Data envelopment analysis to investigate the Italian legal system and its reform

Published date01 November 2023
AuthorGreta Falavigna,Roberto Ippoliti
Date01 November 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2877
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Data envelopment analysis to investigate the Italian legal
system and its reform
Greta Falavigna
1
| Roberto Ippoliti
1,2
1
Research Institute on Sustainable Economic
Growth (IRCrES), National Research Council of
Italy (CNR), Torino, Italy
2
Faculty of Business Administration and
Economics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld,
Germany
Correspondence
Roberto Ippoliti, Faculty of Business
Administration and Economics, Bielefeld
University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Email: roberto.ippoliti@uni-bielefeld.de
This work investigates the Italian judicial system and discusses the designing of a pol-
icy reform to boost the efficiency of courts, considering the human resources avail-
able as well as the expenditure generated by the process to deliver justice. The
authors present the benchmarks and shed light on how policy makers embarking on
such a process of reform may be misled by inappropriate model definition. In detail,
the authors propose a comparative analysis of technical efficiency (TE) scores com-
puted using data envelopment analysis, adopting the same output (number of settled
cases) and two alternative sets of inputs (judicial expenditure and human resources).
According to the results, without considering the information extracted from the two
complementary benchmark analyses, policy makers might be misled in the reform
process. Regarding the elements that affect the performance of courts, it may be pos-
sible to improve the efficiency of judicial districts by working on judicial procedures.
Hence, these are the domains where interventions by policy makers may prove suc-
cessful. As for policy implications, the models and benchmarks presented here could
be used to devise a reform of the judicial system aimed at enhancing its TE, while also
keeping public expenditure under control.
KEYWORDS
court, data envelopment analysis, judicial efficiency, judicial geography, legal environment,
policy reform
1|INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the worldwide financial crisis has caused the public
debt of countries to rise (Woo & Kumar, 2015), which is likely to
affect welfare and economic growth over time (Checherita-
Westphal & Rother, 2012; Chudik et al., 2017), along with the
intertemporal transfer of income, creating disagreements about fiscal
policies among generations (Arai et al., 2018; Barseghyan &
Battaglini, 2016; Müller et al., 2016). To alleviate such consequences
and ensure fiscal sustainability, the member states of the European
Union (EU) introduced fiscal regulations to curb their debt, that is, the
Maastricht Treaty convergence criteria, which aimed to keep public
debt within 60% of GDP and government deficit within 3% of GDP
(De Grauwe, 1996). Accordingly, a number of EU countries implemen-
ted public system reforms to gather additional resources that could be
used to reduce the social impact of the crisis. Among them, Italy
makes for a particularly engaging case study since, due to its very high
public debt, fundamental structural reforms are needed not only for
the sake of debt reduction but also to ensure sufficient resources for
welfare expenditure. Yet, which should be the key criteria to be
applied to steer the country's reforms?
It is the policy makers' responsibility to determine the root causes
of inefficiency and the principles underpinning any process of re-
organization. To reach these targets, practitioners might pursue a
bottom-up approach, asking not only operators but also end users to
identify the procedures to be changed and the actions needed to
Received: 24 November 2022 Revised: 29 March 2023 Accepted: 12 June 2023
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2877
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Public Affairs published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
J Public Affairs. 2023;23:e2877. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of15
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2877

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex