Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance of Banks in Muslim Economies: The Role of Institutions

Published date01 February 2021
AuthorMudeer Ahmed Khattak
Date01 February 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2156
ACADEMIC PAPER
Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance of Banks in
Muslim Economies: The Role of Institutions
Mudeer Ahmed Khattak
Department of Finance, Universiti Kuala
Lumpur Business School, Universiti Kuala
Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Correspondence
Mudeer Ahmed Khattak, Universiti Kuala
Lumpur Business School, Universiti Kuala
Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Email: mudeerkhattak@gmail.com
Sustainability performance (SP) provides firms with the opportunities that if strategi-
cally handled could improve the financial performance of these firms through reputa-
tion building. This research aims to investigate the impact of SP on the bank's
performance in Muslim countries. This research further investigates the role of insti-
tutions in moderating the relationship between SP and the banks' financial perfor-
mance. It is found that banks with higher SP tend to have better financial
performance. Furthermore, the marginal results suggest that the impact of SP is
greater for banks in countries with greater institutional quality. These findings are
robust to different proxies of financial performance. It is imperative not only to
report sustainability practices, but it is equally important to publicize these activities.
The sustainable business models would create value for the banks if properly man-
aged and communicated well. This can be made more effective with strong institu-
tions in the country. Moreover, the results are suggesting that banks can enjoy more
through contributing to society, doing their part in the equitable distribution of
wealth, social justice, and economic wellbeing.
JEL CLASSIFICATION
M14; Q01; A13; G21; G30
1|INTRODUCTION
Sustainability practiceshave gained much attentionin recent years with
increasing awareness among the stakeholders of the financial system.
Within sustainability practices, social and environmental concerns are
even of more importance amongpolicymakers and theresearchers. The
terms corporate social responsibility (CSR), environmental social and
governance (ESG), and corporate sustainability are often used alterna-
tively. For clarity, the term sustainability is used in this research. Banks
that have greater financial performance are expected to show extra
effort in promoting sustainability practices. Researchers and practi-
tioners are still not sure of the impact of sustainability practices on the
overallperformance of the banks.The increasing globaltrend in the sus-
tainability practices investments and the information disclosures tell a
lot about the importance of sustainability activities. Among the largest
250 corporations in the world, less than80% reported their sustainabil-
ity performance (SP) in the year 2008 (KPMG, 2008), which currently
stands at 93%according to KPMG (2017).
The management might look at investment in sustainability
practices as an expense on banks shoulders where it is tradition-
ally believed that anything beyond the obligatory investments is
the additional costs and these investments reduce firms earnings
or they might capitalize this through reputation building (Clark &
Viehs, 2014; Margolis, Elfenbein, & Walsh, 2009). Kim and
Lyon (2015) suggest, the entire environmental regulatory para-
digm is built around the idea that firms must be forced to make
environmental improvements because they would otherwise find
them costly or unprofitable, and thus not undertake them on
their own.
The proponents of sustainability practices argue that adopting
sustainability investments results in greater financial performance,
thus increased firm overall value (Fatemi, Fooladi, & Tehranian, 2015;
Malik, 2015). The disclosures of such investments result in reduced
information asymmetry and adverse selection costs. Moreover, the
banks' management can use these investments as a tool for relation-
ship building (Healy & Palepu, 2001; Jensen, 2002). These
Received: 18 February 2020 Revised: 13 March 2020 Accepted: 9 April 2020
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2156
J Public Affairs. 2021;21:e2156. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1of10
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2156

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT