Book Reviews : Protest and Prejudice: A Study of Belief in the Black Community. By GARY T. MARX. Foreword by BAYARD RUSTIN. (New York: Harper & Row, 1967. Pp. xxviii, 228, xxvii. $8.95.)

AuthorWilliam C. Spragens
DOI10.1177/106591296802100324
Published date01 September 1968
Date01 September 1968
Subject MatterArticles
526
This
is
an
enlightening
new
look
at
an
important
legislative
and
enforcement
problem,
although
the
scope
of
the
study
might
have been
broadened
somewhat.
Wisconsin
State
University,
Oshkosh
WILLIAM
C.
SPRAGENS
Protest
and
Prejudice:
A
Study
of
Belief
in
the
Black
Community.
By
GARY
T.
MARX.
Foreword
by
BAYARD
RUSTIN.
(New
York:
Harper
&
Row,
1967.
Pp.
xxviii,
228,
xxvii.
$8.95.)
This
comprehensive
study,
part
of
a
series
commissioned
by
the
Anti-Defama-
tion
League
of
B’nai
B’rith,
gives
useful
insights
into
a
vital
issue,
attitudes
of
the
American
Negro
toward
the
white
majority.
Findings
of
the
study,
expressed
empirically,
are
based
on
sample
surveys
carried
out
in
1964
and
1966,
primarily
in
Negro
ghettos.
The
author
says
the
data
suggest
that
many
people
hold
an
overly
sensational
image
of the
Negro
mood.
It
would
be
interesting
to
have
results
of
a
similar
survey
made
just
after
the
Detroit
riots
of
1967.
Marx
comments:
&dquo;To
be
sure
there
is
deep
anger
and
frustration,
as
well
as
varying
degrees
of
suspicion
and
resentment
of
whites.
Yet,
there
is
still
optimism
about
the
possibility
of
change
within
the
system.
Most
Negroes
favor
integration
in
principle,
are
loyal
to
the
United
States,
are
opposed
to
indiscrimi-
nate
violence,
and
are
not
consistently
antiwhite
or
anti-Semitic.
These
facts
aside,
rather
than
endless
discussion
about
the
nature
of
so-called
Negro
extremism,
attention
might
better
be
focused
on
changing
the
general
social
conditions
that
have
given
rise
to
virulent
hatreds
and
extreme
attitudes
on
the
part
of
a
small
but
no
doubt
increasing
minority
of
the
black
community.&dquo;
The
first
part
of
the
Marx
study
is
concerned
with
describing
various
Negro
responses
to
the
civil
rights
struggle
and
evaluating
their
prevalence.
The
second
part
of
the
study
is
concerned
with
Negro
attitudes
toward
whites,
and
one
aspect
of
the
study
is
an
analysis
of
Negro
anti-Semitism.
Numerous
breakdowns
of
data
by
item
analysis,
such
as
a
score
on
Index
of
Actual
Social
Participation,
are
presented,
as
well
as
representative
quotations
from
survey
respondents.
Conclusions
of
the
1964
and
1966
surveys
included
the
following:
Only
a
third
of
the
Negro
community
was
consistently
militant
in
outlook.
In
spite
of
what
many
would
consider
strong
provocation,
even
fewer
were
strongly
antiwhite.
To
the
degree
Negroes
distinguish
between
Jewish
and
non-Jewish
whites,
they
prefer
Jews.
Civil
rights
militancy
was
negatively
related
to
antiwhite
and
anti-
Jewish
feelings.
In
spite
of
its
importance
to
protest
in
some
respects,
religiosity
is
an
important
factor
inhibiting
militancy.
Conventional
civil
rights
groups
and
leaders
enjoyed
overwhelming
popularity.
Very
few
Negros
were
strong
supporters
of
the
Black
Muslims.
The
least-privileged
Negroes,
who
are
most
likely
to
profit
from
social
change,
were
the
least
likely
to
be
militant.
Marx
warns
however
that
&dquo;...
[S]uch
findings
offer
no
grounds
for
compla-
cency.
The
magnitude
of
moral
injustice,
the
intensity
of
concern
felt
by
many,
and
the
ever-increasing
potential
for
social
disruption
cannot
be
measured
by
a
simple
counting
of
the
’yeas’
and
’nays’....&dquo;

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT