Bridging the Gap? Ex-Military Personnel and Military–Civilian Transition Within the Prison Workforce
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X211039879 |
Published date | 01 January 2023 |
Date | 01 January 2023 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20917183
Article
1134644AFSXXX10.1177/0095327X20917183Armed Forces & SocietyLevy
research-article2022
Bridging the Gap? Ex-Military
Personnel and Military–
Civilian Transition Within
the Prison Workforce
Jennifer Turner
1
and Dominique Moran
2
Abstract
Prior research into military–civilian transition has suggested that the Prison Service may
be a popular destination for Armed Forces leavers, but the experience of former
military personnel within the prison system as prison staff (rather than as Veterans in
Custody) has so far been overlooked. As a result, we know very little about their route
into prison work. This article reports on a UK study investigating the experience of
prison personnel who have previously served in the military and presents the first set of
empirical evidence addressing these critical questions. Whilst our findings mirror
prevailing assumptions of a relatively seamless transition to post-military careers (and,
in particular, those within Protective Service Occupations), few had intended a career
in prison work specifically. Such trajectories may influence personal military–civilian
transitions, as well as job performance in prison work and, by extension, the everyday
lives of prisoners and other prison staff.
Keywords
veterans, military culture, prisons, prison staff, armed forces leavers
1
Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universit¨
at Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
2
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Corresponding Author:
Jennifer Turner, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universit¨
at Oldenburg, Ammerlander
Heerstr. 114-118, Oldenburg 26111, Germany.
Email: jennifer.turner@uni-oldenburg.de
Armed Forces & Society
2023, Vol. 49(1) 70 –90
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X211039879
journals.sagepub.com/home/afs
Turner and Moran 71
Military personnel experience a multitude of ‘transitions’during their military career,
such as change in job role, deployment overseas or promotion to higher ranks. The most
significant transition for many, however,is the return to civilian life and, in particula r,to
civilian employment. Most ex-military personnel who are physically and mentally well
go on to have second careers. They transition relatively seamlessly and require no
assistance with aspects of unemployment, debt, homelessness, relationship breakdown
or poor health (Ashcroft, 2014;Walker, 2013). Nevertheless, whether leaving is pre-
planned (such as at the end of a service contract) or unexpected (through ill health or
dismissal), military experience inevitably influences the subsequent evolution of post-
military identities (Cowen, 2005;Riley & Bateman, 1987;Walker, 2018). Although
‘pathologising’military–civilian transition risks positioning military experience as an
affliction from which individuals need ‘rehabilitation’, even those ‘successfully’
transitioning face ‘significant cultural, social and spatial changes’and perform liminal
identities via the ‘legacies’of military service (Herman & Yarwood, 2014, pp. 41–42, p.
49).
These circumstances are well known. Wide-ranging research tracks the post-military
careers of personnel leaving the armed forces, including various studies of specific
destination professions. Research into post-military careers has tracked former military
personnel into teaching (Gordon & Newby Parham, 2019;Robertson & Brott, 2013);
police work (Ivie & Garland, 2011;Johnson, 2013;Olson & Gabriel-Olson, 2012;
Patterson, 2002); the fire service (Bartlett et al., 2020); corporate careers (Benmelech &
Frydman, 2015;Gagliardo, 2020;Kaur & Singh, 2018;Koch-Bayram & Wernicke,
2018); and entrepreneurship (Heinz et al., 2017;Kerrick et al., 2014). Across these and
other studies, researchers find that military experience is to some extent predictive of
professional performance, being variously associated with more conservative and
ethical behaviour in business, better management of occupational stress, high levels of
resilience and, in teaching, a greater likelihood of remaining in the profession compared
to conventionally–trained teachers. Accordingly, these insights are expanding our
understanding of military–civilian transition and post-military careers. However, one
significant workplace –the prison –has thus far escaped the attention of researchers.
Despite a now extensive body of research into prison staff and prison management,
we know very little about ex-military prison staff and their transition to the Prison
Service. This is surprising given that new research (Moran & Turner, forthcoming)
suggests that historically ex-military personnel have comprised up to 75% of the prison
officer workforce. In England and Wales, a key report published by HMIP in 2014
found that former military personnel constituted 7% of the prisoner population (HMIP,
2014) where they are often termed ‘Veterans in Custody’or VICs. This much-cited
statistic justifiably underpinned extensive subsequent research related to this cohort
(e.g. Albertson et al., 2017;Fossey et al., 2017;MacManus & Wood, 2017;Phillips,
2020). Whilst we do not suggest that VICs are undeserving of the considerable research
attention they have attracted, this percentage is self-evidently only a fraction of that
constituted by ex-military prison officers within their own workforce. In addition,
without some sense of the possible patterns in the profiles and experiences for former
2Armed Forces & Society 0(0)
To continue reading
Request your trial