Book Reviews and Notices : The Thirsty Land: The Story of the Central Valley Project. By ROBERT DE Roos. (Stanford University, California: Stanford University Press. 1948. Pp. xi, 265. $4.00.)

AuthorJohn C. Bollens
Published date01 September 1949
Date01 September 1949
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/106591294900200349
Subject MatterArticles
467
his
autobiography.
The
reviewer
is
angered
(politely,
to
be
sure)
by
Bloom’s
failure
to
concentrate
more
fully
on
the
vicissitudes
he
has
en-
countered
in
his
political
campaigns.
In
this
regard,
very
little
attention
is
given
to
the
matrix
of
factors
that
are
crucial
in
promoting
or
retarding
the
victories
of
political
parties.
While
Bloom’s
references
to
the
Repub-
lican
Party
are
couched
in
the
spirit
of
fairness,
he
doesn’t
intimate
why
the
party
has
been
repudiated
by
large
segments
of
the
population,
or
a
f ortiori,
whether
there
is
a
peril
in
the
disintegrative
tendencies
of
our
two-party
system.
Surely,
the
dangers
in
the
continuance
of
Democratic
control
in
the
White
House
cannot
be
dismissed
lightly
by
distinguished
stars
of
the
political
horizon.
Bloom
is
overly
cautious
and
narrowly
circumspect
in
his
discussion
of
the
Jewish
problem.
There
is
a
need
for
a
thorough
examination
of
the
psychological
implications
of
the
Jewish
problem
by
one
who
has
managed
to
transcend
the
obstacles
as
well
as
Bloom.
But,
all
in
all,
the
raison
d’6tre
of
the
book
has been
clearly
established,
and
we
should
be
grateful
to
the
Congressman
for
his
contribution.
Brooklyn,
N.
Y.
SAMUEL
ABRAHAMS.
The
Thirsty
Land:
The
Story
of
the
Central
Valley
Project.
By
ROBERT
DE
Roos.
(Stanford
University,
California:
Stanford
University
Press.
1948.
Pp.
xi,
265.
$4.00.)
Written
by
a
San
Francisco
newspaperman,
this
book
is
concerned
with
a
major
California
reclamation
project
which
aims
at
correcting
the
unequal
natural
distribution
of
water.
The
author
candidly
admits
several
biases
on
the
opening
prefatory
page:
(1)
his
belief
that
the
United
States
Bureau
of
Reclamation
is
following
the
right
policy;
(2)
his
lack
of
ob-
jection
to
state
management
and
operation
of
the
project
if
a
sensible
plan
can
be
determined
for
the
transfer
from
federal
to
state
jurisdiction;
and
(3)
his
opposition
to
the
efforts
of
the
Pacific
Gas
and
Electric
Company
to
obtain
control
of
the
electrical
energy
generated
by
the
project’s
power
plants.
There
is
overwhelming
agreement
that
the
Central
Valley
Project
is
needed,
that
the
physical
plan
and
design
are
good,
and
that
the
con.
struction
job
should
be
performed
by
the
national
government.
But
there
is
little
agreement
on
policy
matters.
Nevertheless,
the
basic
issue
is
clear:
Shall
the
federal
government,
through
the
Bureau
of
Reclamation,
maintain
control
over
the
use
of
irrigation
water
and
electrical
energy
produced
by
the
project?
Shall
the
federal
government,
in
short,
operate
the
project
under
federal
law
for
the
benefit
of
the
many
after
spending
hundreds
of
millions
in
the
construction?
Or
shall
the
federal
government
complete
the
project
and
bow
out,
leaving
its
operation
to
others,
without
regard
to
federal
law?

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT