Communicating Reform: Testing an Apology for Police History as a Supplement to a Policy Communication

AuthorMark Benton
DOI10.1177/02750740211048887
Published date01 January 2022
Date01 January 2022
Subject MatterArticles
Communicating Reform: Testing an
Apology for Police History as a
Supplement to a Policy Communication
Mark Benton
Abstract
Policing in the United States has a racist history, with negative implications for its legitimacy among African Americans today.
Legitimacy is important for policings effective operations. Community policing may improve policings legitimacy but is
difcult to implement with delity and does not address history. An apology for policings racist history may work as a
legitimizing supplement to community policing. On the other hand, an apology may be interpreted as words without changes
in practices. Using a survey vignette experiment on Amazons Mechanical Turk to sample African Ameri cans, this research
tests the legitimizing effect of a supplemental apology for historical police racism during a community policing policy
announcement. Statistical ndings suggest that supplementing the communication with an apology imparted little to no
additional legitimacy on policing among respondents. Qualitative data suggested a rationale: Apologies need not indicate
future equitable behavior or policy implementation, with implementation itself seeming crucial for police legitimacy
improvements.
Keywords
policing, apologia, governing, police legitimacy, experiments
Introduction
Governments sometimes apologize for their mistakes, but
apologies do not always make governments more legitimate.
Policing in the United States has a racist history that creates
legitimacy problems among African Americans today. This
research nds that supplementing a community policing
announcement with an apology for historical police racism
is unlikely to substantially improve policings legitimacy
among African Americans. These ndings suggest that
improving police legitimacy among African Americans
may require more concrete policy implementation.
In the Southern United States, the earliest police depart-
ments formed to police slaves (Turner et al., 2006). These
slave patrols monitored slavesactivities, checked freed
Blacks for documents to ensure that they were not slaves,
caught runaways, and prevented gatherings (Durr, 2015).
Slave patrols were an important part of legal systems that
maintained slavery (Lee & Robinson, 2019; Spruill, 2016).
Police departments maintained their role of racial control
after the American Civil War (Steffens, 2018; Wade,
1996). In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Americans
feared urbanization and organized police departments
formed to maintain the racial status quo (Potter, 2013).
Ofcers enforced segregation and tolerated crimes that
were committed to maintain racial hierarchies (English,
2009). Ofcers sometimes participated in lynchings and
departments often did nothing to prevent racial violence
(Fischer-Stewart, 2017; King, 2011; Teague, 2019).
During Americas civil rights movement, as African
American activists and their allies argued for equality,
police ofcers sprayed them with re hoses. Police abused
icons like Martin Luther King Jr. (Andrews & Gaby,
2015). National media shared images of protests and they
spread across the country. Police departments became
emblematic of racial conict in the United States (Corrigan,
2017; Rafail et al., 2012; Spratt, 2008). Recent movements
(Blessett, 2017; Moore, 2018) against police racism illustrate
policings ongoing legitimacy problem among African
Americans.
Improving police legitimacy today may require addressing
historical misdeeds. Apologia, the study and practice of
effective apologizing (Ware & Linkugel, 1973), is one
University of Missouri, ColumbiaHarry S. TrumanSchool of Government
and Public Affairs, Columbia, MO, USA
Corresponding Author:
Mark Benton, University of Missouri, ColumbiaHarry S. TrumanSchool of
Government and Public Affairs, 907 University Ave., Columbia, MO 65202,
USA.
Email: mbenton@mail.missouri.edu
Article
American Review of Public Administration
2022, Vol. 52(1) 4660
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/02750740211048887
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT