A Close Examination of the 2016 Dallas and Baton Rouge Police Killers: Identifying Potential Risk Factors and Influences for Copycat Violence

AuthorAdam Lankford
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/10575677211061257
Published date01 March 2023
Date01 March 2023
A Close Examination of the
2016 Dallas and Baton Rouge
Police Killers: Identifying
Potential Risk Factors and
Inuences for Copycat Violence
Adam Lankford
Abstract
Two of the worst targeted attacks on American police ofcers in recent history occurred within
eleven days of each other. Although it seems clear their proximity was not merely attributable
to chance, the connection between these incidents, and the implications for understanding copycat
violence, have never been fully explored. This study analyzes the perpetrators of these attacks from
athresholds of violenceperspective, which suggests the rst actor in a sequence is more likely to
be disturbed and violence prone, while subsequent actors are typically less disturbed but more
socially inuenced. Results suggest the thresholds model has both merits and limits. The rst
attacker did have more psychological problems and violence in his past, and the second did seem
more inuenced by violent role models. However, there were also many similarities between
them, and both attacked due to a combination of internal and external factors. If this studysndings
are generalizable, higher risks of becoming a copycat offender may exist for individuals who have (1)
personal similarities with previous attackers, (2) a history of psychological problems, (3) a history of
interest in violent actors, and (4) recent escalation in their online behavior. Recommendations are
offered for future research, offender proling, and violence prevention.
Keywords
police killers, police shootings, mass shootings, copycat violence, offender proling
Introduction
On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson shot 12 police ofcers in Dallas, Texas, killing ve and
wounding seven others. On July 17, 2016, Gavin Long shot six police ofcers in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, killing three and wounding three others. These incidents constitute two of the worst
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Corresponding Author:
Adam Lankford, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, The University of Alabama, P.O. Box 870320, Tuscaloosa,
AL 35487, USA.
Email: Adam.Lankford@ua.edu
Original Article
International Criminal Justice Review
2023, Vol. 33(1) 5-22
© 2021 Georgia State University
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/10575677211061257
journals.sagepub.com/home/icj
targeted attacks on police ofcers in the United States, but the connection between them, and the
implications for understanding copycat violence, have never been fully explored.
It seems highly unlikely that the proximity of these attacks, which occurred within eleven days of
each other, is attributable to chance. Although there have been other cases in which multiple police
ofcers were killed in a single incident, violence of this type is extraordinarily rare. Data from the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2019) indicate that the odds of a U.S. law enforcement ofcer
being feloniously killed in a given year are approximately 1 in 16,000, and the vast majority of
those incidents do not involve attempts at mass murder.
1
It also seems unlikely that Johnsons and Longs attacks are fully explained by a shared precip-
itating cause: the police shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile earlier that month. Itis true
that both perpetrators considered those shootings unjust and both cited them as a reason for attacking
(Fernandez et al., 2016; State of Louisiana, 2017). However, if police shootings were extremely rare
in the United States, it might be easier to believe they caused this extremely rare outcome (two tar-
geted attacks in which multiple police ofcers were killed). Unfortunately, approximately 1,000
civilians are shot and killed by police in the United States each year (Washington Post, 2020),
and controversial cases that provoke public outrage have been all too common. This suggests
there is not a simple cause-and-effect relationship between police shootings of civilians and targeted
attacks on police that would fully explain Johnsons and Longs behavior.
A better explanation for the proximity of these attacks may be that the former inspired the latter. If
so, Johnson was the role model and Long was the copycat. This is consistent with research showing
that mass murder, mass shootings, and school shootings sometimes have a copycat element, whereby
susceptible individuals who have been inuenced by previous attackers eventually commit an attack
of their own (Follman, 2019; Helfgott, 2015; Langman, 2018; Lankford & Mads, 2018). It also ts
evidence from Longs (2016) social media posts that shows he was aware of Johnsons recent attack
and considered it morally justied.
To analyze the factors that led to Johnsons and Longs behaviorincluding the copycat element
this study will closely examine both perpetratorslives. Data from primary source documents, gov-
ernment reports, and other reliable sources will be used to make biographical comparisons, identify
conrmed inuences on each attacker, and examine other relevant information. Johnson and Long
will be analyzed from a thresholds of violenceperspective, which makes predictions about how
actors in a behavioral sequence differ from each other.
Thresholds of Violence
Research on copycat violence and contagion effects has primarily focused on a few key issues. For
instance, scholars have established that high prole perpetrators can inspire and inuence subsequent
perpetrators (Follman, 2019; Helfgott, 2015; Langman, 2018); that high prole incidents may
increase the likelihood of subsequent incidents (Kissner, 2016; Towers et al., 2015); and that outsized
media coverage of perpetrators makes these effects more likely (Lankford & Mads, 2018; Meindl &
Ivy, 2018; Sidhu, 2017).
However, very little attention has been paid to how much violent role models and copycats resem-
ble each other. Even if the behavior itself was copied, that does not clarify whether the role model and
copycat were similar in other ways, or whether both appear likely to have attacked if their sequence
had been reversed. In general, research on less extreme imitation (such as rudeness, smoking,
binge-eating, and jaywalking) suggests that people are more likely to copy actors of the same sex
and age (Meindl & Ivy, 2018). In addition, Langman (2018) cites several examples of mass shooters
who said they were personally similar to the attackers who inspired their crimes. But it is unknown
whether violent role models and copycats differ in other important ways, such as their propensity for
violence.
6International Criminal Justice Review 33(1)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex