Changes in the Satisfaction of Cohabitors Relative to Spouses Over Time

AuthorElena Pirani,Daniele Vignoli
Date01 June 2016
Published date01 June 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12287
E P  D V University of Florence
Changes in the Satisfaction of Cohabitors Relative
to Spouses Over Time
Family scholars have noted a gap in the sub-
jective well-being of cohabitors relative to
spouses and have hypothesized that the size of
this “cohabitation gap” varies depending on
how far cohabitation has diffused in a society.
For the rst time we test this hypothesis across
time in a single country, Italy, by analyzing
20 cross-sectional, nationally representative
surveys collected from 1993 to 2013 by the
Italian Institute of Statistics (N=279,190 part-
nered young adults). We nd that differences in
the assessments of family satisfaction between
cohabitors and spouses have eroded over the
years and that there has been no detectable
cohabitation gap since 2011. In addition, we
illustrate that the weakening of the cohabitation
gap is attributable to the diffusion of cohabiting
unions in Italian society.
Over the past decades, the number of couples
who are cohabiting, or living together in an
intimate union without marriage, has been
increasing in many Western societies (Bumpass
& Lu, 2000; Kiernan, 2002; Perelli-Harris et al.,
2012). A central path of inquiry is whether
there is a gap in the subjective well-being of
cohabitors relative to married people, or a
so-called cohabitation gap (Soons & Kalmijn,
University of Florence, VialeMorgagni, 59, 50134
Florence, Italy (pirani@disia.uni.it;
vignoli@disia.uni.it).
KeyWords: cohabitation, cross-timecomparisons, marriage,
satisfaction.
2009). Some studies have reported that cohab-
itors have lower levels of life satisfaction and
happiness and higher levels of depression than
married people (Kim & McKenry, 2002; Kur-
dek, 1991; Soons & Kalmijn, 2009), and others
have found that cohabitors are less committed
to and satised with their partnerships than
their married counterparts are (e.g., Brown &
Booth, 1996; Nock, 1995; Stanley, Whitton, &
Markman, 2004; Stutzer & Frey, 2006).
There is evidence of spatial variation in the
size of this cohabitation gap, however. Previous
authors have shown that the gap is smaller in
countries where cohabitation is more popular
than in countries where this type of union is
still a marginal phenomenon (Soons & Kalmijn,
2009; Wiik, Keizer, & Lappegård, 2012). They
explained these cross-national differences in
light of the level of diffusion of cohabitation
in a society: In countries where the practice of
cohabitation is more common and accepted,
differences in the satisfaction levels between
cohabitors and spouses tend to be smaller. In a
similar vein, the diffusion of cohabitation has
been suggested to reduce differences in union
dissolution risks across union types (Liefbroer
& Dourleijn, 2006). So far, however, the evi-
dence that this is the case has been only indirect,
because inferences were made by comparing
countries with different levels of diffusion of
cohabitation.
This study provides direct evidence to eval-
uate whether the size of the cohabitation gap
declines as cohabitation diffuses in a single
country, Italy, a place where cohabitation does
not yet represent an integral part of family
598 Journal of Marriage and Family 78 (June 2016): 598–609
DOI:10.1111/jomf.12287

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT