Debt Policy Rules in an Open Economy

AuthorNORITAKA MAEBAYASHI,KEIICHI MORIMOTO,KOICHI FUTAGAMI,TAKEO HORI
Date01 February 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12197
Published date01 February 2017
DEBT POLICY RULES IN AN OPEN ECONOMY
KEIICHI MORIMOTO
Meisei University
TAKEO HORI
Tokyo Institute of Technology
NORITAKA MAEBAYASHI
The University of Kitakyushu
KOICHI FUTAGAMI
Osaka University
Abstract
In a small open economy model of endogenous growth with public cap-
ital accumulation, we examine the effects of a debt policy rule under
which the government must reduce its debt–GDP ratio if it exceeds the
criterion level. To sustain public debt at a finite level, the government
should adjust public spending rather than the income tax rate. The
long-run debt–GDP ratio should be kept sufficiently low to avoid equi-
librium indeterminacy. Under sustainability and determinacy, a tighter
(looser) debt rule brings welfare gains when the world interest rate is
relatively high (low).
1. Introduction
Discretionary fiscal policies during the 2008–2009 world crisis resulted in serious in-
creases in government debt in the Euro area. In 2011, the average debt–GDP ratio in
the Euro area reached 88% of GDP, some 20 percentage points higher than at the start
of the crisis in 2007. Public debt as a share of GDP in Greece equaled 166.1% in 2012.
Debt–GDP ratios in Italy, Ireland, and Portugal also exceeded 100%. These weak fiscal
Keiichi Morimoto, Department of Economics, Meisei University, 2-1-1 Hodokubo, Hino, Tokyo
191-8506, Japan (keiichi.morimoto@meisei-u.ac.jp). Takeo Hori, Department of Social Engi-
neering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
(hori.t.ag@m.titech.ac.jp). Noritaka Maebayashi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,
The University of Kitakyushu, 4-2-1 Kitagata, Kokura Minami-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 802-8577, Japan
(non818mn@kitakyu-u.ac.jp). Koichi Futagami, Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University,1-7
Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan (futagami@econ.osaka-u.ac.jp).
We would like to thank Luca Agnello, Tomohiro Hirano, Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, Ryuichiro Murota,
Yoshiyasu Ono, Josef Schroth, Takayuki Tsuruga, Stephan Turnovsky, Tuan Khai Vu, Akira Yakita,
Cheng-Chen Yang, and the participants at the 2013 Asian Meeting of the Econometric Society,the 2013
European Meeting of the Econometric Society, and other conferences for their helpful comments and
suggestions. This study was conducted while the second author was in Aoyamagakuin University. Weare
responsible for any remaining errors.
Received June 30, 2014; Accepted November 3, 2015.
C2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Public Economic Theory, 19 (1), 2017, pp. 158–177.
158
Debt Policy Rules 159
conditions raised doubts about these countries’ abilities to finance their increased debt.
As a response to the crisis, the EU has introduced strong fiscal consolidations under the
surveillance of the European Commission. Overall public deficits were reduced thanks
to expenditure cuts, especially lower public investments, as stated in public finances in
EMU (European Commission 2012).1According to the Stability and Convergence Pro-
grammes submitted to the Commission and Council in Spring 2012, EU Member States
plan to base further fiscal consolidation on expenditure cuts that include reductions
in public investment. According to the debt reduction benchmark introduced by the
reform of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), the so-called “Six-Pack,” in December
2011, Member States whose current debt-to-GDP ratio is above the 60% threshold have
to reduce the distance to 60% by an average rate of one-twentieth per year.2It is impor-
tant to investigate the effects of the debt-reduction rule proposed by the SGP under its
requirements.
Some authors have examined the effects of such a debt-reduction rule. In an en-
dogenous growth model whose growth engine is the flow of public service as in Barro
(1990), Futagami, Iwaisako, and Ohdoi (2008) investigate the effects of a government
bond-issuance rule that requires the government to reduce its debt at a steady pace if its
debt is beyond the criterion level. Maebayashi, Hori, and Futagami (2013, forthcoming)
use an endogenous growth model whose engine of growth is public capital accumula-
tion to study the same issue. These authors provide interesting results, but their inves-
tigations are confined to closed economies; accordingly, transactions in foreign capital
markets are removed. In reality, both the government and private sector can borrow
and lend their assets in the foreign capital market. Countries holding large levels of
debt such as Greece, Italy, Ireland, and Portugal hold large external debt as well. This
shows the significance of studying the debt policy rule described here in a model of an
open economy.
For our purpose, we consider an endogenously growing small open economy where
the government adopts a debt-reduction rule. As in Futagami, Morita, and Shibata
(1993) and Turnovsky (1997), public capital accumulated through public investment
has positive effects on private goods production. The government finances its spending
on public investment by imposing a tax on income and by issuing bonds. Public bond
issuance is under the restriction of the same debt policy rule as that in Futagami et al.
(2008). We consider two types of public finance budget regimes. In budgetary regime I,
if the debt–GDP ratio exceeds the criterion level, the government adjusts its expenditure
with a fixed tax rate to reduce this ratio. In budgetary regime II, if the debt–GDP ratio
exceeds the criterion level, the government controls the tax rate to reduce its debt with
a fixed expenditure ratio. In both regimes, the debt–GDP ratio tends to the criterion
level in the long run. The criterion level can be considered as the long-run debt–GDP
ratio.
In budgetary regime I, there exists a unique steady-state equilibrium. The long-run
debt–GDP ratio is a crucial determinant of the steady-state stability and equilibrium
(in)determinacy. When the long-run debt–GDP ratio is sufficiently low, the steady state
is saddle-stable and hence exhibits equilibrium determinacy. However, if the govern-
ment sets a high criterion debt–GDP ratio, equilibrium indeterminacy arises because
1In the Euro area, the average general government deficit fell from 6.2% of GDP in 2010 to 4.1% of
GDP in 2011.
2The Maastrichit Treaty asks EU countries to keep their deficit and debt levels below 3% and 60%,
respectively, to ensure compliance with budgetary discipline.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT