Citizen Willingness to Hold a Police Officer Criminally Responsible for the Use of Deadly Force: Examining the Correlates of Finding Guilt
| Published date | 01 October 2024 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/21533687231161770 |
| Author | Omeed S. Ilchi,Shamma J. Hickling,James Frank |
| Date | 01 October 2024 |
| Subject Matter | Articles |
Citizen Willingness to Hold a
Police Officer Criminally
Responsible for the Use of
Deadly Force: Examining the
Correlates of Finding Guilt
Omeed S. Ilchi
1
, Shamma J. Hickling
2
,
and James Frank
3
Abstract
Despite increased public attention on police killings of citizens and police accountabil-
ity in recent years, few studies have specifically examined the support for convicting
and incarcerating a specific police officer who was accused of wrongfully killing a cit-
izen. The current study examines the attitudes of undergraduate students at a large
Midwestern university about a case involving a white police officer who worked
for the university police department and recently shot and killed an unarmed Black
citizen during a traffic stop. Specifically, it examines support for convicting and incar-
cerating this officer, who was charged but ultimately went unpunished, and the factors
that are related to support for, opposition to, or neutrality towards holding the offi-
cer criminally responsible. The findings indicate that respondents who perceive police
officers as soldiers in a war on crime and hold symbolically racist attitudes were more
likely to oppose or be neutral about the officer being held responsible. White respon-
dents, while not more likely to oppose the conviction and incarceration of the officer,
were more likely to be neutral toward the outcome of the case, indicating that white
indifference might be a major barrier to holding police officers accountable for their
improper use of deadly force.
1
Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN, USA
2
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
3
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Corresponding Author:
Omeed S. Ilchi, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Purdue University Northwest, 2200 169th St,
Hammond, IN, USA.
Email: oilchi@pnw.edu
Article
Race and Justice
2024, Vol. 14(4) 543-563
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/21533687231161770
journals.sagepub.com/home/raj
Keywords
deadly force, citizen satisfaction, treatment by the police, police brutality, police
accountability
Introduction
Although public attention on police killings of citizens, and calls for enhanced police
accountability continue to grow, particularly after the killing of George Floyd and
Breonna Taylor, prosecutions of police officers remain rare. The conviction of
George Floyd’s murderer, Derek Chauvin, was an extremely rare outcome; from
2005 to 2019, 104 nonfederal law enforcement officers were arrested for murder or
manslaughter. Of those 104, only 35 have been convicted (Stinson & Wentzlof, 2019).
The current study examines public support for convicting a police officer in one of
those 104 cases. There have beenpublic surveys of citizen support for criminal trial out-
comes in cases involving officer shootings of citizens; however, empirical studies
examining the correlates of citizen willingness to hold officers criminally responsible
for killing a citizen are nonexistent. Our study attempts to fill this gap in the literature
using a sample taken from the population served by the officer involvedin the shooting
incident. The case involved a whitecampus police officer at a large Midwestern univer-
sity and a Black citizen they shot and killed during a traffic stop in 2015. The interaction
with the citizen after the stop and the shooting were both captured on the officer’s
body-worn camera. The case led to great public unrest and outrage, especially after
the camera footage and audio were released to the public. Ultimately, the officer was
charged with murder, though the trial ended in a mistrial. Charges were refiled by
the prosecutor and the second trial also ended in a mistrial. Both trials were telecast
on local television and received extensive coverage on all of the local media outlets.
Because this study uses a specific case, and surveysa sample drawn from the population
the officer served, the study is a unique addition to the literature.
Our primary focus is to determine whether respondent race, a belief in police-
military equivalency, symbolic racism, and a conservative crime ideology are
related to support for convicting and incarcerating this officer who ultimately went
unpunished. The following section reviews the literature on our key measures and
how they may be related to support for conviction.
Literature Review
Past Research on Support for Convicting Police Officers
Empirical research examining support for convicting police officers using deadly or
excessive force is limited. After Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George
Floyd in April of 2021, there were several public opinion surveys that examined
whether Americans supported the outcome of the trial. A CBS News survey of approx-
imately 2,500 Americans found that three-quarters of Americans supported the guilty
544 Race and Justice 14(4)
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting