Communicating Reform: Testing an Apology for Police History as a Supplement to a Policy Communication
Author | Mark Benton |
DOI | 10.1177/02750740211048887 |
Published date | 01 January 2022 |
Date | 01 January 2022 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
Communicating Reform: Testing an
Apology for Police History as a
Supplement to a Policy Communication
Mark Benton
Abstract
Policing in the United States has a racist history, with negative implications for its legitimacy among African Americans today.
Legitimacy is important for policing’s effective operations. Community policing may improve policing’s legitimacy but is
difficult to implement with fidelity and does not address history. An apology for policing’s racist history may work as a
legitimizing supplement to community policing. On the other hand, an apology may be interpreted as words without changes
in practices. Using a survey vignette experiment on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to sample African Ameri cans, this research
tests the legitimizing effect of a supplemental apology for historical police racism during a community policing policy
announcement. Statistical findings suggest that supplementing the communication with an apology imparted little to no
additional legitimacy on policing among respondents. Qualitative data suggested a rationale: Apologies need not indicate
future equitable behavior or policy implementation, with implementation itself seeming crucial for police legitimacy
improvements.
Keywords
policing, apologia, governing, police legitimacy, experiments
Introduction
Governments sometimes apologize for their mistakes, but
apologies do not always make governments more legitimate.
Policing in the United States has a racist history that creates
legitimacy problems among African Americans today. This
research finds that supplementing a community policing
announcement with an apology for historical police racism
is unlikely to substantially improve policing’s legitimacy
among African Americans. These findings suggest that
improving police legitimacy among African Americans
may require more concrete policy implementation.
In the Southern United States, the earliest police depart-
ments formed to police slaves (Turner et al., 2006). These
slave patrols monitored slaves’activities, checked freed
Blacks for documents to ensure that they were not slaves,
caught runaways, and prevented gatherings (Durr, 2015).
Slave patrols were an important part of legal systems that
maintained slavery (Lee & Robinson, 2019; Spruill, 2016).
Police departments maintained their role of racial control
after the American Civil War (Steffens, 2018; Wade,
1996). In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Americans
feared urbanization and organized police departments
formed to maintain the racial status quo (Potter, 2013).
Officers enforced segregation and tolerated crimes that
were committed to maintain racial hierarchies (English,
2009). Officers sometimes participated in lynchings and
departments often did nothing to prevent racial violence
(Fischer-Stewart, 2017; King, 2011; Teague, 2019).
During America’s civil rights movement, as African
American activists and their allies argued for equality,
police officers sprayed them with fire hoses. Police abused
icons like Martin Luther King Jr. (Andrews & Gaby,
2015). National media shared images of protests and they
spread across the country. Police departments became
emblematic of racial conflict in the United States (Corrigan,
2017; Rafail et al., 2012; Spratt, 2008). Recent movements
(Blessett, 2017; Moore, 2018) against police racism illustrate
policing’s ongoing legitimacy problem among African
Americans.
Improving police legitimacy today may require addressing
historical misdeeds. Apologia, the study and practice of
effective apologizing (Ware & Linkugel, 1973), is one
University of Missouri, Columbia—Harry S. TrumanSchool of Government
and Public Affairs, Columbia, MO, USA
Corresponding Author:
Mark Benton, University of Missouri, Columbia—Harry S. TrumanSchool of
Government and Public Affairs, 907 University Ave., Columbia, MO 65202,
USA.
Email: mbenton@mail.missouri.edu
Article
American Review of Public Administration
2022, Vol. 52(1) 46–60
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/02750740211048887
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp
To continue reading
Request your trial