Climate Adaptation and Disaster Mitigation: Land Use Strategies
Author | John R. Nolon |
Pages | 217-260 |
217
Chapter 6:
Climate Adaptation
and Disaster Mitigation:
Land Use Strategies
I. Climate Change, Adaptation, and Disasters
A. Inundation, Flooding, and Fiercer Storms
In Chapter 5, the gathering consensus regarding climate change and its
impacts on the environment a nd human settlements are discussed. at
chapter cited the increasing number of independent reports that recognize
the existence of climate change and associate it with human behavior. Of
importance to this chapter is the eect of climate change on sea levels, storm
surges, and extreme precipitation that aect the local environment and that
are driving loca l governments to respond to climate-induced disasters with
the signicant help of their states and federa l agencies.
e 2013 report of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, discu ssed
in Chapter 5, forecast s likely future changes including more intense hurri-
canes with related increases in wind, rain, and storm surges, and sea level rise
in coastal areas.1 In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court incorporated
by reference a report of the National Research Council that
identies a number of environmental changes that have already inicted si g-
nicant harms, includin g the global retreat of mountain glaciers, reduction in
snow-cover extent, the e arlier spring melting of ice on rivers and lakes, [and]
the accelerated rate of rise of sea levels du ring the 20th century relative to the
past few thousa nd years.2
Climate change causes the temperature of seawater to increase.3 is rise
in sea temperature in tropical areas increase s the ferocity of hurricanes, as
“[w]armer surface water d issipates more readily into vapor, mak ing it easier
for small ocean storms to escalate into larger, more powerful systems.”4
e combination of sea level rise and more intense storm events can lead
to a host of problems, including reduced freshwater supplies and severe dam-
218 Standing Ground
age to infrastruct ure of all types, including energy generation pla nts, and
coastal and ood pla in ecosystems.5 e threat of extreme precipitation is of
particular concern in the Northeast and Midwest regions where the inten-
sity and number of extreme rainfa ll events have increased substantia lly over
the past 30 years, with ood ing drastically aecting communities in the
Northeast.6 Climate change brings with it warmer air which contains more
water vapor and aects weather patterns, particularly in storm fronts in mid-
latitude regions.7 Simply put, “storm surges are exacerbated by rising sea
level.”8 is danger is of no small consequence, as “thirty-nine percent of the
population lives in coastal shoreline counties . . . [and] just under half of the
annual GDP of the United States is generated in coastal shoreline counties,
an annual contribution that was $6.6 trillion in 2011.”9
True to these predictions, Hurricane Sandy hit the East Coast in October
2012, becoming t he second costliest hurricane in the nation’s history, with
damage measured at $65.7 billion.10 With wave heights peaking at over 32
feet, Sandy dama ged or destroyed 650,000 homes, mostly in New York and
New Jersey.11 e extraordinary national attention Sandy attracted ma sks
The Nationa l Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administration’s GOE S-13 satellite captured th is
image of Hurri cane Sandy.
Climate Adaptation and Disaster Mitigation: Land Use Strategies 219
the reality that in 2012 alone, there were 11 climate related weather events
with d amage exceeding $1 billion in the United States.12 Gulf Coast state
residents a re still recovering from Katrina, the nation’s costliest hurricane
with damages exceeding t wice those of Sandy.13 A Presidential task force on
rebuilding post-Sandy makes it clear that climate change has “eliminated the
option of simply building back to outdated standards. . . .”14 e nation can-
not continue to aord the cost of rebuilding.
Development pressure on U.S. coastlines—building allowed by local land
use plans and regulations—is bound to make a bad situation worse in com-
ing decades. In 2010, more than 123 million America ns—39% of the U.S.
population—lived in coastal c ounties, according tothe National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOA A). NOAA expects the coastal pop-
ulation to increase by eight percent to 133 million by 2020.15 State and local
governments in these areas a re beginning to pay attention to these wa rnings
and to real signs that the eects of climate change are already occurring,
particularly at the ocean’s edge. As this chapter demonstrates, local govern-
ments are rethinking and revising their la nd use plans and zoning to reect
what t hey have learned by the destruct ion wrought by coastal storms and
unprecedented ooding.
As state and local governments struggle to frame responses to these wors-
ening problems, certain decisions made at t he federal level have rendered
their task more dicult. Most notably, despite all that we have learned in the
past few decades, Congress has failed to update the Coastal Zone Manage-
ment Act and Disaster Mitigation Act, while the Supreme Court has created
judicial barriers to eective state a nd loca l action. Lucas v. South Carolina
Coastal Council (1992), Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (2010), and Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Man-
agement District (2013) have had an unsettling eect on state and local agen-
cies as they attempt to address the devastating eects of increased sea level
rise and storms.16
B. Policy Options
ere are three main policies for dealing with sea level rise: retreat, accom-
modation, and protection.17 Retreat policies aim to minimize the hazards of
sea level rise by restricting, prohibiting, or removing development from vul-
nerable areas. Examples of retreat strategies include government land acquisi-
tion, rolling easements, and setback requirements. Accommodation strategies
attempt to minimize damage to structures from ooding and storm surges.
To continue reading
Request your trial