Civics literacy: no laughing matter.

AuthorPettis, Eugene K.
PositionPresident's page

We have all heard the jokes (and maybe even told a few ourselves) about the general public's lack of understanding of the judicial system and our overall democracy. Tragic statistics--such as more than one in five Americans believe the three branches of government are Republican, Democrat, and Independent; or less than half of Americans can correctly explain the concept of separation of powers --provide fodder for late-night comedians.

Our society has undergone dual transformations. On the one hand, we have become a more diverse and inclusive country in our neighborhoods, educational institutions, and workplaces. At the same time, our politics have become more homogeneous. This is partly due to redistricting efforts to create greater diversity. But it has created districts void of any contrary views or interests.

There was a day when the television evening news was a reliable source of objective reporting. Now, we have a menu of networks predictably biased toward one extreme or the other. Talk radio feeds on slanderous commentary directed to a specific sector rather than any pretense of objectivity. The Internet gives cover to deplorable comments that often reflect the worst of society.

Somewhere along the way political accountability for ineffectiveness was lost. The days when congressmen would propose legislation with bipartisan backing seems like a distant past. Why is that? Could it be that our citizens started retreating from engagement in current affairs and are ignoring government operations? And, if that is true, could it be because people are simply not educated on civics and how democracy should work?

I choose to believe that, as dim as the horizon may look, there is still hope for reclaiming our civility in this country, and the legal profession must lead the way!

My hope is not without basis. We don't need to look very far to see how aberrant behavior can be reversed when the community as a whole stands up and speaks out.

In 2012, Florida held a merit retention vote for many of our appellate judges, including three Supreme Court justices. In September, a political party executive council took an unprecedented position by voting to oppose the three justices.

What they did not anticipate was the uprising of citizens in all parties stating that such partisan politics is not acceptable in our court system. They recognized the foundation of the merit retention process was designed to take politics out of our courts.

It was former...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT