A Decade of Natural Resource Damage Liability: Key Federal Decisions 2004-2014
Date | 01 October 2014 |
Author | Barbara J. Goldsmith, Tara Waikem Flynn, and Tara Franey |
44 ELR 10868 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 10-2014
C O M M E N T
A Decade of Natural Resource
Damage Liability: Key Federal
Decisions 2004-2014
by Barbara J. Goldsmith, Tara Waikem Flynn, and Tara Franey
Barbara J. Goldsmith is President of Barbara J. Goldsmith & Company LLC and Director of the Ad-Hoc Industry
Natural Resource Management Group. Tara Waikem Flynn serves as Projects Counsel at Barbara J. Goldsmith
& Company LLC, and Tara Franey is a Projects Associate at Barbara J. Goldsmith & Company LLC.
I. Introduction
Liability for natural resource damages (NRD) was rst
authorized when the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
19801 was enacted. Over the years, claims for NR D have
also been brought pursuant to a number of other federal
statutes, including the Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 19902
and the Clean Water Act (CWA),3 as well as statutes in
over 40 states t hat contain provisions authorizing the
recovery of NRD. In addition, common-law claims such
as trespass and nuisance have also been used to seek NRD
recoveries. Under federal and state statutes, parties are typ-
ically responsible for damages associated with injuries to
natural resources resulting from the release of ha zardous
substances and oil.
e past 30 years have seen a slow appearance and
evolution of NRD-related case law. e range of infor-
mation resulting from the various decisions issued in the
1. 42 U.S.C. §§9601-9675, ELR S. CERCLA §§101-405.
2. 33 U.S.C. §§2701-2761, ELR S. OPA §§1001-7001.
3. 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387, ELR S. FWPCA §§101-607.
past decade may be useful to legal practitioners, particu-
larly relative to dening NRD liability, guiding procedural
actions, and resolving liability claims. is Comment
focuses on federal judicial opinions that were issued dur-
ing the period 200 4-2014 under CERCLA and OPA, as
those are the principal federal statutes under which opin-
ions have been issued. While there have been some state
case law developments in the past se veral years, particu-
larly in the New Jersey superior courts, those decisions are
not discussed here.
e Comment rst provides some brief context con-
cerning NRD liability under CERCLA and OPA. Next, it
highlights and summarizes federal NRD case law develop-
ments of the past 10 years at both the district and appellate
levels that have addressed the following issues: (1)legisla-
tive elements of a federal NRD liability claim; (2)limita-
tions of liability; (3)procedural matters; (4)damages; and
(5)settlements.
II. NRD Liability Under Federal Statutes
Liabilit y for NRD may arise at sites from historical
contamin ation, inst antaneous oil spil ls, or ac cidents
involving the release of oil or hazardous substances a nd
is authorized under a variety of federal laws, including
CERCLA, C WA, OPA, the Nationa l Marine Sanctuar-
ies Act,4 a nd the Park System Resource Protection Act.5
ese federal statutes contain specic provisions autho-
rizing t he recovery of d amage s for NRD liability, includ-
ing the recovery of the injur y to, destruction of, or loss
of nat ural resou rces, as well as the reasonable c osts of a
damag e asses sment.6
4. 16 U.S.C. §§1431-1445.
5. 16 U.S.C. §§19(jj). See generally National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad-
ministration Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program
(NOAA DARRP), About Relevant Laws, available at http://www.darrp.
noaa.gov/about/laws.html.
6. 42 U.S.C. §§101(6), 107(a)(4)(C); 42 U.S.C. §§1001(5), 1002(b)(2).
and natural resources. It has tracked case law developments
e
Resource Management Group or its industrial company members.
is Comment is intended to serve as an adjunct to a compilation
HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF NATURAL RESOURCE
DAMAGES
2004. e HANDBOOK
Copyright © 2014 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.
To continue reading
Request your trial