Table of References

JurisdictionWashington

TABLE OF REFERENCES

This table lists secondary materials cited in the deskbook. Each citation is followed by a colon and the page(s) in the text on which the citation is found.

PERIODICALS ____________________________________________________________

James H. Allendoerfer, Comment, The Widows Election as an Estate Planning Device in Washington, 43 Wash. L. Rev. 455 (1967): 188, 189

Thomas R. Andrews, Creditors Rights Against Nonprobate Assets in Washington: Time for Reform, 65 Wash. L. Rev. 73 (1990): 319

Cynthia J. Artura, Comment, Superwill to the Rescue? How Washingtons Statute Falls Short of Being a Hero in the Field of Trust and Probate Law, 74 Wash. L. Rev. 799 (1999): 361-62

James A. Bamberger, Comment, Public Law 280: The Status of State Legal Jurisdiction Over Indians After Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation, 15 Gonz. L. Rev. 133 (1979): 439

Robert F. Brachtenbach, Community Property Agreements Many Questions, Few Answers, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 469 (1962): 349

John S. Calvert, Washington Case Law, 38 Wash. L. Rev. 410 (1963): 79

Compilation, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (1962): 328

Harry M. Cross, The Community Property Law in Washington (Revised 1985), 61 Wash. L. Rev. 13 (1986): 241, 328, 329, 334, 338

Harry M. Cross, Joint Tenancy for Washington?, 35 Wash. L. Rev. 292 (1960): 328

Mary L. Fellows, Rita J. Simon, & William Rau, Public Attitudes About Property Distribution at Death and Intestate Succession Laws in the United States, 1978 Am. B . Found. Res. J. 319 (1978): 13

Robert L. Fletcher, A Critical Note on Lapse, 8 Gonz. L . Rev. 26 (1972): 201

Robert L. Fletcher, Washingtons Non-lntervention ExecutorStarting Point for Probate Simplification, 41 Wash. L. Rev. 33 (1966): 122, 402

Bradley E.S. Fogel, The Completely Insane Law of Partial Insanity: The Impact of Monomania on Testamentary Capacity, 42 Real Prop. Prob. & Tr. J. 67 (2007): 78

Ivan W. Goodner, Notes and Comment, Does Washington Law Require Testator to Sign His Will in Presence of Attesting Witness?, 6 Wash. L. Rev. 84 (1931): 37

J. Gordon Gose & Joseph W. Hawley, Probate Legislation Enacted by the 1955 Session of the Washington Legislature, 31 Wash. L. Rev. 22 (1956): 414

Tom Graafstra, Recent Developments-Probate Law & Procedure, 51 Wash. L. Rev. 451 (1976): 360

Yale B. Griffith, Joint Tenancy and Community Property, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 30 (1962): 333

James A. Henderson, Jr., Mistake and Fraud in WillsPart I: A Comparative Analysis of Existing Law, 47 B.U. L. Rev. 303 (1967): 155

Wythe W. Holt, Jr., Revocation by Subsequent Instrument in Alabama: The Strange Rule of Bruce v. Sierra, 20 Ala. L. Rev. 66 (1967): 123-24

Inter Vivos TrustsThe Washington Testamentary Anti-Lapse Statute Applied to an Inter Vivos Trust, Recent Developments, 47 Wash. L. Rev. 743 (1972): 201

Mark L. Kaufmann, Note, Should the Dead Hand Tighten Its Grasp: An Analysis of the Superwill, 1988 u. Ill. L. Rev. 1019 (1988): 360

Richard E. Keefe, Washington Case Law-1962, 38 Wash. L. Rev. 255 (1963): 357

[Page 487]

Mason Ladd, The Dead Man Statute: Some Further Observations and a Legislative Proposal, 26 Iowa L. Rev. 207 (1941): 392

W. Barton Leach & James K. Logan, Perpetuities: A Standard Saving Clause to Avoid Violations of the Rule, 74 Harv. L. Rev. 1141 (1961): 280

Virginia B. Lyness, Comment, Effect of Joint Accounts with Right of Survivorship in Washington, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 88 (1962): 311, 329

Kristina L. McCulley, The American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004: The Death of Fractionation or Individual Native American Property Interests and Tribal Customs?, 30 Am. Ind. L. Rev. 401 (2006): 440

William M. McGovern, Jr., The Payable on Death Account and Other Will Substitutes, 67 Nw. U. L. Rev. 7 (1972): 319

James B. Mitchell, Recent Case, 27 Wash. L. Rev. 163 (1952): 413

Joseph W. Morris, The Wills Branch of the Worthier Title Doctrine, 54 Mich. L. Rev. 451 (1956): 239

Note, Recent Developments, Creation of Joint Tenancy, 53 Wash. L. Rev. 557 (1978): 330

Note, Rights to Stock Accretions Which Occur Prior to Testators Death, 36 Alb. L. Rev. 182 (1971): 177, 178

William Oltman, The Implied Termination of Community Property Agreements Upon Permanent Separation, 14 U. Puget Sound L. Rev. 53 (1990): 342

George E. Palmer, Dependent Relative Revocation and Its Relation to Relief for Mistake, 69 Mich. L. Rev. 989 (1971): 155, 157, 158

Nancy C. Phelps, Comment, Antenuptial and Postnuptial Contracts in Washington, 54 Wash. L. Rev. 135 (1978): 245, 248

John R. Price, The Transmission of Wealth at Death in a Community Property Jurisdiction, 50 Wash. L. Rev. 277 (1975): 359

Jan E. Rein, A More Rational System for the Protection of Family Members Against Disinheritance: A Critique of Washingtons Pretermitted Child Statute and Other Matters, 15 Gonz. L. Rev. 11 (1979): 143, 144, 152

Mark Reutlinger, Divorced But Not Deceased: The Anomaly of the Surviving Former Spouse, 40 Wash. St. Bar News 27 (March 1986): 141

Mark Reutlinger, Legislative Lapses: Some Suggestions for Probate Code Reform in Washington, 10 U. Puget Sound L. Rev.. 173 (1987): 56, 120, 131, 133, 143, 145, 149, 150, 194, 200, 415

Mark Reutlinger, The Predeceased Surviving Spouse: The Uncertain Effects of Divorce on Contingent Testamentary Gifts, 1988 Fin. & Est. Plan. ¶26,151: 141

Mark Reutlinger, State Action, Due Process, and the New Nonclaim Statutes: Can No Notice be Good Notice if Some Notice is Not?, 24 Real Prop., Prob. & Tr. J. 433 (1990): 405

Mark Reutlinger, When Words Fail Me: Diagramming the Rule Against Perpetuities, 59 Mo. L. Rev. 157 (1994): 271

Recent Case, 18 Wash. L. Rev. 45 (1943): 151

Recent Case, 26 Wash. L. Rev. 64 (1951): 148, 149

Richard Rosenthal, Recent Decisions, 55 Mich. L. Rev. 465 (1956): 38

Ivan C. Rutledge, Joint Tenancy in Washington Bank Accounts, 26 Wash. L. Rev. 116 (1951): 311

Robert A. Stewart & John R. Steincipher, Probate Reform in Washington, 39 Wash. L. Rev. 873 (1965): 137

[Page 488]

Patrick A. Trudell, Comment, The Deadmans Statute in Washington, 15 Gonz. L. Rev. 501 (1980): 391, 392

H.E. Tully, Joint Tenancy in Real Property-The Title Insurers Viewpoint, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 7 (1962): 329, 331

Antonina Vaznelis, Probating Indian Estates: Conquerors Court Versus Decedent Intent, 10 Am. Ind. L. Rev. 287 (1982): 439

Lawrence W. Waggoner, Critique, A Proposed Alternative to the Uniform Probate Codes System for Intestate Distribution Among Descendants, 66 Nw. u. L. Rev. 626 (1971): 11

Joseph Warren, Dependent Relative Revocation, 33 Harv. L. Rev. 337 (1920): 155, 157, 289

Washington Case Law1955, 31 Wash. L. Rev. 162 (1956): 283

Washington Case Law1956, 32 Wash. L. Rev. 136 (1957): 283

Washington Legislation1959, 34 Wash. L. Rev. 330 (1959): 279

Richard V. Wellman, The Uniform Probate Code: Blueprint for Reform in the 70s, 2 Conn. L. Rev. 453 (1970): 359

William H. Wicker, Spendthrift Trusts, 10 Gonz. L. Rev. 1 (1974): 264

Judge Lloyd L. Wiehl, Our Burden of Burdens, 41 Wash. L. Rev. 109 (1966): 292

David L. Williams, Washington Case Law1960, 36 Wash. L. Rev. 211 (1963): 303

Ethel J. Williams, Comment, Too Little Land, Too Many HeirsThe Indian Heirship Land Problem, 46 Wash. L. Rev. 709 (1971): 438, 442

Williard J. Wright, Comment, Contracts to Devise Real Property, 14 Wash. L. Rev. 30 (1939): 298, 301

Willard J. Wright et al., Practice Under the New Probate Code 176-77 (Wash. State Bar Assoc. Cont. Legal Ed. Comm. 1974): 122

James N. Zartman, An Illinois Critique of the Uniform Probate Code, 1970 U. Ill. L.F. 413: 359

TEXTS_____________________________________________________________________

2 American Law of Property §§6.1-6.4 (A. James Casner ed. 1952 & Supp. 1977): 328

2 American Law of Property §6.2 (A. James Casner ed. 1952 & Supp. 1977): 331

2 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §9.1 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 308

2 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §9.3.9 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 271, 283

2 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §9.6 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 260, 263, 264, 284

3 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §15.1 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 265

3 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §15.2 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 264, 265, 267

3 Mark L. Ascher, Austin W. Scott, & William F. Fratcher, Scott and Ascher on Trusts §15.3 (5th ed. 2006 & Supp. 2016): 267, 268

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §6 (2d ed. 1953): 1

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §8 (2d ed. 1953): 17

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §20 (2d ed. 1953): 21

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §21 (2d ed. 1953): 18

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §22 (2d ed. 1953): 20

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §36 (2d ed. 1953): 150, 153

[Page 489]

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §38 (2d ed. 1953): 144

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §39 (2d ed. 1953): 309

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §40 (2d ed. 1953): 311, 319

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §43 (2d ed. 1953): 322, 324

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §45 (2d ed. 1953): 351, 352, 353

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §48 (2d ed. 1953): 291, 300, 301

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §51 (2d ed. 1953): 58

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §52 (2d ed. 1953): 81

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §57 (2d ed. 1953): 92

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §58 (2d ed. 1953): 117, 118

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §59 (2d ed. 1953): 92

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §60 (2d ed. 1953): 231. 235

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills §61 (2d ed. 1953): 120

Thomas E. Atkinson, Handbook of the Law...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex