployeesInsurance Companyv.Google Inc.,
etal., East.Dist.ofVirginia,2005U.S.Dist.LEXIS18642; 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d(BNA)1841;
THOIP v.The WaltDisneyCo. etal., Opinion and Order,08Civ.6823 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).
2.The first article todescribe the demand effects thatcan be produced bythe
demand characteristicsof astudyisMartin T. Orne, On the Social Psychology of the
Psychological Experiment, 17A. P. 776 (1962).
Thischapterhasbenefited from the comments of Dr.ShariDiamond, Dr.Gerald Ford,
Dr.AnnaBelle Sartore, and JerreSwann.
Section V
244
Although demand characteristicsarelikelytobepresenttosome degree in
most surveys and experiments,becausethe surveycontext mayin some caseselicit
hypothesesabout the purposeofthe research, thischapterfocuseson moresevere
demand effects,thosethatcan largelydetermine and significantlybiassurveyfindings.
Since the objectiveofalikelihood of confusion surveyisusuallytoestimatethe
marketplace likelihood of confusion, ratherthan anyconfusion thatislimited to(oris
morepronounced in) the survey’s context,severedemand effects can preventsurveys
from achieving theirgoal, potentiallyleading toincorrectconclusions.
Asexplained in moredetail subsequently,severedemand effects can be
particularlyproblematic when the surveydesign and related questions(a) suggest
the correctanswerand/or(b) causerespondents tomake comparisonsorconsider
relationsand otheraspects,which theywould nothavedone outside the context of
thatstudy(i.e., in the marketplace). Furthermore, asdiscussed below,while some
demand effects aretransparent,others aremoresubtle but often notless significant.
Thischapterfocusesmainlyon demand effects astheyapplytolikelihood of
confusion surveys.
The chapterbeginswithabrief, general reviewof prioracademic research on
demand effects.Itthen outlinesafewprinciplesthatpertain tothe role of demand
effects in the twomain typesof likelihood of confusion surveys,often referred to
asEveready (orMonadic)and Sequential Line-up3(alsoreferred toassequential
presentation design). Three specific casesaredescribed belowin some detail,
focusing on aspects of surveys in thesecasesthatgaverisetoseveredemand effects.
Academic Research Regarding Demand Effects in Social-
Psychological and Buyer-Behavior Experiments
Agreatdeal of research in the fieldsof social psychologyand consumerbehavior
hasexamined the role and consequencesof demand characteristics4and resulting
demand effects. 5Much of thisresearch hasfocused on experimental findings,
especiallythe impactof such effects on the internal validity6and external validity (or
3.See, forexample, J. TMC,MC T UC
(September2007)(MC)at§32:174, §32:177.
4. Demand characteristicsrefertofeaturesof the methodology,such asleading questions,thatproduce
demand effects; thatis,demand characteristicstend tolead respondents toprovide whattheyperceiveas
the correct” orexpected answers,therebyproducing demand effects.
5. Orne, supra note2; Terence A. Shimp, EvaM.Hyatt,&David J. Snyder,ACritical Appraisal
of Demand Artifacts in Consumer Research, 18 J. CR.273 (1991);Stephen J. Weber&
ThomasD. Cook, Subject Effects in Laboratory Research: An Examination of Subject Roles, Demand
Characteristics, and Valid Inference, 77 P. B. 273 (1972).
6.Internal validity refers tothe degree towhich aprocedureallows one todrawconclusionsregarding
causal relations.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT