Callous-Unemotional Traits are Associated With Child-to-Parent Aggression

AuthorHue San Kuay,Lynda G. Boothroyd,Graham J. Towl,Paul A. Tiffin,Luna C. Muñoz
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211049190
Published date01 November 2022
Date01 November 2022
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211049190
International Journal of
Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
2022, Vol. 66(15) 1603 –1626
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X211049190
journals.sagepub.com/home/ijo
Article
Callous-Unemotional Traits
are Associated With Child-to-
Parent Aggression
Hue San Kuay1,2 , Lynda G. Boothroyd2,
Graham J. Towl2, Paul A. Tiffin3,4,
and Luna C. Muñoz5
Abstract
This study examined the relations between callous-unemotional traits and
perpetration of aggression toward parents in two separate studies, while also
considering motivation for aggression and parenting styles experienced among young
people. Study 1 involved 60 parents of children aged between 11 and 17 years old.
The online study found high callous-unemotional traits, as reported by parents, to be
associated with aggression toward both parents. Both types of motivation (proactive
and reactive, as reported by parents) were associated with aggression toward
parents. Study 2 involved 42 youths from an alternative education sample (between
11 and 16 years old). Youths with higher self-reported callous-unemotional traits
reported more aggression toward both parents. Both studies, which had different
reporters and different samples, showed youths with higher callous-unemotional
traits were more aggressive toward their parents. In discussing the results, we note
the importance of including callous-unemotional traits in future research on parent-
directed aggression and in studies on domestic violence more broadly.
Keywords
child-to-parent aggression, callous-unemotional traits, peer aggression, parenting
styles, motivation of aggression
1Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
2Durham University, Durham, UK
3University of York, Heslington, York, UK
4Forensic Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services for Yorkshire and Humber, CAMHS, York, UK
5Royal Society of Arts, London, UK
Corresponding Author:
Hue San Kuay, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains
Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia.
Emails: huesankuay@usm.my; kuayhuesan@gmail.com
1049190IJOXXX10.1177/0306624X211049190International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyKuay et al.
research-article2021
1604 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 66(15)
Family abuse by young people is not a new phenomenon (Purcell et al., 2014), but to
date, available studies in this area are somewhat limited compared to other types of
violence and aggression that occurs within home settings. At present, a legal definition
of child-to-parent aggression (CPA), violence, or abuse is still lacking. Cottrell (2001),
however, defined this incidence as “any act of a child that is intended to cause physi-
cal, psychological or financial damage in order to gain control over a parent.” Due to
the complexity of parent-directed aggression cases, no one factor is likely to explain
such behavior. Among the factors identified are substance abuse, parenting styles,
mental health issues, peer influence, poverty, and gender (i.e., male viewing them-
selves as more dominant than female) as contributors to the commission of parent
abuse (Cottrell & Monk, 2004).
Callous-unemotional (CU) traits may be one factor that relates to aggression toward
parents. CU traits are described as a group of traits of callousness, lacking remorse
toward others, shallow affect and/or insensitivity toward the feelings of others
(Kimonis et al., 2015). Such traits appear to further explain the early-onset of conduct
disorder, which tend to still be present in their antisocial behavior in adulthood (Burke
et al., 2007; Lynam et al., 2007; Pardini & Frick, 2013). CU traits are not only evident
in children and adolescents (Frick & Marsee, 2006), but they are relatively stable
across these developmental stages (i.e., based on studies that examined young people
over 1, 2, and 5 year periods among children aged 7 to 17 years; Burke et al., 2007;
Frick et al., 2003; Lynam et al., 2009). Not only are CU traits and aggression in chil-
dren and adolescents are correlated (Waller et al., 2017), CU traits also characterize a
group of young people who are more aggressive and have severe antisocial behavior
(Edens et al., 2008; Frick & Hare, 2001; Frick & White, 2008; Ray & Frick, 2020).
Recent studies also found that with the presence of elevated levels of CU traits among
young people with problem behavior formed a “sub-group” of those who are severely
violent, thus difficult to treat (Blair et al., 2014; McMahon et al., 2010; Ray & Frick,
2020). During middle childhood, individuals’ lack of empathy and compassion toward
others might relate to their egocentric behavior and higher tendency to lie, threaten,
and be cruel toward their siblings and friends. As they move into adolescence, they
continue to show violence at school and also toward their parents (Estévez & Góngora,
2009; Garrido, 2005). Since young people with CU traits fail to feel remorse or empa-
thy for peers with whom they are aggressive, they may generalize to hurting their
parents or other people in the home.
Evidently, a study conducted on 9,415 Polish adolescents found that those with
high levels of CU traits were significantly more aggressive and persistent in their
aggressive behavior compared to their peers who did not possess these traits (Perenc
& Radochonski, 2013). Consequently, aggressive behavior are more stable among
youth with high CU traits (Byrd et al., 2012; Frick & White, 2008; Muñoz & Frick,
2007), which shows the importance of conducting assessment on these traits among
CPA perpetrators. In their trait-based model proposed to explain the incidences of
CPA, Kuay et al. (2017) theorized young people who perpetrate aggression toward
their parents into two groups; the first group were called “generalists” who were theo-
rized to be high on CU traits and directed their aggression toward parents and peers as
well as siblings. The second group were the “specialists” who were theorized to be low

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT