Fifth Circuit upholds qualified disclaimer.

Author:Bonner, Paul
 
FREE EXCERPT

In an unpublished opinion, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a disclaimer by a legatee did not result in a lapsed bequest under Mississippi state law that would have resulted in taxable gifts of property passing to the legatee's heirs.

The circuit court thus reversed and remanded a decision by the federal district court for southern Mississippi that had ruled for the IRS on the issue.

Franklin M. Tatum Sr. (Tatum Sr.) died testate in 1987 in Mississippi. He devised 60% of his residual estate, which included valuable stock, to his son, Franklin M. Tatum Jr. (Tatum Jr.), and 20% shares to each of Tatum Sr.'s two grandsons by his only other son, who had predeceased him. The will also provided that if any of the legatees predeceased Tatum Sr., their shares would pass to their descendants per stirpes.

Later in 1987, Tatum Jr., who was also one of three executors of his father's will, disclaimed his interest in a letter to himself and the other executors. Accordingly, the probate court entered an order stating that Tatum Jr.'s disclaimed share would pass to his children as if Tatum Jr. had predeceased his father. In 1997, the stock was distributed to the heirs, including Tatum Jr.'s children.

Tatum Jr. died in 2003, and his wife, Doris Tatum, predeceased him in 2001. Both died testate. In 2008, the IRS sent notices of deficiency to the estates of both Tatum Jr. and Doris Tatum, alleging they failed to pay a combined $1.48 million in gift taxes due for 1997. The estates paid the taxes under protest and sued for a refund in district court. The IRS also asserted a negligence penalty, and if the court ruled for the IRS, the estates would have also owed more than $1.7 million in interest.

The district court said that Tatum Jr.'s disclaimer was not qualified under IRC [section] 2518(a) and therefore not exempt from gift tax because it failed the requirement of section 2518(b) that a qualified disclaimer must be made by an "irrevocable and unqualified refusal" of an interest in property and the...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP