Crime Reporting in Chicago: A Comparison of Police and Victim Survey Data, 1999–2018

Published date01 August 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221098053
AuthorMaribeth L. Rezey,Janet L. Lauritsen
Date01 August 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Crime Reporting
in Chicago: A
Comparison of Police
and Victim Survey
Data, 19992018
Maribeth L. Rezey
1
and Janet L. Lauritsen
2
Abstract
Objectives: A critical unknown in any jurisdiction is the scope of crime that is
not brought to the attention of police. This study provides a unique com-
parison of Chicago crime rates using both police and victimization survey
data. Levels of crime reporting and the reasons victims provide for or
against reporting crime to the police are examined. Patterns are compared
to those found for other large U.S. cities. Methods: Data for Chicago resi-
dents from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) are used to
estimate serious violence and burglary rates, levels of reporting to the
police, and residentsjustif‌ications for reporting or not reporting. Levels
and trends in NCVS and Chicago Police Department rates of serious vio-
lence and burglary are compared. Results: The NCVS data show that
while Chicago residents typically experience higher rates of these crimes
1
Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2
Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO,
USA
Corresponding Author:
Maribeth L. Rezey, Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Loyola University Chicago,
1032 W. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Email: mrezey@LUC.edu
Article
Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency
2023, Vol. 60(5) 664699
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00224278221098053
journals.sagepub.com/home/jrc
than residents of other large cities, they report these crimes to the police
at mostly similar rates. Reasons for and against reporting these crimes to
the police are generally similar to victims elsewhere. Conclusions: Despite
a documented history of distrust in the police, Chicago residents do not
appear to have notably lower rates of reporting serious violence or bur-
glary to the police than residents of other large cities.
Keywords
Chicago, crime trends, National Crime Victimization Survey, crime
reporting, violence
Introduction
A Midwestern U.S. city of just over two and a half million residents,
Chicago, Illinois is regularly featured in the media and is frequently
labeled as one of the nations most violent cities (see, e.g., CBS News
2020; Stebbins 2019). Chicago often receives national news attention
about its high rates of violence and pervasive community distrust in its
local law enforcement agencythe Chicago Police Department (Crabtree
2019). Following publicized videos of Chicago Police Department (CPD)
off‌icers engaging in use of force practices that many believed were a viola-
tion of the U.S. Constitution or federal law, the U.S. Department of Justice
began a yearlong investigation into the CPD in December 2015. In this
federal investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice (2017) determined
that the CPD engaged in systemic patterns and practices that violated resi-
dents constitutional rights. The U.S. Department of Justice (2017) further
asserted in its report that trust in the Chicago police has been broken by
systems that have allowed CPD off‌icers who violate the law to escape
accountability. This breach in trust has in turn eroded CPDs ability to effec-
tively prevent crime; in other words, trust and effectiveness in combating
violent crime are inextricably intertwined(p. 12).
Recent research by McCarthy and colleagues (2020) found that com-
plaints regarding police misconduct in many of Chicagos highly segregated
neighborhoods are grounded in a history of police misconduct recalled by
generations of Chicago residents (for a review of the history of police mis-
conduct in the CPD see Bleakley 2019). Consequently, the deterioration of
police-community relations has often left community members feeling more
isolated, more vulnerable to violence, and less inclined to seek out help
Rezey and Lauritsen 665
and/or protection from the police (Sodhi et al. 2020). In fact, the erosion of
trust between the CPD and Chicago residents is believed to have also led to
increasingly uncooperative victims and bystanders during police investiga-
tions of violent crime, even in the face of daily fatal and/or nonfatal shoot-
ings in their own neighborhoods (Madhani 2018). CPD off‌icials have
recently admitted that they need the communitys help to solve violent
crime in Chicago, but renewed efforts to restore relations with local citizens
are only just beginning (Sweeney and Gorner 2018).
As is the case for most places in the country, violence in the city of
Chicago has been measured using crime statistics obtained from its police
department, and violent incidents not reported to the police are absent
from off‌icial counts and rates of crime in the city. A critical unknown in
Chicago is the scope of crime that is not brought to the attention of
police. The extent of crime not reported to CPD, and the reasons why resi-
dents choose not to report their victimizations to the police, are of great
concern among city off‌icials and residents. Furthermore, because the CPD
is charged with preventing crime and victimization in the city, yet also pro-
vides the main source of data that can be used to verify whether they are suc-
cessful at executing this charge, distrust in the CPDs crime data and the
success of any prevention efforts is likely.
Levels of trust in the accuracy of police-based crime data and concerns
about levels of unreported crime are not unique to the city of Chicago.
The development of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) (pre-
viously known as the National Crime Survey), was prompted by these same
concerns about crime in the U.S. in the late 1960s (see, e.g., Groves and
Cork 2008). Developing the capacity for the NCVS to provide subnational
estimates of crime has long been viewed as an important goal of the data,
particularly because many jurisdictions do not have the resources to
conduct their own local or state victimization surveys (Langton, Planty,
and Lynch 2017). The Bureau of Justice Statistics has been working to
develop NCVS-based subnational estimates of victimization using a
variety of methodological strategies (see https://bjs.ojp.gov/subnational-
estimates-program). In preliminary analyzes, we found that the NCVS
public-use data could be used to estimate criminal victimization and crime
reporting rates for the city of Chicago, thus providing a rare opportunity
to compare victimization survey and police data for a large U.S. city.
This study seeks to better understand the level and trend in crime rates
and in crime reporting and non-reporting behaviors in Chicago for the
period 19992018. Through the triangulation of data sources, we accom-
plish in this study what many other studies cannot; we are able to directly
666 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 60(5)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT