Delegation of Power to Agencies
| Pages | 9-20 |
| Author | Richard J. Pierce, Jr. |
9
Chapter 2
DELEGATION OF POWER
TO AGENCIES
Most age ncies have ma ny p owers, inc luding the pow er to
investigate, to prosecute, to require record -keeping and reporting,
and to publicize. The most important agency powers, however, are
the power to adjudicate disputes involving the rights of individuals
and the power to issue legally-binding rules of conduct. Both of those
agency powers have long existed under a cloud of constitutional
doubt.
A. Constitutional Limits on the Power to Delegate
Policymaking
Article I of the Constitution provides that “[a]ll legislative
powers shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” For over
200 years, the Co urt has interpreted that provision to prohibit
Congress from delegating its legi slative power and has equat ed
legislative power with policymaking.
1
Thus, the non-delegation
doctrine purports to pro hibit Congress f rom d elegating to age ncies
the power to make legally-binding policy decisions. The doctrine fits
awkwardly in a legal system in which agencies make far more legally-
binding policy decisions than Congress.
The non-delegation doctrine does not follow inevitably from the
language of Article I. By its terms, the Constitution neither equates
legislative power with policymaking nor prohibits Congress from
delegating legislative power. Moreover, the first Congress enacted
two statutes that delegated the power to make legally-binding policy
decisions to other branches of government.
2
It seems unlikely that a
Congress dominated by Framers of the Constitution would
immediately act in a m anner inconsistent with the Constitution. No
Justice questione d the validity of the non-delegation doctrine until
2001, however, and a majority of the Court continues to reaffirm the
doctrine.
The Court’s application of the non-delegation doctrine has never
coincided with its descript ion of the doctrine. The Court has applied
the doctrine to invalidate only one statute, and it has upheld many
statutes that delegate to agencies the power to make legally-binding
Brig Aurora, 11 U.S. 382 (1813); Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649,
692 (1892).
2
I Stat. 83 (1789); I Stat. 137 (1789).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting