Contractual Hazard, Political Hazard and FDI Ownership Structure in Joint‐venture Enterprises in China

AuthorTing Jiang,Mingyue Fang,Yuxiao Zhang,Huihua Nie
Date01 February 2016
Published date01 February 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12211
Contractual Hazard, Political Hazard and FDI
Ownership Structure in Joint-venture Enterprises in
China
Yuxiao Zhang, Mingyue Fang, Ting Jiang, and Huihua Nie*
Abstract
This paper investigates how institutional environments, especially the contractual hazard and the political
hazard, affect foreign investors’ share ratios in joint-venture enterprises in China. We build a model
combining Transaction Cost Economics and Property Rights Theory to describe the tradeoff that foreign
investors face between choosing a larger share ratio and a smaller one. We argue that when the
contractual hazard increases, foreign investors request larger shares to avoid being held up by their
domestic partners, and when the political hazard increases, they hold smaller shares to circumvent the
local government’s grabbing hand. Moreover, the effect of the contractual hazard is channeled through
enterprises’ asset specificity. These theoretical predictions are verified by studying the relationship
between the ownership structure of Chinese manufacturing joint-venture enterprises and the provincial-
level institutions they are embedded in.
1. Introduction
Since the opening-up policy in 1978, foreign direct investment (FDI) in China has
grown dramatically. An FDI project may take the form of establishing a wholly
owned subsidiary or entering into a joint venture with local investors. The choice of
ownership structure is a primary decision for foreign investors to make when
organizing their business activities since it has significant performance implications
(Brouthers, 2002). It is also a complicated choice because the institutional
environments of the host country are more unfamiliar to multinational firms than to
domestic firms (Henisz and Williamson, 1999). Not only do foreign investors try to
choose the right ownership structure when they enter a new market, but they also
make necessary adjustments in response to changing incentives in subsequent years
following entry. Our data show that during the sample periods more than 70% of
joint-venture enterprises (JVEs, hereafter) have changed their foreign share ratios
and more than 40% of JVEs have shifted between majority foreign control and
minority foreign control after registration. A natural question is, therefore, what
can account for the variation in the ownership structure of FDI JVEs in China?
The existing literature has attempted the question from various perspectives. The
learning perspective (Barkema and Vermeulen, 1998) treats JVEs as an instrument
*Nie: School of Economics, Renmin University of China, No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, 100872, Beijing,
China. Tel: +86-1082500210; Fax: +86-1082500256; E-mail: niehuihua@vip.163.com. Zhang and Jiang:
School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China. Fang: School of Economics, Capital
University of Economics and Business, Beijing, China. The authors wish to thank the participants of the
CFOS 2014 Conference, the IEFS 2014 Conference and the Henan Symposium 2014 for their insightful
comments. Additionally, they wish to thank the anonymous referee for his helpful suggestions. Financial
support is provided by the Outstanding Innovative Talents Cultivation Funded Programs 2014 of Renmin
University of China for Yuxiao Zhang and the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young
Professionals for Huihua Nie.
Review of Development Economics, 20(1), 14–24, 2016
DOI:10.1111/rode.12211
©2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT