Table of Cases
Jurisdiction | Washington |
TABLE OF CASES
This table lists cases and ethics opinions cited in this publication. Washington state cases, disciplinary notices, and ethics advisory opinions of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) are listed first. Cases from other states are listed next in alphabetical order by jurisdiction. These are followed by federal court cases. Ethics opinions of the American Bar Association are listed last. Each citation is followed by a colon and the page(s) and footnote(s) in the text where the citation appears.
WASHINGTON
A____________________________________________________________________________
Adkins v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 110 Wn.2d 128, 750 P.2d 1257, clarified on denial of reconsideration, 756 P.2d 142 (1988): 8–17; 8–17 nn.134, 135
AGM, In re Settlement/Guardianship, 154 Wn. App. 58, 223 P.3d 1276 (2010): 9–10 n.58; 9–13 n.80
Allard v. First Interstate Bank of Wash., N.A., 112 Wn.2d 145, 768 P.2d 998, amended by 773 P.2d 420 (1989): 9–13 n.75
Allotta, In re, 109 Wn.2d 787, 748 P.2d 628 (1988): 16–23 n.215; 16–51
Allper, In re, 94 Wn.2d 456, 617 P.2d 982 (1980): 12–25 n.147; 12–35 n.215; 16–53
Alpha Inv. Co. v. City of Tacoma, 13 Wn. App. 532, 536 P.2d 674 (1975): 3–16 n.87; 7–52 n.450; 7–97 n.824; 7–99 n.841; 7–102 n.869; 7–114 n.975
Americus v. McGinnis, 128 Wash. 28, 221 P. 987 (1924): 2–4 n.13
Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Osborn, 104 Wn. App. 686, 17 P.3d 1229 (2001): 10–19 n.113
Amoss v. Univ. of Wash., 40 Wn. App. 666, 700 P.2d 350 (1985): 6–72; 6–72 nn.423, 424
Anderson, In re, 138 Wn.2d 830, 981 P.2d 426 (1999): 12–5 n.16; 12–31 n.188
Anderson v. Manley, 181 Wash. 327, 43 P.2d 39 (1935): 8–37 n.302
Ang v. Martin, 154 Wn.2d 477, 114 P.3d 637 (2005): 15–2 n.8
Anschell, In re, 141 Wn.2d 593, 9 P.3d 193 (2000): 4–49 n.342; 7–41; 16–48
Anschell, In re, 149 Wn.2d 484, 69 P.3d 844 (2003): 5–12 n.79; 7–20 n.140; 7–53 n.453; 16–33 nn.313, 319; 16–48; 16–56
Aubin v. Barton, 123 Wn.App. 592, 98 P.3d 126 (2004): 15–11 n.98
Ausler v. Ramsey, 73 Wn.App. 231, 868 P.2d 877 (1994): 4–43; 4–43 nn.288, 289; 9–10 n.52; 9–15 n.90
B____________________________________________________________________________
Bahr v. PaineWebber, Inc., 81 Wn. App. 1022, 1996 WL 194909 (Apr. 22, 1996): 8–62 n.490
Ballou, In re, 48 Wn.2d 539, 295 P.2d 316 (1956): 12–27; 12–27 n.164; 12–28 nn.165, 166; 16–30; 16–30 n.290; 16–51
Bank of Anacortes v. Cook, 10 Wn. App. 391, 517 P.2d 633, review denied, 83 Wn.2d 1014 (1974): 15–12; 15–12 nn.105, 108
Bannister, In re, 86 Wn.2d 176, 543 P.2d 237 (1975): 16–4 n.22
Bar Examination Papers of John Thomas Costo, In re, No. 52128-0 (Wash. 1985): 2–27 n.181
Barrett v. Freise, 119 Wn.App. 823, 82 P.3d 1179 (2003): 15–7 n.52
Barr v. Day, 124 Wn.2d 318, 879 P.2d 912 (1994): 4–36 nn.226, 228; 9–15 nn.88, 89; 9–16 n.91; 9–22 n.145; 9–23 n.159; 15–13 n.111
Bartel v. Zucktriegel, 112 Wn.App. 55, 47 P.3d 581 (2002): 10–24 nn.154, 155; 12–3 nn.5, 8
Barton v. Tombari, 120 Wash. 331, 207 P. 239 (1922): 4–13; 4–14 nn.86, 91
Batali, In re, 85 Wn.2d 246, 533 P.2d 843 (1975): 16–53
Batali, In re, 98 Wn.2d 610, 657 P.2d 775 (1983): 16–64
Behrman, In re, 165 Wn.2d 414, 197 P.3d 1177 (2008): 5–8 n.50; 9–30 n.222; 16–48; 16–50; 16–63
Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. E.S., 171 Wn.2d 695, 257 P.3d 570 (2011): 13–6 n.25
Belli v. Shaw, 29 Wn.App. 875, 631 P.2d 980 (1981), aff'd, 98 Wn.2d 569, 657 P.2d 315 (1983): 4–36 n.228; 9–20 n.121; 11–8 n.29
Belous v. Bartlett, 147 Wn.App. 1003, No. 26517-0-III, 2008 WL 561463 (Oct. 14, 2008): 7–101 n.866
Belsher, In re, 102 Wn.2d 844, 689 P.2d 1078 (1984): 2–14; 2–14 n.84; 2–15; 2–15 nn.85-88; 2–16; 2–16 nn.95, 98; 10–23 n.142
Benjamin v. WSBA, 138 Wn.2d 506, 980 P.2d 742 (1999): 7–116 n.989
Benn, In re Personal Restraint of, 134 Wn.2d 868, 952 P.2d 116 (1998), aff'd in part and rev'd in part sub nom. State v. Benn, 161 Wn.2d 256, 165 P.3d 1232 (2007), cert. denied, 553 U.S. 1080 (2008): 7–28 n.217; 8–36 n.297
Bennion, Van Camp, Hagen & Ruhl v. Kassler Escrow, Inc., 96 Wn.2d 443, 635 P.2d 730 (1981): 1–3 n.7; 1–5; 1–5 n.18; 2–4 n.13; 2–4 n.20; 2–8; 2–8 n.36; 2–9; 2–9 n.46; 2–37 n.265; 2–42; 2–42 n.307; 2–57 n.411
Biggs v. Vail, 124 Wn.2d 193, 876 P.2d 448 (1994): 8–59 n.466
Bishop v. Jefferson Title Co., 107 Wn. App. 833, 844, 28 P.3d 802 (2001): 2–8 n.39; 2–9
Bixby, In re, 31 Wn.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948): 8–12 n.87; 12–21 n.120; 12–34 n.211; 16–53; 16–60
Blair v. Wash. State Univ., 108 Wn.2d 558, 740 P.2d 1379 (1987): 7–66 n.558
Blanchard, In re, 158 Wn.2d 317, 144 P.3d 286 (2006): 9–30 n.221; 12–29 n.171; 16–24 n.227; 16–53; 16–63
Blauvelt, In re, 115 Wn.2d 735, 801 P.2d 235 (1990): 12–32 n.200
Boelter, In re, 139 Wn.2d 81, 985 P.2d 328 (1999): 4–34 nn.209, 210; 5–6 n.31; 5–10; 5–10 nn.66, 67; 5–13; 5–13 nn.87, 89; 6–19 to 6–20; 6–20 n.107; 6–48 n.275; 6–49; 6–49 nn.278-285; 6–51 n.295; 6–67 n.381; 9–8 nn.37, 39; 9–14 n.19; 9–24 nn.161, 162; 10–2 n.2; 10–9 nn.45, 46; 16–33 n.315; 16–51; 16–55; 16–56
Bohn v. Cody, 119 Wn.2d 357, 832 P.2d 71 (1992): 4–5; 4–6; 4–7; 4–7 n.30; 4–8; 4–8 n.37; 6–69 n.395; 7–7 nn.10, 11, 12, 13; 7–8 n.21; 7–129 n.1082; 8–52; 8–52 n.414; 8–53; 8–53 n.415; 11–11; 11–11 n.44; 11–12; 11–12 n.51; 15–3; 15–3 nn.10, 11, 12-16, 23-25; 15–4; 15–4 nn.30-31; 15–5; 15–5 n.38
Bonet, In re, 144 Wn.2d 502, 29 P.3d 1242 (2001): 8–12 nn.89, 90; 8–35; 8–35 n.292; 12–14 n.64; 12–34 n.211; 16–11; 16–11 n.84; 16–14 n.122; 16–53; 16–60; 16–61
Bonet, In re, No. 19717, 2003 Wash. LEXIS 218 (Wash. Apr. 1, 2003): 8–12 n.91
Botimer, In re, 166 Wn.2d 759, 214 P.3d 133 (2009): 6–7 n.28; 6–10 n.41; 6–45 n.254; 6–53 n.305; 7–26 n.194; 7–37 n.316; 16–56; 16–57
Bowden, In re, 99 Wn.2d 684, 663 P.2d 1349 (1983): 16–64
Bowers v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co., 100 Wn.2d 581, 675 P.2d 193 (1983): 5–13; 5–13 n.82; 7–7 n.19
Bowman v. Doe, 104 Wn.2d 181, 704 P.2d 140 (1985)): 15–2 n.6
Bowman v. Two, 104 Wn.2d 181, 704 P.2d 140 (1985): 4–6 n.26; 4–35 n.213; 15–2 n.7; 15–3; 15–3 nn.23-25; 15–4; 15–4 nn.26, 27-28; 15–6 n.45; 15–9 n.77; 15–13 n.112
Brett, In re, 142 Wn.2d 868, 16 P.3d 601 (2001): 5–17 n.119
Brooks, In re, 57 Wn.2d 66, 355 P.2d 840 (1960): 2–14; 2–14 nn.77, 78; 2–18 n.119; 2–20; 12–26 n.152
Brothers, In re, 149 Wn.2d 575, 70 P.3d 940 (2003): 16–55
Brown, In re, 94 Wn.2d 750, 620 P.2d 101 (1980): 4–49 n.342; 12–29 n.171; 16–48
Brown, In re, 97 Wn.2d 273, 644 P.2d 669 (1982): 12–34 n.211; 16–60
Broyles v. Thurston Cnty., 147 Wn. App. 409, 195 P.3d 985 (2008): 6–72 n.416
Bruener, In re, 159 Wash. 504, 294 P. 254 (1930): 8–20 n.169; 16–52
Bruener, In re, 178 Wash. 165, 34 P.2d 437 (1934): 16–45; 16–45 n.395; 16–63
Bruen, In re, 102 Wash. 472, 172 P. 1152 (1918): 1–3 n.9; 1–4; 1–4 n.10; 1–6; 1–6 n.29; 1–7; 1–7 n.36; 16–2; 16–2 n.3; 16–3; 16–3 nn.7-9
Brumley v. Charles R. Denney Juvenile Ctr., 77 Wn.2d 702, 466 P.2d 481 (1970): 13–6 n.25
Brust v. Newton, 70 Wn.App. 286, 852 P.2d 1092 (1993), review denied, 123 Wn.2d 1010 (1994): 15–11 nn.86, 87, 90, 91, 93, 94, 96
Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc., 119 Wn.2d 210, 829 P.2d 1099 (1992): 8–59; 8–59 nn.464, 465; 8–60 nn.475, 477, 481, 483; 8–61 n.489
Buchanan, In re, 100 Wn.2d 396, 669 P.2d 1248 (1983): 12–33 n.206
Budlong v. Budlong, 31 Wash. 228, 71 Pac. 751 (1903): 4–14
Bullard v. Bailey, 91 Wn.App. 750, 959 P.2d 1122 (1998), review denied,137 Wn.2d 1014 (1999): 15–9 nn.75, 76; 15–11 nn.89, 93, 94-97
Burien Motors, Inc. v. Balch, 9 Wn. App. 573, 513 P.2d 582 (1973), review denied, 83 Wn.2d 1005 (1974): 2–37 n.264
Burnhaver v. Roche, 99 Wn.App. 1026, No. 42538-2-I, 2000 WL 141285, (Feb. 7, 2000), review denied, 142 Wn.2d 1005 (2000): 7–136 n.1140
Burns v. McClinton, 135 Wn.App. 285, 143 P.3d 630 (2006), review denied, 161 Wn.2d 1005 (2007): 15–14 n.125
Burns v. Norwesco Marine, Inc., 13 Wn. App. 414, 535 P.2d 860 (1975): 7–85 n.730
Burtch, In re, 112 Wn.2d 19, 770 P.2d 174 (1989): 4–49 n.342; 5–13 n.87; 8–6 nn.26, 32; 16–48
Burtch, In re, 162 Wn.2d 873, 175 P.3d 1070 (2008): 5–8 n.50; 9–3 n.10; 9–8 n.36; 16–48; 16–50; 16–51; 16–55
Busk v. Flanders, 2 Wn.App. 526, 468 P.2d 695 (1970): 15–16 nn.136, 137
Butler, In re, 110 Wn.2d 95, 750 P.2d 641 (1988): 16–64
C____________________________________________________________________________
Caffrey, In re, 71 Wn.2d 554, 429 P.2d 880 (1967): 8–12 n.87; 12–34 n.211; 16–53; 16–60
Campbell, In re, 74 Wn.2d 276, 444 P.2d 784 (1968): 16–64
Campbell, In re, 143 Wn.2d 504, 21 P.3d 1147 (2001): 16–26 n.252
Campbell v. Johnson, 141 Wn.App. 1016, No. 58766-8-I, 2007 WL 3133883 (Oct. 29, 2007): 7–32; 7–32 nn.262-266
Carabba v. Anacortes Sch. Dist. No. 103, 72 Wn.2d 939, 435 P.2d 936 (1967): 8–17 n.133
Carey v. Powell, 32 Wn.2d 761, 204 P.2d 193 (1949): 6–80 n.503
Carmick, In re, 146 Wn.2d 582, 48 P.3d 311 (2002): 7–41; 8–20; 8–20 n.170; 8–21 n.172; 8–44 n.360; 8–45; 8–45 nn.362, 366; 10–6; 10–6 n.23; 10–6 n.24; 10–10 n.67; 10–14 nn.79, 80; 10–20 nn.118, 119; 10–21; 12–14 n.75; 16–50; 16–51; 16–52
Carpenter, In re, 160 Wn.2d 16, 155 P.3d 937 (2007): 7–11 nn.52, 53; 7–89; 7–89 nn.760, 761; 7–91; 7–91 nn.783-787; 7–104 n.887; 16–57; 16–58
Carroll, In re, 54 Wn.2d 633, 343 P.2d 1023 (1959): 16–48; 16–53
Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 227, 867 P.2d 610 (1994): 8–14 n.112
Cascade Brigade v. Econ. Dev. Bd. for Tacoma-Pierce Cnty., 61 Wn.App. 615, 811 P.2d 697 (1991): 8–61 n.486
Case, In re, 59 Wn.2d 181, 367 P.2d 121 (1961): 12–34 n.211; 16–60
Cavers, In re, 165 Wash. 261, 4 P.2d 1106 (1931): 12–27 n.164
Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S., 129 Wn.App. 810, 120 P.3d 605 (2005), review denied, 157 Wn.2d 1004 (2006): 15–14 n.124
Cedell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash., 157 Wn. App. 267, 237 P.3d 309 (2010), review granted, 171 Wn.2d 1005 (2011): 6–77 n.471
Chantry, In re, 67 Wn.2d 190, 407 P.2d 160 (1965): 16–53
Chantry, In re, 84 Wn.2d 153, 524 P.2d 909 (1974): 16–64
Chi-Dooh Li, In re, 79 Wn.2d 561, 488 P.2d 259 (1971): 2–30; 2–30 nn.208, 209; 2–31
Christopher, In re, 153 Wn.2d 669, 105 P.3d 976 (2005): 10–8 n.42; 10–9 n.43; 10–18 n.103; 12–14 n.68; 16–51
City of Bellevue v. Acrey, 103 Wn.2d 203, 691 P.2d 957 (1984)...
To continue reading
Request your trial