Book Reviews
Date | 01 September 1986 |
DOI | 10.1177/0003603X8603100309 |
Author | Elinor H. Solomon |
Published date | 01 September 1986 |
Subject Matter | Book Reviews |
The
Antitrust
Bulletin/Fall 1986
Power, Empire Building
and
Mergers
Stephen A. Rhoades
Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books (1983), 153 pp.
Mergers in Perspective
835
Yale Brozen
Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
Research (1982), 88 pp.
Reviewed by Elinor H. Solomon, Department
of
Economics,
The George Washington University.
Stephen Rhoades' Power, Empire Building and Mergers, and
Yale
Brozen's Mergers in Perspective, present a lively and lucid con-
trast in their approach to much that dominates the antitrust
merger arena today. They highlight two divergent philosophies;
they look at some
of
the same major antitrust cases. Both touch
sensitive nerve centers and are good and important reading.
They identify acommon goal. Both authors seek above all to
preserve competitive capitalism. Both look primarily to market
forces to solve market failures. But practical solutions differ. For
Dr. Rhoades, any persistent market failure is to be remedied at
least in part through astrengthened body
of
antitrust law. In
contrast, market failure often results, Dr. Brozen believes, from
problems largely caused by regulators including overzealous anti-
trust prosecutors, and may be better corrected by deregulation
and a more sparing use of antitrust solutions.
I.
Power, Empire Building and Mergers employs a multifaceted
approach to merger and concentration questions. Dr. Rhoades'
economic, mathematical, and econometric credentials for under-
© 1986by Federal Legal Publications, Inc.
To continue reading
Request your trial