Carton Set Optimization in E‐commerce Warehouses: A Case Study

Date01 September 2020
Published date01 September 2020
AuthorEhsan Ardjmand,Manjeet Singh
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12255
Carton Set Optimization in E-commerce Warehouses: A Case
Study
Manjeet Singh
1
, and Ehsan Ardjmand
2
1
DHL Supply Chain
2
Ohio University
In this study, a three-stage methodology for carton set optimization in e-commerce warehouses is proposed and evaluated on three DHL Sup-
ply Chain warehouses. The methodology includes order cubing, carton grouping, and optimal carton set selection. A modied largest area
ts rst algorithm for order cubing is proposed. For optimal carton set selection, a genetic algorithm with a novel crossover strategy is intro-
duced. The results show that the proposed carton set optimization approach can improve the shipping cost and carton utilization by 7% and
7.8%, and considerably improve the carbon footprint of the operations, even when the number of carton types is not changed.
Keywords: carton optimization; E-commerce; largest area ts rst; order cubing; optimal carton set selection
INTRODUCTION
With the increased technological capabilities and Internet pene-
tration rates, e-commerce businesses have experienced substantial
sales growth in recent years. On a global scale and led by Asian
markets, e-commerce sales has soared from $1.336 trillion in
2014 to $3.535 trillion in 2019, and is expected to grow into
$6.542 trillion by 2023 (Statista, 2020). Only in 2019, seasonally
adjusted retail e-commerce sales in the United States have
increased by 4.2 percent from the rst quarter to the second
quarter (Department of Commerce, 2019).
While offering enormous benets, e-commerce growth has
also initiated various managerial challenges at strategic, tactical,
and operational levels of retailerssupply chains. To deal with a
signicant annual expansion, supply chain managers need to
improve their strategic and tactical decisions regarding supply
chain issues such as topological design, outsourcing, supplier
selection, transportation, and warehousing (Ganeshan et al.,
1999). At an operational level, e-commerce order proles are
highly complex and challenging to manage. E-commerce orders
are usually small in size, have irregular arrival patterns, are sea-
sonally distributed, and are expected to be fullled with a high
service level (Zhu et al., 2014; Leung et al., 2018; Ardjmand
et al., 2018b).
Realizing the importance of operational decisions in the e-
commerce supply chain and their nancial implications, research-
ers have developed a large body of literature on this subject,
spanning from warehouse operations (Valle et al., 2017; Scholz
et al., 2017; Ardjmand et al., 2018b, 2019) to transportation
(Toth and Vigo, 2002) and shelf space optimization (Eroglu
et al., 2018). Despite the existence of an extensive operations lit-
erature, there seems to be a gap between the theory and practice
of supply chain operational issues in terms of the problems
investigated and the methodologies utilized. One such problem is
the carton set optimization, which is concerned with specifying a
set of cartons along with their dimensions in order to minimize
the total shipping cost of orders given a particular demand pat-
tern. The carton set optimization problem is highly relevant and
directly impacts the operational costs of warehouses and the
environmental footprint of e-commerce supply chains by reduc-
ing the number of generated cartons and hence reducing the last
mile delivery trips.
With signicant growth in e-commerce, one consequence of
the increased number of parcel deliveries has been the change in
the pricing model. The model has drifted away from a per-carton
or total weight of the carton shipped pricing to one that highly
depends on the utilization of cartons. Starting in 2007, along
with a new pricing model, the newly introduced "Dimensional
Weight" concept began to play a signicant role in pricing parcel
shipments. Dimensional weight (also known as "Volumetric
Weight") depends on the length, width, and height of a parcel
and is calculated as
DimWeightðlbÞ¼lengthðinÞweightðinÞheightðinÞ
αin3
lb
 (1)
where αwhich depends on the contract between the given com-
pany and their shipper(s). When introduced, dimensional weight
was merely used to penalize those shipping packages over three
cubic feet. However, in May 2014, parcel shippers announced
expanding the application of dimensional weight ratings to all
shipments starting in 2015. After 2015, the shipping cost on all
parcels is determined by the greater of its actual weight and
dimensional weight. Thus, shipping cost for parcel kis calculated
as
CostðkÞ¼MaxfPriceðDimWeightðkÞÞ,PriceðWeightðkÞÞg (2)
where Price is a pricing function. When considering this new
pricing model, parcels with lower densities and lower ll rate
would be charged, based on dimensional weight, more than the
same size parcels with higher densities and ll rate. In the
absence of dimensional weight considerations, warehouses may
not nd it necessary to focus on optimizing the carton size or
minimizing void space (empty space in a carton) for order
Corresponding author:
Ehsan Ardjmand, Department of Analytics and Information Systems,
College of Business, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA; email:
ardjmand@ohio.edu
Journal of Business Logistics, 2020, 41(3): 222235 doi: 10.1111/jbl.12255
© 2020 Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT