Cracks in the Rainbow: Group Commonality as a Basis for Latino and African-American Political Coalitions

Published date01 June 2003
Date01 June 2003
AuthorKaren M. Kaufmann
DOI10.1177/106591290305600208
Subject MatterArticles
There is power in numbers, and the increasing pro-
portion of ethnic and racial minorities in the United
States could represent significant consequences for its
electoral politics. Urban settings have long been seen as the
primary locus of minority power and minority politics,
however election outcomes in large states such as Texas,
California, Florida, Illinois, and New York now also fre-
quently hinge on the political decisions of their growing
non-white communities. And given the size and importance
of these states to the electoral college, minority voters are
also salient to presidential candidates. We are in an era of
electoral politics where minority voters will not only be
increasingly more prevalent, but undoubtedly more conse-
quential as well.
In spite of these growing numbers, political alliances are
still essential for the full force of the minority vote to be felt
at the ballot box. And yet notwithstanding the apparently
rational incentives for minority coalition building, there is
little evidence of formal or even informal coalitions between
the nation’s two largest minority groups, African-Americans
and Latinos (Meier and Stewart 1991; Rich 1996). The
focus of this article is on mass attitudes and the propensity
of African -Americans and Latin os to build elec toral
alliances. The theoretical premise of this work is that per-
ceived commonality between blacks and Latinos is integral
to constructing political associations as the mass level.
Recent public opinion data point to an asymmetry in the
affinity that African-Americans and Latinos have for one
another; blacks see much greater levels of intergroup com-
monality than do Latinos (Kaufmann 2003). Understanding
the factors that lead to this asymmetry motivates this
research. In essence, this article looks at two central ques-
tions: (1) What factors correspond to higher levels of Latino
affinity for African-Americans? (2) How much future poten-
tial is there for Latino participation in minority oriented
political alliances?
THE BASIS FOR MINORITY COALITIONS
F rom a theoret ical basis, the question of whether or not
Latinos and African-American s will join political forces has
often been approached from the standpoint of shared inter-
ests vers us interg r oup competition (Meier and Stewart
1991;McClain and Karnig 1990; McClain and Ta u b e r
1998; Kaufmann 2003). As many students of minority pol-
itics aptly suggest, Latinos and African-Americans share
similar objective circumstances in the United States. Both
a re economically disadvantaged relative to whites; both
experience substantial discrimination in housing, educa-
tion, and employment; and both advocate for enlarging the
social welfare state. In spite of these shared interests, com-
petition over jobs, educational re s o u rces, housing, an d
political power often place blacks and Latinos in conflict
against one anot her, and this conflict can act as a powerf u l
b a r rier to political alliance (Garcia and de La Garza 1977;
H e n ry 1980; Johnson and Oliver, 1989; Waldinger 1996;
Borjas 1999).
More telling, perhaps, than this theoretical debate, is the
empirical observation that there are few, if any, real exam-
ples of strong political coalitions between blacks and Lati-
nos, while there are many examples of political conflict
199
Cracks in the Rainbow:
Group Commonality as a Basis for
Latino and African-American Political Coalitions
KAREN M. KAUFMANN, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT COLLEGE PARK
The focus of this article is on mass attitudes and the propensity of blacks and Latinos to build electoral coali-
tions. The theoretical argument is that perceived commonality between Latinos and African-Americans is
essential to constructing mass political alliances. Using recent public opinion data, this research explores the
levels of perceived commonality between blacks and Latinos and in particular studies the process by which
Latinos come to feel close to African-Americans. This article tests four main hypotheses: pan-Latino affinity,
acculturation, perceived discrimination, and racial identity. Findings suggest that pan-Latino affinity is a robust
predictor of Latino/black commonality, but that long-term Latino political acculturation, in its current form, is
unlikely to result in particularly high levels of closeness to blacks. The conclusion of the article points to the
important role that Latino leadership and political organizations play in promoting strong pan-ethnic identi-
ties and suggests that the prospects for future coalitions between African-Americans and Latinos rest, in part,
on the development of these more inclusive Latino orientations.
NOTE: An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meet-
ing of the American Political Science Association, Washington
D.C. 2000. I am particularly indebted to Richard Morin of the
Washington Post, for providing me with the data for this project. I
am also grateful to Jim Gimpel, Irwin Morris, Ric Uslaner, and sev-
eral anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.
Political Research Quarterly,Vol. 56, No. 2 (June 2003): pp. 199-210

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT