Contents
| Library | A Virginia-Specific Summary Guide: Attorney-Client Privilege & Work Product Doctrine (Virginia CLE) (2016 Ed.) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| About the Author | |
| Preface | |
| Instructions for Using the Online Database | |
| CHAPTER 1: ORGANIZATION OF THE OUTLINE | |
| 1.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 1.2 | ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE |
| 1.3 | CLIENTS |
| 1.4 | LAWYERS |
| 1.5 | CONTENT OF COMMUNICATIONS |
| 1.6 | CONTEXT OF COMMUNICATIONS |
| 1.7 | PRIVILEGE PROTECTION FOR INTERNAL CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS |
| 1.8 | WAIVER OF THE PRIVILEGE |
| 1.9 | WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION |
| 1.10 | PROTECTED CONTENT |
| 1.11 | PROTECTION FOR INTERNAL CORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS |
| 1.12 | OVERCOMING WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION |
| 1.13 | WAIVER OF THE WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION |
| 1.14 | LITIGATION OVERVIEW |
| 1.15 | SOURCE AND CHOICE OF LAW |
| 1.16 | ASSERTING THE PROTECTIONS |
| 1.17 | LITIGATING THE PROTECTIONS |
| CHAPTER 2: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE: INTRODUCTION AND BASIC PRINCIPLES | |
| 2.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.2 | ETHICS DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY CONTRASTED |
| 2.3 | SOCIETAL BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE PRIVILEGE |
| 2.4 | THE PRIVILEGE'S ABSOLUTE PROTECTION |
| 2.5 | CLIENTS' AND LAWYERS' INABILITY TO CREATE OR DISCLAIM PRIVILEGE PROTECTION |
| 2.6 | CONSENSUS FORMULATION |
| 2.7 | KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PRIVILEGE |
| 2.8 | TYPES OF PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS |
| 2.9 | CURRENT TRENDS AND THE FUTURE |
| CHAPTER 3: CLIENTS: INTRODUCTION AND BASIC PRINCIPLES | |
| 3.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 3.2 | EXISTENCE OF AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP |
| 3.3 | CLIENT'S ACTIONS AND UNCOMMUNICATED STATEMENTS |
| 3.4 | CLIENT'S OWNERSHIP OF THE PRIVILEGE |
| CHAPTER 4: CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS | |
| 4.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 4.2 | PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS |
| 4.3 | INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS |
| 4.4 | GOVERNMENT ENTITIES AS CLIENTS |
| 4.5 | NON-CORPORATE INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS |
| CHAPTER 5: JOINT CLIENTS | |
| 5.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 5.2 | NUMBER OF JOINTLY REPRESENTED CLIENTS |
| 5.3 | EXISTENCE OF A JOINT REPRESENTATION |
| 5.4 | EFFECT OF A JOINT REPRESENTATION: ETHICS RULES |
| 5.5 | EFFECT OF A JOINT REPRESENTATION: PRIVILEGE PRINCIPLES |
| 5.6 | WAIVER IN JOINT REPRESENTATIONS |
| 5.7 | ADVERSITY AMONG JOINTLY REPRESENTED CLIENTS |
| 5.8 | COMPARISON TO COMMON INTEREST AGREEMENTS |
| CHAPTER 6: CORPORATE CLIENTS | |
| 6.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 6.2 | DEFINING THE "CLIENT" WITHIN A CORPORATE ENTITY |
| 6.3 | COMMUNICATIONS WITHIN A CORPORATE FAMILY |
| 6.4 | EFFECT OF CORPORATE STOCK TRANSACTIONS |
| 6.5 | EFFECT OF CORPORATE ASSET TRANSACTIONS |
| 6.6 | REPRESENTATION OF CORPORATE AFFILIATES IN THE TRANSACTION |
| 6.7 | AGREEMENTS ALTERING THE PRIVILEGE'S OWNERSHIP |
| 6.8 | BANKRUPT AND DEFUNCT CORPORATIONS |
| 6.9 | SEPARATE AND JOINT REPRESENTATIONS OF EMPLOYEES |
| 6.10 | UPJOHN STANDARD FOR COMMUNICATIONS |
| 6.11 | "NEED TO KNOW" STANDARD FOR COMMUNICATIONS |
| 6.12 | COMMUNICATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES |
| 6.13 | COMMUNICATIONS WITH INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS |
| 6.14 | COMMUNICATIONS WITH AGENTS/CONSULTANTS |
| 6.15 | RIGHT TO PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS |
| CHAPTER 7: THE "FIDUCIARY EXCEPTION" | |
| 7.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 7.2 | HISTORIC TRUST PRINCIPLE |
| 7.3 | SHAREHOLDERS' RIGHT TO PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS |
| 7.4 | NAMING THE EXPANDED DOCTRINE |
| 7.5 | COURTS' CONTINUING DEBATE ABOUT APPLICABILITY |
| 7.6 | ABSENCE OF "GOOD CAUSE" REQUIREMENT |
| 7.7 | EXAMPLES TO WHICH EXCEPTION APPLIES |
| 7.8 | EXAMPLES TO WHICH EXCEPTION DOES NOT APPLY |
| 7.9 | LIMITATION TO FIDUCIARY FUNCTIONS |
| 7.10 | "SETTLOR EXCEPTION" |
| 7.11 | "LIABILITY EXCEPTION" |
| 7.12 | OTHER FIDUCIARY EXCEPTION ISSUES |
| 7.13 | APPLICATION TO LAW FIRMS |
| CHAPTER 8: CLIENT AGENTS/CONSULTANTS | |
| 8.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 8.2 | CHARACTERIZATION OF CLIENT AGENTS |
| 8.3 | CLIENT AGENTS NECESSARY TO TRANSMIT COMMUNICATIONS |
| 8.4 | DEFINING THE LEVEL OF NECESSITY |
| 8.5 | CLIENT AGENTS WITHIN PRIVILEGE PROTECTION |
| 8.6 | CLIENT AGENTS OUTSIDE PRIVILEGE PROTECTION |
| 8.7 | IMPORTANCE OF A CHOICE OF LAW ANALYSIS |
| 8.8 | "FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT" DOCTRINE |
| 8.9 | CHANGE IN AGENTS' ROLES |
| 8.10 | CLIENT AGENTS VERSUS LAWYER AGENTS |
| 8.11 | APPLICATION OF THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE |
| 8.12 | IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATING CLIENTS |
| CHAPTER 9: LAWYERS | |
| 9.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 9.2 | NONLAWYERS |
| 9.3 | PATENT AGENTS |
| 9.4 | NONLAWYERS THOUGHT BY CLIENTS TO BE LAWYERS |
| 9.5 | LAWYERS NOT ABLE TO PRACTICE LAW |
| 9.6 | MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE ISSUES |
| 9.7 | IN-HOUSE LAWYERS |
| 9.8 | FOREIGN NONLAWYERS |
| 9.9 | FOREIGN LAWYERS |
| 9.10 | WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE CONTRASTED |
| CHAPTER 10: LAWYER AGENTS/CONSULTANTS | |
| 10.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 10.2 | PRIVILEGE PROTECTION FOR LAWYER AGENTS |
| 10.3 | COMPARISON TO CLIENT AGENTS |
| 10.4 | LAWYER AGENTS TRANSMITTING PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS |
| 10.5 | OTHER LAWYER AGENTS |
| 10.6 | SCOPE OF AVAILABLE PROTECTION |
| 10.7 | PROTECTED LAWYER AGENTS VERSUS UNPROTECTED CLIENT AGENTS |
| 10.8 | NONDISPOSITIVE FACTORS |
| 10.9 | "NEED" FOR THE AGENT'S ASSISTANCE |
| 10.10 | BEST PRACTICES |
| 10.11 | LAWYER AGENTS INSIDE THE PRIVILEGE |
| 10.12 | LAWYER AGENTS OUTSIDE THE PRIVILEGE |
| 10.13 | "MORPHING" OF A LAWYER AGENT ROLE |
| 10.14 | LAWYER AGENTS PLAYING DUAL ROLES |
| 10.15 | NON-TESTIFYING EXPERTS |
| 10.16 | LAWYER AGENT'S ROLE IN WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE PROTECTION |
| CHAPTER 11: UNPROTECTED BACKGROUND INFORMATION | |
| 11.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 11.2 | COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT BACKGROUND INFORMATION |
| 11.3 | FACT OF THE REPRESENTATION |
| 11.4 | GENERAL SUBJECT MATTER OF THE REPRESENTATION |
| 11.5 | UNPROTECTED FEE INFORMATION |
| 11.6 | PROTECTED FEE INFORMATION |
| 11.7 | LAWYERS' BILLS |
| 11.8 | BACKGROUND FACTS ABOUT ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS |
| 11.9 | SUBJECT MATTER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS |
| CHAPTER 12: CONTENT AND "COMMUNICATION" ELEMENT | |
| 12.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 12.2 | APPROACH OF THIS OUTLINE |
| 12.3 | FORMS OF TRANSMISSION AND SUBSTANCE |
| 12.4 | CLIENTS' ACTS |
| 12.5 | LAWYERS' ACTS |
| CHAPTER 13: CONTENT: LEGAL ADVICE REQUIREMENT | |
| 13.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 13.2 | COMMON MISPERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PRIVILEGE |
| 13.3 | COMMUNICATIONS DESERVING PRIVILEGE PROTECTION |
| 13.4 | BASIC PRINCIPLES |
| 13.5 | ANALYZING EACH COMMUNICATION |
| 13.6 | ANALYZING EACH COMMUNICATION |
| CHAPTER 14: ANALYZING THE LAWYER'S ROLE | |
| 14.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 14.2 | LAWYER'S ROLE IS NOT DISPOSITIVE |
| 14.3 | LAWYERS INVOLVED IN INVESTIGATIONS |
| 14.4 | LAWYERS INVOLVED IN OTHER MATTERS |
| 14.5 | IN-HOUSE LAWYERS |
| 14.6 | LAWYERS AS CONDUITS TO OR FROM CLIENTS |
| 14.7 | WORK PRODUCT |
| CHAPTER 15: BUSINESS AND OTHER NONLEGAL ADVICE | |
| 15.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 15.2 | DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN LEGAL AND BUSINESS ADVICE |
| 15.3 | APPLYING THE "PRIMARY PURPOSE" TEST |
| 15.4 | WIDESPREAD INTRACORPORATE CIRCULATION |
| 15.5 | OTHER TYPES OF NONLEGAL ADVICE |
| CHAPTER 16: CLIENT-TO-LAWYER COMMUNICATIONS | |
| 16.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 16.2 | UNCOMMUNICATED CLIENT DOCUMENTS |
| 16.3 | CLIENT-TO-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS |
| 16.4 | CLIENT'S EXPLICIT OR IMPLICIT REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE: INTRODUCTION |
| 16.5 | UNPROTECTED HISTORICAL FACTS |
| 16.6 | PRE-EXISTING DOCUMENTS RECEIVED FROM CLIENT |
| 16.7 | CLIENT'S NON-SUBSTANTIVE COMMUNICATIONS |
| 16.8 | CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS RELAYING HISTORICAL FACTS |
| 16.9 | REVIEW OF DRAFT DOCUMENTS |
| 16.10 | DRAFTS CLIENTS INTEND TO DISCLOSE |
| 16.11 | CLIENTS' ACTS AFTER ADVICE IS RECEIVED |
| CHAPTER 17: LAWYER-TO-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS | |
| 17.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 17.2 | UNCOMMUNICATED LAWYER DOCUMENTS |
| 17.3 | LAWYER-TO-LAWYER COMMUNICATIONS |
| 17.4 | RULES GOVERNING LAWYER-TO-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS |
| 17.5 | LAWYERS' REQUESTS FOR FACTS FROM CLIENTS |
| 17.6 | HISTORICAL FACTS |
| 17.7 | HISTORICAL FACTS WITHIN THE LAWYER'S KNOWLEDGE |
| 17.8 | PRE-EXISTING DOCUMENTS THAT LAWYERS GIVE TO THEIR CLIENTS |
| 17.9 | LAWYER'S DOCUMENTS RELAYING FACTS TO CLIENTS |
| 17.10 | DRAFTS |
| 17.11 | PROTECTION FOR LAWYER-CREATED DRAFTS |
| 17.12 | LEGAL ADVICE: GENERAL RULES |
| 17.13 | PROTECTED AND UNPROTECTED LAWYER ADVICE |
| 17.14 | LAWYER'S ACTIONS |
| 17.15 | EXPECTATION OF DISCLOSURE |
| 17.16 | DISCOVERY ABOUT DISCOVERY |
| 17.17 | WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION |
| CHAPTER 18: THE CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION | |
| 18.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 18.2 | APPLICABILITY TO FUTURE WRONGDOING |
| 18.3 | WRONGDOING COVERED BY THE EXCEPTION |
| 18.4 | CONNECTION BETWEEN THE WRONGDOING AND THE COMMUNICATION |
| 18.5 | KNOWLEDGE OF THE WRONGDOING |
| 18.6 | APPLYING THE EXCEPTION |
| 18.7 | PROCESS FOR APPLYING THE EXCEPTION |
| 18.8 | LATER ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH THE EXCEPTION |
| 18.9 | FIRST STEP: IN CAMERA REVIEW |
| 18.10 | SECOND STEP: EVIDENCE AND HEARING |
| 18.11 | STANDARD FOR OVERCOMING THE PRIVILEGE |
| 18.12 | EXPANSION OF THE EXCEPTION |
| CHAPTER 19: PRESENCE OF THIRD PARTIES | |
| 19.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 19.2 | "EXPECTATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY" ELEMENT |
| 19.3 | CHARACTERIZING THIRD PARTIES' INVOLVEMENT |
| 19.4 | EXPECTATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY VERSUS WAIVER |
| 19.5 | SLOPPY HANDLING OF PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS .. |
| 19.6 | UNINVITED THIRD PARTIES |
| 19.7 | INVITED THIRD PARTIES |
| 19.8 | INTRACORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS WITH CORPORATE EMPLOYEES |
| 19.9 | INVITED CLIENT AGENTS |
| 19.10 | FAMILY MEMBERS |
| 19.11 | INVITED LAWYER AGENTS |
| 19.12 | ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS |
| 19.13 | PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS ON WORK COMPUTERS |
| 19.14 | SLOPPY DESTRUCTION OF PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS |
| 19.15 | WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE |
| CHAPTER 20: THE JOINT DEFENSE/COMMON INTEREST DOCTRINE | |
| 20.1 | INTRODUCTION |
| 20.2 | COMMON INTEREST DOCTRINE VERSUS JOINT REPRESENTATIONS |
| 20.3 | HISTORY OF THE COMMON INTEREST DOCTRINE |
| 20.4 | NATURE OF THE PROTECTION |
| 20.5 | LITIGATION ELEMENT |
| 20.6 | CREATION OF THE PROTECTION |
| 20.7 | TYPES OF COMMON INTEREST SUPPORTING AGREEMENT |
| 20.8 | DEGREE OF COMMONALITY REQUIRED |
| 20.9 | LAWYERS' INVOLVEMENT |
| 20.10 | COURTS' APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE |
| 20.11 | EXAMPLES OF ASSERTIONS OF THE DOCTRINE |
| 20.12 | DANGER OF A SUBJECT MATTER WAIVER |
| 20.13 | APPLICABILITY IN THE INSURANCE CONTEXT |
| 20.14 | LATER |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting