Book Review: Memoirs

AuthorLowell G. Noonan
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/106591297903200233
Published date01 June 1979
Date01 June 1979
Subject MatterBook Review
24.1.
Western Political Quarterly
social development of any society. Erickson himself at first seems to follow Wiarda
in considering Iberian culture and Catholicism critid, but ends up
by
acknowledg-
ing that corporatist tendencies can
be
found in countries such as Nonvay, Britain,
and West Germany. The problem is not really resolved, but simply blurred, by then
attempting to distinguish between different types of corporatism. This question
apart, the present writer has no hestitation in recommending Erickson’s book as
a
study of substantial interest and value.
University
of
hrero
Mexico
MARTIN
C.
NEEDLER
The
Supreme Soviet: Politics
and
the Legislative Process
in
the
Soviet
Political
Systenz.
By
PETER
VANNENAN.
(Durham: Duke University Press,
1977.
Pp.
sii,
256.
$14.75.)
As
a
part of the Comparative Legislative Studies Series, and
as
the only book-
length treatment of the subject, Vanneman’s work commands attention.
The book begins with the historical evolution of assemblies in tsarist and
Bolshevik periods, highlighting the ambiguous legacy
of
“residual legitimacy resid-
ing in the people” in times
of
disinte,grating central authority. Considerable atten-
tion is given to the fundamental question of sovereignty and to the theoretical rela-
tionship between state power and political
power.
At least under the Stalin Consti-
tution, Vanneman points out, the real distinction was moot.
of
the Supreme Soviet, its Presidium, and its commissions. The 1967 espnsion of
the commission system and its ability to supervise the government is evaluated
primarily in terms
of
potential, rather than accomplished practice. Vanneman also
reviews the familiar debate over whether the Presidium has independent authority
or
only authority deleptcd from the Supreme Soviet.
An excellent chart depicts the relationships among various forms of legal acts
and their issuing agencies. Several good tables display relevant attributes of Sup-
reme Soviet deputies and illustrate the extent of membership overlap among organs
of the Supreme Soviet, the government, and the Party.
Most interesting are the evaluative dimensions
of
Vanneman’s study. Noting
the broadly representative composition
of
the Supreme Soviet, the author infers
concern for
a
more democratic image,” because of the increasing proportion of
“genuine proletarians” among the deputies. On the other hand, the 1967 reform
has
been followed by a growing participation
of
Central Committee members in
Supreme Soviet affairs:
as
deputies, as heads of commissions (officials
of
the Cen-
tral Apparatus)
,
and as members of subcommissions (officials of the government
and public organizations). Vanneman interprets this trend as evidence of the
Party’s “quest to maintain its legitimacy” and to “legalize its control of other pro-
Party’s “quest to maintain its legitimacy” and to “legalize its control
of
other organs
of the polity.”
Such conclusions ring shallow. The author‘s almost exclusive reliance upon
sources from
1968
and earlier precludes his developing the perspective necessary
for evaluation. His implicit view
of
the CPSU
as
an undifferentiated monolith
prevents serious consideration of the Supreme Soviet as an alternative policy arena
in factional competition. The fern perfunctory references to other legislative
S~S-
tems do not provide
a
useful comparative framework, especially with respect to the
Party-legislative relationship. In other words, Vanneman’s
work
is an important
prerequisite to meaningful analysis
J
but it is no substitute.
In.
rnrnnbtq-
JetxiL
Xq
n
nemwzxw~~~.th~
.ixmsA
~~~~~~~,~~~.~1~~~~~~~~
..
cr
C.
BRADLEY
SCHARF
University
of
Arizona
-
Alenzoirs.
By
JEAN
hIONNET.
Introduction by George
\V.
Ball. Translated from
the French by Richard Mayne. (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and
Company,
1978.
Pp.
541.
$12.95.)
This
journal extends chronologically from Monnet’s childhood and early man-
hood in the Charentc (he was born in Cognac in
1888)
to his retirement in
1975,

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT