Chain Reaction

AuthorAngela Morris
Pages32-33
The cryptoc urrency and blockchain
technology industr y is already crowded
with fi rms eag er to nab high-tech startups
as clients or help legacy client s navigate a
brave new world.
But some BigLaw fi rms have gone furt her. Over the
past 2∏ years, severa l of the largest fi rms in the world
have joined legal working groups a imed at bringing crypto
and blockchain attor neys together to share informat ion,
learn from one another, and help craf t best practices.
“We can achieve more together by sh aring and by grap-
pling with these quest ions together as a group, hearing eac h
person out, than we ca n wrestling with thi ngs alone,” says
Joshua Ashley Klay man, formerly with Morrison & Foerster
in New York City, who in late June launched her own fi rm
and a blockchain consult ancy business, Infl ection Point
Blockchain Advisors.
Blockchain technolog y stores records on multiple “ nodes”
in a network of computers that commu nicate and capture
changes in sync . Blockchain data is more secure beca use
rather than tamper ing with one record on one computer, a
hacker would have to change th at record on every single
node—in the process burni ng computer power to solve a
math equation posed by the blockc hain’s algorithm—which
would be nearly impossible.
PART NER PE RKS
Klayman ch airs the Wall Street Blockchain A lliance
Legal Industr y Working Group, whic h formed in 2016 and
was one of the earliest on the sc ene. It’s like a community,
says Klayma n, who leads biweekly, in-person meetings of
lawyers from BigLaw fi r ms such as Debevoise & Plimpton,
McDermott Will & Emer y and Polsinelli. “Some have been
able to develop relationships that have led to t eaming on
deals, led to us w riting things together—whether art icles or
thought pieces—and led to bett er advice,” she says.
Discussions cover blockcha in tech in general and don’t
favor one blockchain over another. Referral s for paid legal
representation are common a mong the lawyers in the group,
and membership is open and free , Klayman says.
Also popping up in 2016 was the Digit al Currency &
Ledger Defense Coa lition, whose members include Am Law
rms like K&L G ates and Sidley Austin. It provides pro
bono representation to cr ypto and blockchain defendants
and fi les amicus brie fs in cases that could set precedent .
“We’ve raised issues that other wise wouldn’t be raised
with court s in some of the most important decisions in the
country,” says Brian Klein , the coalition’s founder and board
chairman a nd a partner at Baker Marquart i n Los Angeles.
For example, the coalition fi led an a micus brief in Flori da
v. Espinoza in January, which involves a defendant who sold
bitcoins in 2014 to undercover agents who indic ated they
planned to buy stolen credit- card numbers with the bitcoins .
But the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida fou nd in 2016 that
bitcoins didn’t count as money under Florid a law and dis-
missed defendant Michell E spinoza’s charges of money
laundering and illega l money transmission. The state has
appealed in Florida’s 3rd Distric t Court of Appeal, and the
Digital Cur rency & Ledger Defense Coalition a rgues the
appellate court should a  r m the trial court’s ruling.
32 || ABA JOURNAL AUGUST 2018
Business of Law
||
SPECIAL EDITION
Technology
PHOTO COURTESY OF CARDOZO SCHOOL OF LAW; FOXAON1987/SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
is a costly endeavor and can e asily add up to hundreds
of thousands of dollars. Thus, in-house c ounsels should
demand that outside law fi rms have a dequate cyber liability
insurance to help cover bre ach notifi cation costs, as well
as qualifi ed legal a nd forensic vendors who specialize in
responding to breach i ncidents negotiated into the policy.
Furthermore, new A BA ethics opinions emphasize that
to be competent, law yers must understand technology and
maintain the se curity of clients’ electronic confi dentia l
information . These developments are forc ing in-house coun-
sels and their outside law fi rms t o be cognizant of the very
real and signifi ca nt risks they face in the 21st centu ry and to
acquire the tech nology su cient to keep abreast of their
clients’ cybersec urity needs. Q
Read more about how to avoid fal ling victim to soc ial
engineering c yberattacks at A BAJournal.com.
Karen Painter Randall is a partner and certi ed civil trial
attorney in the Roseland, New Jersey, of ce of Connell Foley,
where she’s chair of the  rm’s cybersecurity and data privacy
practice group. Steven Kroll is a partner at the  rm and works
with businesses regarding the ever-evolving issues related to
cybersecurity and data protection. He provides awareness
training for employees on issues related to cybersecurity.
Chain Reaction
BigLaw fi rms are working together
with the goal of infl uencing how
blockchain technolog y and smart
contracts will operate in the future
By Angela Morris
“The technology has
the potential to make
a dent and improve
people’s lives, and the
only way thats going
to happen is if we have
these conversations.
– Aaron Wright

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT