Chair's corner.

AuthorWilliamson, Jimmy L.

As I travel around the country, I am encouraged by the renewed commitment states are making to tackle a critical problem facing CPAs. It's a problem affecting CPAs of all sized firms, from sole practitioners to the Big 4. I am speaking of mobility--or the ability of a licensee to get a practice privilege in a jurisdiction outside of their home state--without the need to obtain another license.

As geographic boundaries become increasingly irrelevant to business operations, clients are in desperate need of CPAs who can conduct business across state lines, unfettered by counterproductive regulations that do not serve the public interest.

For nearly 10 years, the AICPA has worked with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy to develop and implement a uniform approach to cross-boarder mobility through a provision in the AICPA/NASBA Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) called substantial equivalency. Efforts to date have resulted in a disjointed and non-uniform approach to mobility because states have not implemented substantial equivalency as it was intended.

The pure concept of substantial equivalency is simple and similar to a driver's license: A CPA must have a license from a state that has licensing criteria equivalent to the provisions in the UAA, and when that occurs, the CPA can practice in other substantial equivalent states without the need to obtain a license in that state.

As I talk to CPAs across the country and hear the needs of the clients they serve, it becomes strikingly apparent that a uniform approach to facilitate mobility, while preserving the rights of the state boards of accountancy to discipline those who practice in their state, has reached a critical juncture.

Solving this crisis will take a collaborative effort. Importantly, on board with the AICPA are NASBA, state CPA societies and state boards of accountancy across the country.

Within the AICPA, the Special Committee on Mobility was charged at its inception in Apr. 2006 to develop recommendations for achieving a uniform mobility system across the nation for CPAs and firms.

The special committee was additionally tasked with providing significant resources to the states that seek to enact and/or revise mobility provisions (substantial equivalency) within their state laws or regulations.

After conducting comprehensive research and heating the perspectives from other stakeholders, the committee agreed that any model mobility system would have to:

* Respect and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT