Commonwealth v. Caton 4 Call's (Va.) Reports (1782)

Author:Leonard W. Levy
Pages:467
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 467

Decided by the highest court of Virginia in 1782, this case is a disputed precedent for the legitimacy of JUDICIAL REVIEW. The state constitution of 1776, which did not empower courts to void enactments in conflict with the constitution, authorized the governor to grant pardons except in impeachment cases. A statute on TREASON deprived the governor of his PARDONING POWER and vested it in the general assembly. Caton, having been sentenced to death for treason, claimed a pardon granted by the lower house, though the upper house refused to concur. The court had only to rule that the pardon was not valid.

Call's unreliable report of the case, a reconstruction made in 1827, indicates that the court considered the constitutionality of the statute on treason and that seven of the eight judges were of the opinion that the court had the power to declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional, though the court unanimously held the act constitutional. In fact, only one of the eight judges ruled the act unconstitutional, one held that it had no power to so rule, and another, GEORGE WYTHE, declared that the court had the power but need not exercise it in this case; he decided that the pardon had no force of law because it was not in conformity with the disputed act, which he found constitutional. A majority of the court, including Chief Justice...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP