Decision‐Making Power, Autonomy, and Communication in Remarried Spouses Compared With First‐Married Spouses*

AuthorNorman Epstein,Elizabeth Sandin Allen,Donald H. Baucom,Charles K. Burnett,Lynn A. Rankin‐Esquer
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00326.x
Published date01 October 2001
Date01 October 2001
326 Family Relations
Decision-Making Power, Autonomy, and Communication in
Remarried Spouses Compared With First-Married Spouses*
Elizabeth Sandin Allen, Donald H. Baucom,** Charles K. Burnett, Norman Epstein, and Lynn A. Rankin-Esquer
The current study evaluated differences between remarried and first-married individuals in communication and standards for autonomy
and decision-making power using self-report data from 111 remarried and 111 matched first-married spouses. Remarried spouses
endorsed more autonomous standards in childrearing and finances. Also, remarried women endorsed greater autonomy regarding
friendships and family. These standards for greater autonomy were not related to marital distress. No differences were found in
standards for marital decision-making power. Remarried spouses did not report more avoidance in communication about marital
problems, and avoidance of problem discussion was related to marital distress for both groups.
Almost half of all marriages in the United States involve
at least one previously married partner (Wilson &
Clarke, 1992). Although a large body of literature has
examined the dynamics of remarried families, usually with step-
children, relatively little empirical work has examined the mar-
itally relevant cognitions and behaviors of remarried spouses.
From a cognitive–behavioral model of marriage, an examination
of maritally relevant cognitions and behaviors is key to under-
standing marital functioning (Baucom & Epstein, 1990). Clinical
experience, theory, and existing empirical studies indicate that
the cognitions and behaviors of remarried individuals can change
from an earlier marriage (e.g., Byrd & Smith, 1988; Prado &
Markman, 1999; Roberts & Price, 1985). Such cognitive or be-
havioral change might occur as a function of experience in a
previous marriage, followed by divorce, singlehood, and remar-
riage. Alternatively, these changes might occur because of the
unique challenges and circumstances of remarriage or natural
developmental changes as the individual ages. Regardless of the
specific etiologies of such changes, individuals in remarriages
might have changed their marital cognitions and behaviors from
their first marriages.
Given these reported changes from first marriage to remar-
riage, a possible inference is that remarried individuals, as a
group, differ in key ways from those in a first marriage; however,
this inference rarely has been empirically tested. An awareness
of possible differences is helpful for basic understanding of re-
married persons and for clinical intervention with remarried in-
dividuals and their marriages. It is problematic to use first-mar-
riage families as the norm when evaluating stepfamilies (e.g.,
Anderson & White, 1986; Fine & Schwebel, 1991; Pink & Wam-
pler, 1985); similarly, it may be maladaptive to use norms de-
veloped from persons in their first marriages to evaluate a re-
married individual’s maritally related cognitions and behavior.
Because most remarriage literature focuses on the remarried fam-
ily rather than remarried individuals, there is a need for basic
information about these individuals to further our understanding
of how their cognitions and behaviors compare with persons in
a first marriage.
*Collection of this data was supported by a grant from the National Institute ofMental
Health (MHSBIR43 MH47627). This is a subset of data presented in Baucom, Epstein,
Rankin, and Burnett (1996) and Rankin-Esquer, Burnett, Baucom, and Epstein (1997).
**Address correspondence concerning this article to: Donald H. Baucom, Ph.D. De-
partment of Psychology, CB# 3270, Davie Hall, The University of North Carolina atChapel
Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270; e-mail don baucom@unc.edu
Key Words: autonomy, communication, decision-making power, remarriage.
(Family Relations, 2001, 50, 326–334)
Research examining cognitions and behavior in marriage has
established that one important type of cognition related to marital
quality is an individual’s standards for how marital relationships
and partners should be (Baucom, Epstein, Rankin, & Burnett,
1996). Individuals typically have standards for relationship au-
tonomy and power—two dimensions important in individual and
marital functioning (Epstein & Baucom, 2001). Marital adjust-
ment also is related to communication behaviors such as spousal
tendencies to approach or avoid discussion of relationship con-
flicts (Christensen & Sullaway, 1984). In the current study, we
compare individuals who are remarried with those in their first
marriages, investigating their standards for how marriage should
be in the domains of autonomy and decision-making power and
their reported communication patterns.
Decision-Making Power
Decision-making power appears to be fairly equal between
partners in remarriages; moreover, persons in a remarriage per-
ceive that they have more equal sharing in decision making in
their remarriage compared with their first marriage (Coleman &
Ganong, 1989; Crosbie-Burnett & Giles-Sims, 1991; Furstenberg
& Spanier, 1984). This is consistent with other literature that
indicates remarried individuals may be more egalitarian than
first-married individuals (e.g., Byrd & Smith, 1988; Ishii-Kuntz
& Coltrane, 1992; Pyke, 1994). However, Kurdek’s (1990) direct
comparison of the decision-making power of remarried individ-
uals to that of persons in their first marriages revealed no dif-
ferences. Given these seemingly contradictory findings, the cur-
rent investigation assessed the standards for marital decision
making for remarried persons compared with first-married per-
sons. Based on the body of literature that posits shifts in deci-
sion-making power for remarried individuals, we hypothesized
that remarrieds have a higher standard for sharing decision mak-
ing than first-married spouses.
Autonomy
A second major area that may differ for remarried and first-
married spouses is level of autonomy within marriage. Theoret-
ical models of the process of divorce and remarriage, discussions
with members of remarriage groups, and retrospective interviews
with remarrying women indicate that remarried spouses, espe-
cially women, may desire more autonomy as individuals within
their remarriages (Goetting, 1982; Roberts & Price, 1987; Walk-
er & Messinger, 1979). However, these studies did not use com-
parison groups to test whether remarried spouses desire greater
autonomy than do first-married spouses. Thus, we investigate the
standards remarried individuals have regarding autonomy com-

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex