Chapter 14 Outline

JurisdictionUnited States

Chapter 14

Analytical Framework for Patent Infringement

§14.01 Statutory Basis: 35 U.S.C. §271

§14.02 Direct Versus Indirect Infringement

[A] Introduction
[B] Direct Infringement Under §271(a)
[1] Making
[2] Using
[a] Generally
[b] Using a Claimed System
[c] Using a Claimed Method
[3] Selling
[4] Offering to Sell
[5] Importing

§14.03 Territoriality Aspects of §271(a)

[A] Introduction
[B] Use of Processes or Methods Within the United States
[C] "Beneficial Use" Doctrine
[D] "Sells" Within the United States
[E] "Offer[] to Sell" Within the United States

§14.04 Temporal Aspects of §271

[A] Pre-Issuance Acts
[B] Post-Issuance Acts

§14.05 Divided Direct Infringement by Multiple Entities

[A] Introduction
[B] Akamai II (Fed. Cir. 2012) ( en banc)
[C] Akamai III (U.S. 2014)
[D] Akamai V (Fed. Cir. 2015) ( en banc)
[1] "Directs or Controls" Liability
[a] Service Provider-Customer Relationship
[b] Physician-Patient Relationship
[c] "Partnership-Like" Relationship
[2] Joint Enterprise Liability
[3] Subsequent History
[E] Pleading Joint (or "Divided") Direct Infringement
[1] Illustrative Cases Not Alleging Sufficient Facts for a "Plausible" Claim
[2] Illustrative Cases That Do Allege Sufficient Facts for a "Plausible" Claim

§14.06 Indirect Infringement Under §271(b)–(c): Overview

[A] Practicing Less Than Complete Claimed Invention
[B] Intent Required
[C] Historical Background
[D] Direct Infringement as Predicate to Indirect Liability

§14.07 Two-Step Analysis for Patent Infringement

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT