Childhood Head Injury as an Acquired Neuropsychological Risk Factor for Adolescent Delinquency

AuthorJessica Mongilio
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221081140
Published date01 November 2022
Date01 November 2022
Subject MatterOriginal Research Articles
Childhood Head
Injury as an Acquired
Neuropsychological
Risk Factor for
Adolescent
Delinquency
Jessica Mongilio, M.A
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to parse out the effects of childhood head injury
(HI) as an acquired neuropsychological decit that impacts adolescent
delinquent behavior, while accounting for other early-life risk factors and
potential temporal ordering. Methods: Nationally representative prospec-
tive data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS; N =13,287) and
a series of logistic and binomial regressions are used to examine the rela-
tionship between early-life risk factors, HI, and adolescent delinquent
behavior. Methodological considerations from clinical HI research, such as
the use of an orthopedic injury comparison group, are incorporated.
Results: Findings are consistent with the conceptualization of HI as an
acquired neuropsychological decit, in that childhood HI increases the
Department of Sociology and Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald
Tower, University Park, PA 16802
Email: jmm1197@psu.edu
Corresponding Author:
Jessica Mongilio, M.A, Department of Sociology and Criminology, The Pennsylvania State
University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802.
Email: jmm1197@psu.edu
Original Research Article
Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency
2022, Vol. 59(6) 756790
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00224278221081140
journals.sagepub.com/home/jrc
risk of early- and adolescent-onset delinquency, sustained delinquent behav-
ior from childhood to early adolescence, and participation in a greater vari-
ety of delinquent behavior. Conclusions: Childhood HI is relatively common,
as over 27% of the sample reported at least one HI. The importance of HI
as an acquired neuropsychological decit and its relevance as a risk factor
for later criminal behavior is reiterated. Future research should examine
the importance of developmental period effects and mechanisms underlying
this relationship.
The psychological, emotional, and behavioral complications that arise
after experiencing a head injury (HI), such as a concussion, are numerous
and potentially detrimental across the lifespan (Crowe 2008; Eslinger,
Flaherty-Craig, and Benton 2004; Karver et al. 2012; Yeates and
Taylor 2005). Damage to the brain during childhood may disrupt
neural and psychosocial development, which developmental and bioso-
cial theories of crime suggest would inuence later criminal behavior
(Farrington 2006; Moftt 1993; Moftt and Caspi 2001). Research con-
sistently nds associations between HI and criminality (Durand et al.
2017; D. Fishbein et al. 2016; Huw Williams et al. 2010; Kaba et al.
2014; Luukkainen et al. 2012; Schoeld et al. 2015; Schwartz,
Connolly, and Brauer 2017; Schwartz, Connolly, and Valgardson
2018; Vaughn et al. 2019), but the vast majority of these studies
examine this relationship among either adults or incarcerated adoles-
cents. Little is known about the effect of childhood head injury on
onset of antisocial behaviors. While HI at any point in the lifespan has
the potential to change brain functioning and subsequent behaviors
(see Schwartz et al. 2019 for review), animal models suggest that HI
during childhood or adolescence may be even more detrimental to nor-
mative development (Guilhaume-Correa et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2018).
During this time, the brain goes though marked changes in both structure
and function, making it more susceptible to environmental inuences
(Karver et al. 2012).
Based on biosocial theories of crime, individuals who experience some
sort of early-life trauma, such as a HI, should be more likely to initiate delin-
quent behavior early and engage in more serious delinquent behaviors
(Moftt 1993; Moftt and Caspi 2001). As early onset of criminal or
Mongilio 757
delinquent behavior is predictive of frequent, serious, and persistent behav-
ior throughout the life-course, an in-depth exploration into HI is warranted
(LeBlanc and Loeber 1990, 1998). Part of this increased likelihood of
serious delinquency could be due to the acquired neuropsychological de-
cits that follow a head injury. Previous literature has established neuropsy-
chological decitsand specically HIas important risk factors for
impulsivity, aggression, and substance use (Beaver et al. 2010; Bonow
et al. 2019; D. Fishbein et al. 2016; Huw Williams et al. 2010; Kennedy,
Heron, and Munafò 2017; Perron and Howard 2008; Schwartz 2019;
Schwartz et al. 2017, 2018; Vaughn et al. 2014), all of which could lead
toward onset or acceleration of criminal behavior (LeBlanc and Loeber
1990, 1998).
Research on the behavioral correlates of HI tends to fall under the
purview of either clinical or criminological research. These two elds
offer relatively different perspectives and foci on the study of HI, some-
times to the detriment of further progress in HI research. Clinical litera-
ture tends to focus on moderate to severe HIs, which are much less
common than mild HIs (Frost et al. 2013), while criminological literature
tends to focus on offenders with a history of HI, which introduces selec-
tion issues (Schwartz 2019; Schwartz et al. 2017; see Connolly and
McCormick 2019 for exception). While clinical samples provide useful
insights on the potentially severe effects of HI, they are not representa-
tive of the general population that experiences a HI. It has been estimated
that up to 50% of young adults with mild HIswhich are far more
common than their more severe counterpartsdo not seek medical atten-
tion (Demakis and Rimland 2010), leaving much of the population with
HIs outside of the scope of clinical studies. On the other hand, crimino-
logical studies of offender populations shed light on the prevalence of
head injuries among incarcerated populations, which ranges from 46%
to 60% (Durand et al. 2017; Farrer and Hedges 2011), but do little to
address whether HI has any inuence on initiation and persistence of
criminal behavior or whether HIs occur as a consequence of involvement
in criminal and potentially dangerous behavior. Additionally, the use of
convicted samples in criminology research excludes those who have a
history of HI but have not come into contact with the criminal justice
system.
Furthermore, methodological complications exist in the study of HI,
many of which involve the operationalization of the injury variable itself.
Most clinical studies use diagnostic scales, which allow for relatively
precise measures of HI severity (Bonow et al. 2019; Light et al. 1998;
758 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 59(6)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT