Beyond hollowing out: Public sector managers and the use of external management consultants
Published date | 01 May 2023 |
Author | Ian Kirkpatrick,Andrew J. Sturdy,Nuria Reguera Alvarado,Gianluca Veronesi |
Date | 01 May 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13612 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Beyond hollowing out: Public sector managers and the
use of external management consultants
Ian Kirkpatrick
1
| Andrew J. Sturdy
2
| Nuria Reguera Alvarado
3
|
Gianluca Veronesi
4,5
1
York Management School, University of York,
York, UK
2
University of Bristol Business School, The
University of Bristol UK, Bristol, UK
3
Faculty of Business and Economic Sciences,
University of Seville, Seville, Spain
4
University of Bristol Business School, The
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5
Crown Prince Frederick Center for Public
Leadership, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Correspondence
Gianluca Veronesi, Tyndall’s Park Road 11-13
1.08, University of Bristol Business School, Bristol
BS8 1SN, UK.
Email: gianluca.veronesi@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
Expenditure on management consultants in public sector organizations is generally
seen as contributing to a “hollowing out”of the state through the substitution of
internal management capability. However, there is little systematic evidence for this
view which also ignores how public sector managers may, themselves, drive con-
sulting use. Looking at 125 English public hospitals over 6 years, we explore the rela-
tionship between the development and composition of management functions and
spending on consultants. Our findings show the absence of a substitution effect
and, therefore, challenge the “hollowing out”thesis. Instead, they point to a more
active, occupationally varied and political use of consultancy. We find that larger
management functions overall are associated with greater reliance on consultants—
a complementary relationship. However, where a higher proportion of managers are
engaged in internal consulting functions, this results in the lower use of external
management consultants, with implications for theory, research and policy.
Evidence for practice
•The findings challenge the widespread view that external management consul-
tancy use substitutes for in-house management functions.
•The use of external management consultancy does not lead to a ‘hollowing out’
of in-house management functions.
•Public sector organizations with larger management functions use more consult-
ing advice, suggesting a complementary relationship.
•Public sector organizations with more managers involved in internal consulting
work tend to make less use of external consultants.
“We contend that one of the major reasons
for the heavy use of outside experts is the
belief prevalent in our society that govern-
ment …is inefficient, ineffective, and staffed
with idle, incompetent, security-seeking
individuals.”(Kline, 1979, 226)
Debates about the hollowing out of the state are long
standing in the public administration literature (Milward &
Provan, 2000;Rhodes,1994). Hollowing out denotes a num-
berofprocessesthatleadtoasmallerandalteredrolefor
the state, including the loss of authority to supra national
bodies (such as the European Union) and moves to privat-
ize and outsource public services (Skelcher, 2000,5).Most
recently, the latter has become increasingly salient in the
case of expert advice drawn from management consulting
firms (Craft & Halligan, 2020). While initially concentrated in
the United States and Westminster-based governments,
consultancy use has spread further on the back of New
Public Management (NPM) reforms (Saint-Martin, 2012).
Globally, it is estimated that consulting revenue from
governments exceeded $85bn in 2018 (IBIS World, 2019).
The appeal of these services to clients includes the promise
of fast and efficient delivery, the acquisition of new skills
Received: 2 June 2022 Revised: 26 January 2023 Accepted: 26 January 2023
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13612
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribu tion and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.
© 2023 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration.
Public Admin Rev. 2023;83:537–551. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/puar 537
To continue reading
Request your trial