Circular Economy and Global Governance

AuthorJames Pennington
PositionLead, Circular Economy and China Partnerships World Economic Forum
Pages31-31
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2021 | 31
Reprinted by permission from The Environmental Forum®, September/October 2021.
Copyright © 2021, Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, D.C. www.eli.org.
Sidebar
SI DE BAR
Circular Economy and Global Governance
ONLY 20 percent of global
electronic waste is recycled.
At the same time, the In-
ternational Energy Agency predicts
that to get to net-zero greenhouse
gas emissions by 2050 we’ll need six
times more mineral inputs by 2040
than we use today. One of the big-
gest stocks of these resources is in
our old electronics. Current prac-
tices often mean these minerals are
going to waste.
To effectively meet this demand
for minerals, we need to put in place
a system that can take back used
equipment for repair and recycling.
Doing so will require running re-
verse supply chains at scale.
For success at closing the loop
here, we need to bear in mind three
things. First, the reverse supply chain
system must be responsible — not
putting people or the planet at risk,
and absolutely no dumping on devel-
oping countries. Second, it must be
economically viable — so prohibitive
costs don’t slow adoption. Third, it
needs to be a global enterprise —
recovering many metals is a capital-
intensive, specialized business with
few facilities around the world.
The Basel Convention has been
vital in stopping egregious e-waste
dumping and providing much-
needed international governance
principles. However, reverse supply

research we have found that reverse
logistics for used electronic products
are between 31-190 percent more
costly than outbound logistics for
new products.
Over the last year the World
Economic Forum worked with the
World Business Council for Sustain-
able Development to bring together
other global organizations and the
biggest players in the electronics
industry in a Circular Electronics
Partnership. In this effort, we in-
terviewed many companies trying
to build a reverse supply chain to
help create a roadmap for the next
decade.
The insights revealed key areas
where intervention is needed. To
start, at a political level, govern-
ments must broaden their conversa-
tions and invite new voices. Discus-
sion should expand from waste man-
agement to explore the economy-
wide transformations possible with
the circular economy. Ministries of
trade, economy, and environment
need to be at the table. The conver-
sations also must include a full range
of external stakeholders.
Efforts should also be made to
connect convention conversations
with broader discussion around
the circular economy at the World
Trade Organization. As the role of
critical materials in decarbonization
becomes more apparent, it is time
to bring in the climate convention
and the Paris Agreement. These
broader dialogues could happen in
capitals or other forums if not on

The prior informed consent pro-
cedure is an important process in
the convention. But the system is

legitimate shipments of waste for
recycling. Given existing protocols,
the process can run into the tens
of thousands of dollars, with delays
spanning into months or years.


Currently, the PIC procedure re-
quires transit countries to consent
to e-waste shipments. Many don’t,
however, as they have very little
stake in the process. Transit coun-
tries could, instead, have the ability
to opt-in to block shipments. If a
country does not block a shipment
-
sidered that the country has given
its tacit consent.

follow a path of least resistance,
-
ties in developed countries should
be encouraged. Green corridors
could channel equipment from pre-
approved collectors or processors
-
ery facilities in developed countries
under a trusted trader system.
As the Basel Convention goes
into its 15th Convention of the Par-
ties this year, it is a perfect moment

and also reimagine its position as
the natural forum for global gover-
nance of the circular economy. With
overall material demand predicted
to double by 2050, governments
need a space to be able to come
together and put in place the archi-
tecture that will help us reach our
collective goals.
“To eectively meet this demand for
minerals, we need to put in place
a system that can take back used
equipment for repair or recycling.
Doing so will require running
reverse supply chains at scale”
James Pennington
Lead, Circular Economy and
China Partnerships
World Economic Forum

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT