Court Error Testimony.

Byline: Derek Hawkins

WI Court of Appeals District IV

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Chris Feller

Case No.: 2019AP318

Officials: BLANCHARD, J.

Focus: Court Error Testimony

Chris Feller appeals a judgment of conviction for driving on a freeway in excess of the 70-miles-per-hour speed limit, in violation of WIS. STAT. 346.57(4)(gm)2. Feller does not argue that the circuit court clearly erred in crediting the testimony of a radar-equipped state trooper that Feller drove 81 m.p.h. in a 70 m.p.h. zone. Indeed, Feller admitted at the court trial that he drove 81 m.p.h. Instead, Feller argues that the court should have credited his testimony that his speeding was justified because it was necessary to avoid a collision with a dangerous tailgater, and that this justification is a defense. Feller testified that he rapidly accelerated to 81 m.p.h. as he passed another vehicle because he was being dangerously tailgated. But the court credited the trooper's testimony that Feller was not being tailgated at the time. I assume without deciding that necessity, or "legal justification," based on the conduct of a nonpolice actor could be a viable defense to a strict liability speeding citation, and affirm because Feller fails to show that the court clearly erred in discrediting Feller's testimony and crediting the trooper's testimony on the topic of dangerous tailgating.

Appellate courts do not set aside circuit court findings of fact on appeal unless the findings are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. 805.17(2). It is for the circuit courts to resolve conflicts in testimony and to determine the credibility of witnesses. Global Steel Prods. Corp. v. Ecklund, 2002 WI App 91, 10, 253 Wis. 2d 588, 644 N.W.2d 269. Appellate courts search the record for evidence to support factual findings of a circuit court, and do not search for findings that the circuit court could have made but did not. Id. The State was required to prove its speeding case against Feller through "evidence that is clear, satisfactory and convincing." See WIS. STAT. 345.45.

On appeal, Feller presents a misleading statement of the case, omitting key testimony by the trooper, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT