Book Review: The Economics of Industrial Organization
Published date | 01 June 1991 |
Date | 01 June 1991 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X9103600207 |
Subject Matter | Book Reviews |
The Antitrust Bulletin/Summer
1991
The Economics
of
Industrial
Organization
William G. Shepherd
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (3d ed. 1990) ix +566 pp.
503
Reviewed by James W. Brock, Bill R. Moeckel Professor
of
Economics and Business, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
For jurists, practitioners and antitrust specialists, industrial
organization has for a decade been a battlefield.
The traditional mainstream
view-that
the competitive proc-
ess must be policed and curbed in certain directions if it is to
survive and perform its essential economic work; that effective
competition is ultimately rooted in the structure
of
markets and
industries; and that a key task
of
antitrust policy is to maintain
structurally competitive conditions against the depredations
of
oligopoly, monopoly, and concentration-inducing mergers and
acquisitions-has been assaulted by articulate iconoclasts armed
with grandiose assertions and bombastic claims.
Espousing "consumer welfare" and "efficiency,"
and
wrapped in the mantle
of
"science," the self-proclaimed advo-
cates
of
the so-called new learning have propagandized their
cause across the country with doctrinaire certitude in courtrooms
and ideological bootcamps for judges. Resurrecting the economic
Darwinism
of
a century ago, they have insisted that whatever is,
is best; that whatever happens, must happen; and that antitrust
efforts to maintain competitive market structures are sadly unin-
formed, woefully misguided, and dangerously counterproductive.
Thus, where they occur, oligopoly and monopoly industry
structures must, by the fact
of
their existence, be most effective in
©1991by Federal Legal Publications, Inc.
To continue reading
Request your trial