Barriers and enablers of coordination across healthcare system levels

Published date01 November 2023
AuthorChristian Gadolin,Erik Eriksson
Date01 November 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2871
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Barriers and enablers of coordination across healthcare
system levels
Christian Gadolin
1,2
| Erik Eriksson
2,3
1
School of Business, Economics and IT,
University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
2
Centre for Healthcare Improvement,
Department of Technology Management and
Economics, Chalmers University of
Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
3
Department of Work Life and Social Welfare,
University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
Correspondence
Christian Gadolin, School of Business,
Economics and IT, University West,
Trollhättan, Sweden.
Email: christian.gadolin@hv.se
Coordination across healthcare system levels is a global imperative to ensure efficient
resource utilization and provide high-quality care. The substantial body of research
on coordination in healthcare mainly concerns coordination across professional and
organizational domains. Consequently, there is a dearth of empirical research aimed
at delineating the determinants of coordination across healthcare system levels. This
paper describes and analyses the barriers and enablers of healthcare coordination
across national, regional, and local system levels in a populous Swedish region. Indi-
vidual interviews and focus group discussions, encompassing a total of 63 individuals,
were conducted with managers, administrators, and politicians. The findings of the
paper underscore that the barriers identified were most often of a structural or insti-
tutional character, whereas the enablers of the studied cross-level coordination were
mostly relational. Therefore, we propose that future research should aim to further
delineate the prerequisites for personal relationships to emerge, as well as how they
may act as enablers of coordination across healthcare system levels.
KEYWORDS
healthcare coordination, healthcare efficiency, healthcare systems, high-quality care
1|INTRODUCTION
A widespread consequence of reforms associated with New Public
Management (NPM) is the fragmentation of the public service sector
and its interrelated impeded ability to coordinate public service deliv-
ery (Agranoff, 2012; Gregory, 2003; Sullivan & Skelcher, 2017; van
Meerkerk & Edelenbos, 2018; Webb, 1991). Various approaches in
the contemporary public administration and management literature
have aimed to facilitate the coordination of public service delivery,
through decreasing and/or efficiently managing fragmentation
(Bryson et al., 2014; Christensen & Lægreid, 2007; Halligan, 2010;
Klijn & Koppenjan, 2015;Lægreid et al., 2015; Trein et al., 2019; Trein
et al., 2020). The need to improve service delivery coordination has
been identified as pivotal, not least within various national healthcare
systems globally (Cebul et al., 2008; Elhauge, 2010; Mossialos
et al., 2005; Nolte et al., 2012; Snow et al., 2020; Vargas et al., 2015).
Unsurprisingly, given the healthcare sector's major exposure to NPM-
associated reforms (Simonet, 2011), the inability to coordinate service
delivery has majorly impeded healthcare systems' efficient utilization
of available resources, hampering their ability to provide high-quality
care (Eriksson et al., 2020; Eriksson & Hellström, 2021; Schultz
et al., 2013). This constitutes a major concern, not least given the
magnitude of the cost associated with healthcare provision in most
developed countries (OECD, 2019).
Although actors across distinct levels within healthcare systems
have had difficulty coordinating their efforts, which has hampered
their ability to collaborate (cf. Gulati et al., 2012), studies addressing
coordination across these system levels are scarce (Vargas
et al., 2016). Therefore, although a substantial body of research has
addressed care coordination across professional and organizational
domains, often locally or related to a specific condition (e.g., Gadolin
et al., 2022; Gorin et al., 2017; Karam et al., 2018; Røsstad
Received: 30 January 2023 Revised: 5 April 2023 Accepted: 22 May 2023
DOI: 10.1002/pa.2871
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Public Affairs published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
J Public Affairs. 2023;23:e2871. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of11
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2871

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex