Cloudy Ethics

AuthorJason Tashea
Pages30-32
30 || ABA JOURNAL APRIL 2018
SHUTTERSTOCK
Business of Law
||
SPECIAL EDITION
WITH A FUNERAL HOME IN ASHES and a n
insurance company refusi ng to pay benefits, the last
thing you’d expect to hear a bout is online security and
the cloud.
But that’s exactly what happ ened in 2014 when the
Holding Funeral Home lost a building in Ca stlewood,
Virginia , to a fire and Harleysville In surance Co. refused
to pay out the claim, alleg ing misrepresentation and
other issues.
During the invest igation, security video foota ge of the
incident was shared bet ween the insurer and the National
Insurance Cri me Bureau through the cloud storage ser-
vice Box. The investigat or who created the account didn’t
password-protect it . Pretty soon that account cont ained
the entirety of the plai nti’s case file, including priv ileged
information. Anyone who ha d a link could access it.
Sure enough, the opposing counsel s mistakenly
received acces s. After downloading the ent ire file,
the funeral home’s attorney s saw everything, including
privileged docu ments, but they did not notify the insur-
er’s attorneys, thi nking that privilege had be en waived.
At first, the insu rer and its lawyers seemed out of luck.
In 2017, U.S. Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent sided
with the funera l home’s attorneys in Harleysville Insuran ce
Co. v. Holding Funeral Home and de termined the failure to
limit permissions a nd create a password did waive priv ilege.
She wrote that it wa s “the cyberworld equivalent of leaving
its claims file on a bench in t he public square and telling its
counsel where they could find it .”
Luckily for the insurer, U.S. Dis trict Judge James P. Jones,
on appeal, rejected t he magistrate’s reasoning. Jones con-
cluded that the disclosure w as inadvertent and the unique
URL of 32 randomly ass igned characters created by B ox,
which was needed to a ccess the account, made it “impo ssible
for anyone, let alone a particu lar person connected with t he
case, to ac cidentally stumble across the Box folder.”
While failing at c ybersecurity basics , the judge determined
that the insurer ha d acted reasonably and priv ilege hadn’t
been waived.
BE REASONABLE
Whether for personal or professiona l applications, remote
storage has become t he standard for millions of Americ ans.
However, this and other internet-en abled technologies can
Lawyers have an ethical duty to safeguard clients’ confidential
information—a task that’s become more complicated as the cloud
becomes more ubiquitous By Jason Tashea
Cloudy Ethics

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT