Cross-Examining Causation Experts

AuthorDorothy Clay Sims
Pages941-968
22-1
CROSS:
CAUSATION EXPERTS
CHAPTER 22
CROSS-EXAMINING CAUSATION EXPERTS
INTRODUCTION: WHY IS THIS CHAPTER IMPORTANT?
I. GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
§22:01 Who Are These “Causation” Experts?
§22:02 Why Are They Being Hired?
§22:03 What Are They Really Saying?
[§22:04 Reserved]
II. OVERCOMING COMMON DEFENSES
§22:05 Conduct Thorough Background Investigation
§22:06 Get Initial Concessions
§22:07 Get Admissions About What the Expert Doesn’t Know
§22:08 Attack the Conclusions
§22:09 Challenge Causation
§22:09.1 Example: Personal Injury
§22:09.2 Example: Malpractice
§22:09.3 Rely on Principles of Criminal Forensics
APPENDIX
Appendix 22-A: Causation Expert—Deposition re Credentials, Training
Appendix 22-B: Challenging a Coding “Expert” (with Sample Motion in Limine)
FORMS
Form 22-1: Subpoena duces tecum Attachment for Causation Expert
Form 22-2: Motion in limine to Strike Defense Expert’s Testimony
(Τηισ παγε ιντεντιοναλλψ λεφτ βλανκ.)
CROSS:
CAUSATION EXPERTS

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT