Corruption and the shadow economy at the regional level

AuthorRobert Gillanders,Sinikka Parviainen
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12517
Published date01 November 2018
Date01 November 2018
REGULAR ARTICLE
Corruption and the shadow economy at the
regional level
Robert Gillanders
1
|
Sinikka Parviainen
2
1
Dublin City University, and Hanken
School of Economics
2
Aalto University School of Business
Correspondence
Robert Gillanders, Room Q251, Dublin
City University Business School, Dublin
9, Ireland.
Email: rgillanders@gmail.com
Funding information
Foundation for Economic Education
(Liikesivistysrahasto)
Abstract
The links between corruption and the shadow economy
have mostly been studied empirically at the country level.
This paper contributes to this literature by examining the
relationship at the sub-national level. We also add value
to the existing literature in that we employ data capturing
the extent to which the shadow economy and corruption
are viewed as problems by firms as opposed to the stan-
dard measures of corruption and the size of the shadow
economy. Using World Bank Enterprise Survey data, we
find that sub-national units in which more firms report
that corruption is an obstacle to their operations also tend
to have more firms that report that the practices of infor-
mal competitors are an obstacle and vice versa. Sub-
Saharan Africa is different in that neither of these find-
ings is evident in that sub-sample.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
This paper contributes to an interesting and important literature that has sought to establish the
existence and nature of the relationship between corruption and the shadow economy. The
weight of the existing evidence, which we discuss below, suggests that corruption and the sha-
dow economy are complements in the sense that countries with a larger shadow economy tend
to perform worse on various indices of perceived corruption. We contribute to this literature by
taking the analysis to the regional (or sub-national) level using data from the World Banks
Enterprise Surveys (ES). This offers a new perspective, increases the available sample size, and
exploits the within-country variation of these important variables. It also considers meaningfully
different measures of both corruption and the shadow economy in that we examine the extent to
which they are viewed as problematic, rather than their prevalence. We ask whether sub-national
regions in which more firms say that corruption is a problem for their operations also have more
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12517
Rev Dev Econ. 2018;22:17291743. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode ©2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
|
1729

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT